100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

RSE4801 Assignment 5 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE 3 November 2025; 100% correct solutions and explanations.

Rating
3.0
(1)
Sold
3
Pages
22
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
09-10-2025
Written in
2025/2026

RSE4801 Assignment 5 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE 3 November 2025; 100% correct solutions and explanations. • Word limit: 2,500-3,000 words (stick to it). • Format: Times New Roman, 12 pt, 1.5 spacing, Word document. • Referencing: Example of APA 7 in-text citation: (Neuman, 2014). Example in reference list: Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson. • Submissions: 3 attempts - use 2 to reduce Turnitin, final attempt to submit polished draft. Save as Word document; include word count and student details on the title page. • Turnitin: aim <15% similarity; paraphrase, cite everything, quote sparingly. • Use Linda Tuhiwai Smith (2012) only when you discuss decolonial / Indigenous methodological issues. Otherwise use general methodology literature. Marking rubric 1. Depth & insight - not just definitions; integrate ideas into a convincing argument (original voice). 2. Clear linkage - explicitly connect philosophical assumptions (ontology/epistemology/axiology) to method and method choice. Don’t leave the link implicit. 3. Examples & evidence - give concrete, discipline-appropriate examples that show your logic. Use examples across quantitative, qualitative, mixed, and transformative designs. 4. Use of readings - selective, relevant, integrated use of multiple readings to support points (not a list). Use Smith (2012) only where appropriate. 5. Methodological sophistication - show you know sampling, instruments, analysis, validity/trustworthiness, reflexivity, and ethics, and link these to worldview. 6. Academic presentation - structure, clarity, referencing (APA 7), paragraphs, grammar. 7. Critical evaluation - show limits of each stance and defend your argument. Recommended essay structure & word allocation (2,500–3,000 w) Use headings in your working draft to keep sections coherent (markers expect a clear logical flow). Final essay may keep headings (TL101 allowed structured essays). • Title page (not in word count) - name, student no., module, assignment, due date. • Introduction: 200-300 words What the essay will do; thesis; roadmap. • Section 1: Clarify key definitions: 200–300 words. philosophical terms: ontology, epistemology, axiology, methodology, methods • Section 2: Main philosophical positions & mapping to methods: 700–900 words. (Positivism/post-positivism, Interpretivism/Constructivism

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
October 9, 2025
Number of pages
22
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

, RSE4801 Assignment 5 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester
2 2025 - DUE 3 November 2025; 100% correct solutions and
explanations.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Defining Key Philosophical Terms
2.1 Ontology
2.2 Epistemology
2.3 Axiology
2.4 Methodology and Methods
3. Major Philosophical Positions and Methodological Choices
3.1 Positivism and Post-positivism
3.2 Interpretivism and Constructivism
3.3 Critical and Transformative Paradigms
3.4 Pragmatism and Mixed-Methods Approaches
4. Linking Research Aims, Worldview, and Methodological
Choice
4.1 Example 1: Quantitative—Post-positivist Orientation
4.2 Example 2: Qualitative—Interpretivist Orientation
4.3 Example 3: Transformative/Mixed—Critical-Pragmatic
Orientation
5. Quality, Ethics, Reflexivity, and Limitations
5.1 Quality Criteria
5.2 Ethics and Axiology
5.3 Reflexivity
5.4 Limitations
6. The Interplay Between Theory, Methodology, and Context
7. Implications for Educational Research
8. Conclusion
9. References

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
1 month ago

3.0

1 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
MasterVincent University of South Africa (Unisa)
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
2561
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
452
Documents
1529
Last sold
2 days ago
MasterVincent

On this page, you find all documents, package deals, and flashcards offered by seller MasterVincent.

4.1

375 reviews

5
205
4
68
3
50
2
24
1
28

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions