Adolescence, 2025 Release by John
W. Santrock
Complete Chapters are included
(Ch 1 to 13)
** Immediate Download
** Swift Response
** All Chapters included
,Table of Contents are given below
1. Introduction
2. Puberty, Health, and Biological Foundations
3. The Brain and Cognitive Development
4. The Self, Identity, Emotion, and Personality
5. Gender
6. Sexuality
7. Moral Development, Values, and Religion
8. Families
9. Peers, Romantic Relationships, and Lifestyles
10. Schools
11. Achievement, Work, and Careers
12. Culture
13. Problems in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood
, Chapter 1
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
What makes adolescents tick? The answer to that question has changed considerably since the
fourth century B.C., when early Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle identified two qualities that
distinguish adolescents from children—reasoning ability and self-determination. In the Middle
Ages, children and adolescents were viewed as miniature adults and were subjected to harsh
discipline. During the eighteenth century, Rousseau believed infants, children, adolescents, and
young adults demonstrated unique behavior during distinct developmental phases. G. Stanley Hall
began the process of scientifically studying adolescence in the 1800s. Strongly influenced by
Darwinian thought, Hall proposed that adolescent development is controlled primarily by
biological factors. Hall’s storm-and-stress view concept is that adolescence is a turbulent time
charged with conflict and mood swings. Unlike Darwin and Hall, Margaret Mead concluded that
sociocultural influences affect the adolescent experience to a greater extent than genetics.
Although adolescence has a biological base, as G. Stanley Hall argued, it also has a sociocultural
base, as Mead maintained. Sociohistorical circumstances may be considered the most influential
aspect of change for adolescents. The inventionist view posits that adolescence resulted from:
● declines in adolescent apprenticeships;
● increases in skill and educational requirements;
● urbanization and separation of work and home life;
● creation of age-segregated systems for education and socialization; and
● the writings of G. Stanley Hall.
Historians call the period between 1890 and 1920 the “age of adolescence,” when lawmakers
enacted a great deal of compulsory legislation aimed at youth. Discussing historical changes in the
way individuals have experienced adolescence involves focusing on changes in generations, such
as a cohort, a group of people who are born at a similar point in history and share similar
experiences as a result. The term cohort effects refers to influences attributed to a person’s year
of birth, era, or generation rather than their actual chronological age.
By 1950, the developmental period of adolescence had not only physical and social identities
but a legal identity as well. The voices of adolescents were heard loud and clear during the political
protests in the 1960s and 1970s. The women’s movement of the 1970s changed how research on
adolescents was conducted; research now included female as well as male adolescents.
Santrock, Adolescence, 2025R IM-1 | 1
, Chapter 1
The label millennials applies to the generation born between 1981 and 1996—the first to come
of age and enter emerging adulthood in the new millennium. Two characteristics of millennials
that stand out are their connection to technology and their ethnicity. Because their ethnic diversity
is greater than that of prior generations, many millennial adolescents and emerging adults are more
tolerant and open-minded than their counterparts in previous generations. People born in 1997 or
later are sometimes considered part of a new generation, dubbed generation Z, and are even more
technologically sophisticated and ethnically diverse than millennials. Members of generation Z are
more likely to attend college than millennials.
Although most adolescents proceed from adolescence to adulthood competently, too many do not.
U.S. adolescents’ achievement in a number of academic areas, such as math and science, is far
lower than that of their counterparts in many other countries, especially those in Asia.
Approximately 20 percent of U.S. high school seniors engage in alcohol abuse; almost one-third
of U.S. adolescent girls become pregnant by the age of 20; and adolescent obesity has increased
threefold in recent decades.
Groups tend to gather stereotypical descriptions, and stereotypes of adolescents are plentiful.
During most of the twentieth century and the first few decades of the twenty-first century,
adolescents have been portrayed as abnormal and deviant rather than normal and nondeviant. The
media portray adolescents as rebellious, conflicted, faddish, delinquent, and self-centered. The
focus on highly visible members of the adolescent age group led Joseph Adelson to coin the term
adolescent generalization gap, which refers to generalizations that are based on information
about a limited, often highly visible group of adolescents.
The negative stereotyping of adolescents is overdrawn. Studies assessing self-images of
adolescents around the world found that the majority of the adolescents had positive self-images.
Another study of non-Latinx White and African American 12 to 20 years old in the United States
found that they were characterized much more by positive than problematic development, even in
their most vulnerable times, and were engaged in healthy behaviors and had supportive
relationships with parents and friends, and their positive self-perceptions were much stronger than
their angry and depressed feelings.
Adults’ perceptions of adolescents emerge from a combination of personal experience and
media portrayals, neither of which produces an objective picture of how adolescents typically
develop. In matters of taste and manners, the youth of every generation have seemed radical,
unnerving, and different from adults—different in how they look, how they behave, the music they
enjoy, their hairstyles, and the clothing they choose. Acting out and boundary testing, however,
are time-honored ways in which adolescents move toward accepting, rather than rejecting, parental
values.
Santrock, Adolescence, 2025R IM-1 | 2