100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Saunders NCLEX-RN 2025 Review | 250+ Original Med-Surg Test Bank Questions w/ Rationales | Nursing Exam Prep for Students & Educators

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
409
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
10-10-2025
Written in
2025/2026

Saunders NCLEX-RN 2025 Review | 250+ Original Med-Surg Test Bank Questions w/ Rationales | Nursing Exam Prep for Students & Educators Ace the NCLEX-RN! 250+ original Med-Surg nursing questions with detailed rationales. Updated for 2025 NCLEX Test Plan. Perfect for students & educators. Master the NCLEX-RN with Confidence and Clinical Precision Prepare smarter—not harder—for the 2025 NCLEX-RN with this comprehensive Medical-Surgical Nursing test bank, expertly aligned with the latest Saunders Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination. Developed by experienced nurse educators and NCLEX item writers, this resource delivers 250+ original, high-quality NCLEX-style questions that mirror the format, rigor, and clinical reasoning required to pass the exam on your first attempt. What’s Inside 250+ Original NCLEX-RN Style Questions — Professionally written and 100% unique, modeled after real NCLEX test specifications. Comprehensive Coverage of Core Med-Surg Systems — Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Neurological, Gastrointestinal, Renal, Endocrine, and Musculoskeletal disorders. Aligned with the 2025 NCLEX-RN Test Plan — Incorporates the Clinical Judgment Measurement Model (CJMM) to strengthen decision-making and prioritization skills. Detailed Rationales for Every Option — Each item includes evidence-based explanations for both correct and incorrect answers, reinforcing critical thinking and pathophysiologic understanding. Professional Test Bank Formatting — Ideal for self-paced study, group learning, or classroom integration by nursing faculty. Realistic, Exam-Level Difficulty — Challenge yourself with the same cognitive level of analysis, application, and clinical judgment you’ll face on test day. Built by Experts, Trusted by Students Each question is crafted by a nurse educator and NCLEX item writer using the gold-standard approach found in the Saunders Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination. The content reflects current evidence-based nursing care, safety protocols, and clinical judgment trends emphasized in the latest NCLEX blueprint. Why This Test Bank Outperforms Generic Question Sets Evidence-Based & Peer-Reviewed: Every rationale draws from validated clinical guidelines and Saunders’ core nursing principles. Active Learning Design: Encourages self-assessment, reflection, and mastery of high-yield nursing concepts. Dual Utility: Perfect for both student self-assessment and educator classroom use—save hours of lesson prep with ready-to-use, professional-quality items. Ideal For Nursing students preparing for the NCLEX-RN or exit exams. Nurse educators seeking classroom-ready test banks with rationales. Clinical instructors integrating critical thinking and NCLEX-style evaluation. Independent learners aiming to boost confidence, accuracy, and exam endurance. Learning Outcomes By using this resource, you will: Strengthen pathophysiology comprehension across major body systems. Master priority setting, safety, and delegation per NCLEX frameworks. Improve interpretation of labs, ECGs, and patient data. Gain test-day confidence through realistic, evidence-driven practice. Your Success Starts Here Whether you’re reviewing for finals, clinical practice, or the official NCLEX-RN exam, this professionally developed test bank gives you the clarity, confidence, and competence you need to excel.

Show more Read less
Institution
NCLEX RN
Course
NCLEX RN











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
NCLEX RN
Course
NCLEX RN

Document information

Uploaded on
October 10, 2025
Number of pages
409
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

  • nclex rn test bank 2025

Content preview

Saunders Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-PN®
Examination
9th Edition


1 — Cardiovascular (acute chest pain / triage)
A 62-year-old man arrives to the ED reporting 30 minutes of
crushing chest pain radiating to the jaw and left arm. Which
action should the nurse perform first?
A. Administer 325 mg chewable aspirin PO.
B. Obtain a 12-lead ECG and have it interpreted immediately.
C. Give sublingual nitroglycerin for pain.
D. Apply oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 L/min.
Answer: B. Obtain a 12-lead ECG and have it interpreted
immediately.
Rationale (correct): The priority for a patient with chest pain
suggestive of acute coronary syndrome is immediate ECG
acquisition and interpretation (goal: within 10 minutes of
arrival) to identify ST-elevation or other acute ischemic changes
and activate definitive care (e.g., PCI). Rapid ECG guides time-
sensitive interventions. AHA Journals+1
Rationale (incorrect):
A — Aspirin is important and should be given early unless
contraindicated, but diagnosis via ECG (and triage) is the
immediate first action to determine next steps.

,C — Nitroglycerin can relieve ischemic pain but may be
contraindicated (e.g., hypotension, recent PDE-5 inhibitor use)
and should follow rapid assessment/ECG.
D — Oxygen is indicated only if hypoxemia (SpO₂ <90%),
respiratory distress, or other high-risk features; routine
supplemental oxygen for all chest pain is not currently
recommended.


2 — Cardiovascular (HF lab interpretation)
A client with known chronic heart failure presents with
worsening dyspnea. Lab results: BNP 780 pg/mL (reference
<100), Hgb 12.2 g/dL, creatinine 1.1 mg/dL. Which
interpretation is most accurate?
A. BNP is consistent with decompensated heart failure and
supports the diagnosis of acute exacerbation.
B. Normal hemoglobin rules out significant volume overload.
C. Creatinine excludes renal contribution; BNP must be false
positive.
D. BNP is unreliable; rely only on chest x-ray for congestive
failure.
Answer: A. BNP is consistent with decompensated heart
failure and supports the diagnosis of acute exacerbation.
Rationale (correct): BNP (or NT-proBNP) rises with ventricular
stretch/volume overload and values in the several hundreds are
supportive of heart-failure exacerbation in the appropriate

,clinical context. Elevated BNP together with dyspnea increases
diagnostic likelihood of decompensated HF.
Rationale (incorrect):
B — Hemoglobin does not rule out volume overload; Hgb may
be normal while fluid overload exists.
C — Creatinine is one useful index of renal function but a
normal creatinine does not invalidate an elevated BNP;
cardiorenal interactions are complex.
D — BNP is a valid diagnostic adjunct; imaging (CXR) is useful
but not the sole diagnostic tool.


3 — Cardiovascular (post-MI medication teaching)
A client is discharged after an uncomplicated MI and is
prescribed lisinopril (an ACE inhibitor). Which teaching point is
most important for the nurse to emphasize?
A. “Take lisinopril only when you feel chest pain.”
B. “Stop the medication if you develop a dry, persistent cough.”
C. “You may feel dizzy when you first start — rise slowly and call
if severe lightheadedness.”
D. “You do not need to monitor your potassium while on this
medication.”
Answer: C. “You may feel dizzy when you first start — rise
slowly and call if severe lightheadedness.”
Rationale (correct): ACE inhibitors can cause hypotension
(especially after the first doses) and orthostatic symptoms.

, Patients should rise slowly and report severe dizziness or
syncope. Preventing falls and monitoring blood pressure are
priority teaching elements.
Rationale (incorrect):
A — ACE inhibitors are maintenance therapy; they are not for
episodic chest pain.
B — A dry cough is a known ACE inhibitor adverse effect;
however, the patient should notify the prescriber rather than
autonomously stop therapy because ACE inhibitors reduce
remodeling and mortality post-MI.
D — ACE inhibitors can increase potassium; patients (especially
those on other agents that raise potassium) may need
monitoring — it is incorrect to say monitoring isn’t needed.


4 — Cardiovascular (anticoagulation INR interpretation)
A client on warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation has an INR
result of 1.2. The nurse should interpret this as:
A. Therapeutic anticoagulation.
B. Subtherapeutic — increased risk for thromboembolism.
C. Excessively anticoagulated — risk for bleeding.
D. Within expected variation; continue current dose without
follow-up.
Answer: B. Subtherapeutic — increased risk for
thromboembolism.
$25.99
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
estonnjoka4
5.0
(1)

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
estonnjoka4 Teachme2-tutor
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
3
Member since
6 months
Number of followers
0
Documents
151
Last sold
1 month ago
NursingStudyCore

Clear, easy-to-use nursing test banks featuring textbook-aligned questions and NCLEX-style MCQs for nursing exams at every level. Focused nursing study resources made to simplify learning and strengthen exam readiness. Designed to help you study smarter and pass with confidence.

5.0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions