100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

The Preliminary Ruling Procedure Under Article 267 TFEU

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
5
Uploaded on
15-01-2021
Written in
2020/2021

Lecture notes of 5 pages for the course Constitutional Foundations in the EU at UoS (.)

Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
January 15, 2021
Number of pages
5
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Samantha
Contains
All classes

Subjects

Content preview

The Preliminary Ruling Procedure Under Article 267 TFEU

Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU)
 Art 19 TEU.
 Judge from each Member State.
 27.
 Advocates General who give (non-binding) opinions.
 11.
 Sit in Chambers.
 Lower division – General Court.

Judgments of the CJEU
 The judgment is that of the entire Court – i.e. not dissenting opinions.
 Opinion of the Advocate General is only advisory in nature.

Functions of the CJEU – Art 19 TEU
 Art 19(1).
 The Court of Justice ‘shall ensure that in the interpretation and application of
the Treaties the law is observed’.
 Art 19(3).
 The Court of Justice of the EU shall, in accordance with Treaties:
 (a) – rule on actions brought by a Member State, an institution or a
natural or legal person.
 (b) – give preliminary rulings, at the request of courts or tribunals of
the Member States, on the interpretation of Union law or the validity
of acts adopted by the institutions.
 (c) – rule in other cases provided for the Treaties.

Summary of the Jurisdictions of the Court of Justice
 Art 267 TFEU.
 Preliminary rulings.
 Referred by national courts in pending cases.
 Art 263 TFEU.
 Judicial review of EU acts.
 Locus standi restrictions.
 Arts 258/259 TFEU.
 Infringement actions.
 Brought by Commission or (rarely) Member States.

What is the Preliminary Ruling Procedure?
 A process enabling national courts to refer questions of EU law to the CJEU in order
to help them resolve disputes in the national courts.
 IMP – the process starts and ends in the national courts.
 IMP – the CJEU does not decide the merits of the domestic case.
 An innovative and creative aspect of the EU judicial system.
 IMP – although the Treaty of Nice (and also the Treaty of Lisbon) provided for the
transfer of some Article 267 TFEU jurisdiction over preliminary rulings to the General

, Court (Article 256(3) TFEU) in specific area laid down by the Statute of the Court of
Justice, this has yet to be implemented.

The Jurisdiction of the CJEU – EU Law
 Article 267 TFEU – The Court of Justice of the EU shall have jurisdiction to give
preliminary rulings concerning:
 (a) – the interpretation of the Treaties.
 (b) – the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions, bodies, offices
or agencies of the Union.

The Jurisdiction of the CJEU – National Courts
 Article 267 TFEU – covers both lower and higher courts.
 Where such a question is raised before any court or tribunal of a Member
State, that court or tribunal may, if it considers that a decision on the
question is necessary to enable it to give judgment, request the Court to give
a ruling thereon.
 Where any such question is raised in a case pending before a court or
tribunal of a Member State against whose decisions there is no judicial
remedy under the national law, that court of tribunal shall bring the matter
before the Court.
 If such a question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a
Member State with regard to a person in custody, the Court of Justice of the
EU shall act with the minimum of delay’.

The Purpose of the Preliminary Ruling Procedure
 IMP – it is not an appeal process and the individual litigant is not involved in the
decision to refer.
 Secures uniformity of interpretation across the EU (and thus effectiveness of EU law).
 Allows (indirect) access by individuals to Court of Justice.
 However – key route for developing new EU principles and multilateral effects.
 Van Gend En Loos.
 Francovich.
 Von Colson.
 Mangold.
 Kucukdeveci.
 Low levels of actual judicial disobedience.
 Art 267 TFEU.
 ‘Jewel in the Crown’ of the Court’s jurisdiction.
 Has been of seminal importance to the development of EU law.




The Effects of a Preliminary Ruling
 Initially, relationship between national courts and the Court was horizontal and
bilateral.
$4.12
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
melindahogman University of Sussex
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
8
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
5
Documents
104
Last sold
2 year ago

4.4

23 reviews

5
10
4
12
3
1
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions