SSD- EXAM 2 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
consistent with apraxia of speech - Answer --language therapy alone does not improve
intelligibility
-good communication intent
-significant gap between receptive and expressive language abilities
-words may not be said the same way each time
not consistent with apraxia of speech - Answer --language therapy significantly
improves intelligibility
-poor communicative intent
-expressive language are commensurate with receptive language abilities
-same sound errors are made each time
general observations you may see in childhood apraxia of speech - Answer --issues
with consistently producing a sound and often words in the same way with a
performance that may change day to day
-reduced evidence of early babbling
-significant issues with sequencing and blending sounds
-the longer the connected speech productions the greater the errors
this treatment set represent targeting /l/ across level of production - Answer -like, i like, i
like you
the three basic steps in minimal pair intervention - Answer --familiarization of the
stimulus
-listen and pick up the named stimulus
-verbally produce the minimal pairs in a reverse teacher-client format
agents of change or those who influence the remediation of a target, for a client may
include - Answer --SLP
-SLPA
-teacher
-parent
How many exemplars (or stimulus) are recommended for a minimal pairs treatment set?
- Answer -3-5
what does the phrase "reduce homonymity" mean - Answer -say two different words
using the required sounds that differentiate them
in minimal pairs, adding the perception-production steps allow the child - Answer -to
learn to hear the difference between two words to aid in awareness to improve
production
, does parental follow through matter in the SSD intervention process - Answer -yes
when might you add the perception step to a minimal pair intervention approach -
Answer -when the child is struggling with reducing homonymity and cannot hear the
difference between words
the word sets represent a change across word position - Answer -cat-hat; cat-cot; cat-
cap
a minimal pair means two words are changed by __ phoneme - Answer -1
Selecting words that are meaningful to the child and building consistency in production
but not necessarily reaching remediation of sounds is targeted in which approach? -
Answer -core vocabulary
the goal of the core vocabulary approach is to do - Answer -build consistency of
productions
the traditional intervention that uses "listen, watch, do" as its model - Answer -integral
stimulation
in addition to working across level of production, targeting prosody, groping, and
multisyllabic words is targeted - Answer -interventions for childhood apraxia of speech
CV, VC, CVC, CVCV are examples of - Answer -word shapes
phonologic - Answer -The sound rule system based on the language and dialect
employed and processes that are typical or atypical for a given language or dialect
auditory - Answer -acoustic signal and the processing of auditory information
phonetic - Answer -sounds are used in that language or dialect
syntax and semantics - Answer -word order of vocabulary in a given language
cognitive - Answer -accessing memory, thinking about what you know, engaging in
reasoning and problem solving, active attention
motor - Answer -plan and execute the motor sequence
working memory - Answer -The combination of automatic and purposeful acts of
cognition, motor processing, and audition (and Dr. Mayne adds in visual processing)
suprasegmentals - Answer -stress, intonation, loudness, pitch rate, vocal puncuation
consistent with apraxia of speech - Answer --language therapy alone does not improve
intelligibility
-good communication intent
-significant gap between receptive and expressive language abilities
-words may not be said the same way each time
not consistent with apraxia of speech - Answer --language therapy significantly
improves intelligibility
-poor communicative intent
-expressive language are commensurate with receptive language abilities
-same sound errors are made each time
general observations you may see in childhood apraxia of speech - Answer --issues
with consistently producing a sound and often words in the same way with a
performance that may change day to day
-reduced evidence of early babbling
-significant issues with sequencing and blending sounds
-the longer the connected speech productions the greater the errors
this treatment set represent targeting /l/ across level of production - Answer -like, i like, i
like you
the three basic steps in minimal pair intervention - Answer --familiarization of the
stimulus
-listen and pick up the named stimulus
-verbally produce the minimal pairs in a reverse teacher-client format
agents of change or those who influence the remediation of a target, for a client may
include - Answer --SLP
-SLPA
-teacher
-parent
How many exemplars (or stimulus) are recommended for a minimal pairs treatment set?
- Answer -3-5
what does the phrase "reduce homonymity" mean - Answer -say two different words
using the required sounds that differentiate them
in minimal pairs, adding the perception-production steps allow the child - Answer -to
learn to hear the difference between two words to aid in awareness to improve
production
, does parental follow through matter in the SSD intervention process - Answer -yes
when might you add the perception step to a minimal pair intervention approach -
Answer -when the child is struggling with reducing homonymity and cannot hear the
difference between words
the word sets represent a change across word position - Answer -cat-hat; cat-cot; cat-
cap
a minimal pair means two words are changed by __ phoneme - Answer -1
Selecting words that are meaningful to the child and building consistency in production
but not necessarily reaching remediation of sounds is targeted in which approach? -
Answer -core vocabulary
the goal of the core vocabulary approach is to do - Answer -build consistency of
productions
the traditional intervention that uses "listen, watch, do" as its model - Answer -integral
stimulation
in addition to working across level of production, targeting prosody, groping, and
multisyllabic words is targeted - Answer -interventions for childhood apraxia of speech
CV, VC, CVC, CVCV are examples of - Answer -word shapes
phonologic - Answer -The sound rule system based on the language and dialect
employed and processes that are typical or atypical for a given language or dialect
auditory - Answer -acoustic signal and the processing of auditory information
phonetic - Answer -sounds are used in that language or dialect
syntax and semantics - Answer -word order of vocabulary in a given language
cognitive - Answer -accessing memory, thinking about what you know, engaging in
reasoning and problem solving, active attention
motor - Answer -plan and execute the motor sequence
working memory - Answer -The combination of automatic and purposeful acts of
cognition, motor processing, and audition (and Dr. Mayne adds in visual processing)
suprasegmentals - Answer -stress, intonation, loudness, pitch rate, vocal puncuation
