100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Understanding The Social World, Schutt: Summary of Ch. 1-10. Doing Research I - PPLE

Rating
3.0
(1)
Sold
6
Pages
53
Uploaded on
12-01-2021
Written in
2020/2021

This is a summary of all the mandatory chapters of the book Understanding the Social World by Schutt (Chapter 1-10). It includes some of the information presented in lectures on the book. It's a concise summary but doesn't miss any important information. It covers content such as qualitative/quantitative research, research strategies, ethics in research, and sampling. By using this as study material for the final exam for DRI-I, my final grade was a 9.2!

Show more Read less
Institution
Course











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Summarized whole book?
Yes
Uploaded on
January 12, 2021
Number of pages
53
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Chapter 1 - UTSW (Lecture + Reading)
What is research? → systematic investigation to find and report knowledge

Scientific research relies on logical and systematic methods, others can inspect and evaluate these methods.
Social science relies on scientific methods to investigate individuals and societies.

4 processes when reasoning / making a decision & their possible errors;
1. Observing
● Selective observation → only look at things in line with our beliefs
● Inaccurate observation → simply making an observation that is inaccurate

2. ​Generalizing
● Overgeneralization → something we have observed once ‘has to be’ the same every time

3. Reasoning
● Illogical reasoning → jumping to conclusions or making invalid assumptions

4. Reevaluating
● Resistance to change → not wanting to change your ideas or drawn conclusions
○ Why? →
■ Ego-based and institutional commitments
■ Excessive devotion to tradition
■ Uncritical agreement with authority


Scientific relevance Applied relevance
- Extend theory - Evaluate policy/program
- Empirical discoveries - Innovations in business
- Innovations in methods


General steps in the research process
1. Formulate a research question
→ explicit question that represents the direction and scope of your research

2. Literature review
- What is known?
- What concepts and theories have been applied?
- What methods have been applied?
- Any clashes of evidence?

3. Concepts & theories
Concept → organizing principles that describe aspects of the world (e.g. empathy)
Theory → a system of ideas intended to explain and predict regularities in the world

Concepts are key ingredients of theories

, 4. Formulate hypothesis
→ informed speculation that is set up to be tested about the relationship between variables

The hypothesis should be ​testable ​& ​falsifiable​ (=is it possible to conceive of an observation or
argument that proves the hypothesis to be false)

E.g. find 1 alien and the hypothesis that aliens don’t exist is wrong.

5. Decide on your research method/design & sample
Sample → the segment of the population that is selected for research (people, objects)
Design → a framework for the collection of data

6. Collect data

7. Analyze data
Quantitative analysis → application of statistical techniques to the data to test your hypothesis
(numbers & means)

Qualitative analysis → focuses on description, understanding, or interpretation of information
→ almost always inductive

8. Report/disseminate results

Quantitative and/or qualitative methods
Quantitative methods → surveys, experiments that record amounts
Qualitative methods → participant observation, interviewing, focus groups (written/spoken observations)

Quantitative methods are often used when the motives for research are explanation, description, or evaluation.
And quantitative researchers are often guided by a positivist philosophy.

Positivism → the belief that our perceptions and understanding of the social world can be distorted
by errors and that scientific methods can help us to see and understand reality more
clearly

Qualitative research is often guided by the philosophy of constructivism.

Constructivism → social reality is socially constructed and the goal of social scientists is to
understand what meanings people give to reality, not to determine how reality
works apart from these constructions

So, positivists believe there is a concrete, objective reality that scientific methods help us understand.
Constructivists believe that people construct an image of reality based on their own preferences and
prejudices and their interactions with others.

When combined; ​triangulation​.

,Epistemology
→ what is knowledge and how can it be acquired?

- Positivism​; application of natural science methods to the study of social reality (universal laws,
experiments, numbers)
- Interpretivism​; subjective meaning plays a crucial role (focus on interpretation and meaning of social
reality)
- You can’t say people have empathy of 5.3; like what does that mean?

Ontology
→ what is the nature of reality? (wikipedia; ​Ontology is the philosophical study of being. More broadly, it studies
concepts that directly relate to being, in particular becoming, existence, reality, as well as the basic categories of
being and their relations.)

- Objectivism​; social phenomena exist independently from social actors (mind-independent)
- Universality → everyone experiences the same
- Constructionism​; social phenomena are dependent on social actors and social interaction (focus
on change, subjectivity)
- Everyone experiences things differently because of e.g. culture
- Think of ‘social construct’

Deductive research
→ research with an expectation (hypothesis) is inferred from theory and then tested

Theory → hypothesis → observations/findings

- experimental research

Inductive research
→ research in which general conclusions are drawn from data

Observations/findings → theory

Research questions
They will;
- guide your literature search
- guide your hypothesis
- guide your decision about research designs
- guide decisions about data collection
- provide readers with a clear sense of your research

Criteria;
- clear - not too broad/narrow
- researchable - original contribution
- connection with theory & research - avoid ‘How…?’

Sources;
- gaps in literature - a social problem - personal experience
- opposing findings - counter-intuitive phenomena
- testing a theory - testing an intervention
- replication - collaborations with industry

, Interdisciplinary research questions ​→ integrate data, methods, concepts and theory from different
scientific disciplines → creates a common understanding (kitchen metaphor)

Types of social research
1. Descriptive research
→ social phenomena are defined and described (often quantitative; surveys, etc.)

2. Exploratory research
→ how people get along in the setting under question, what meaning they give to their actions and
issues concern them (often qualitative)

Asking ‘What is going on here?’ without having explicit expectations

3. Explanatory research
→ identify the causes and effects of social phenomena and predict how one phenomenon will change
or vary in response to variation in some other phenomenon

Will ​this​ → change​ this Cause → effect

Why do things happen and what are the consequences?

4. Evaluation research
→ describes/identifies the impact of social policies and programs

It can include elements of all research methods

Examples →
Descriptive research What are the characteristics of X?




Comparative What are the differences and similarities between X and Y?
research



Correlational What is the relationship between variable X and variable Y?
research



Exploratory What are the main factors in X? What is the role of Y in Z?
research



Explanatory Does X have an effect on Y? What is the impact of Y on Z? What are the causes of
research X?



Evaluation research What are the advantages and disadvantages of X? How well does Y work? How
effective or desirable is Z?

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
4 year ago

3.0

1 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
kceane Universiteit van Amsterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
215
Member since
7 year
Number of followers
179
Documents
3
Last sold
9 months ago
Samenvattingen stof middelbare school - havo en vwo + summaries of PPLE content

Ik ben begonnen op de havo. Vanaf het eerste jaar heb ik uitgebreide samenvattingen gemaakt. Met deze samenvattingen heb ik mijn hele havo tijd geleerd, en ik ben hier uiteindelijk cum laude mee geslaagd. Na de havo ben ik doorgestroomd naar het vwo. Hier heb ik ook 2 jaar lang uitgebreide samenvattingen gemaakt waar ik uiteindelijk mijn diploma mee heb weten te behalen. Nu zit ik op de UvA, waar ik PPLE studeer (politics, psychology, law & economics), en wederom samenvattingen schrijf :)

Read more Read less
3.8

32 reviews

5
8
4
12
3
10
2
0
1
2

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions