Integrale opdracht –
daderschap bij jongeren
Student: Tonja Leten
Docent: Hakim El Faissouni
Orthopedagogie
Toegepaste jeugdcriminologie
Onderwijsgroep 09
Academiejaar: 2024-2025
, Inhoudsopgave
1. INLEIDING ............................................................................................................... 2
2. CASUSANALYSE....................................................................................................... 2
2.1. KEUZE CASUS, MOTIVATIE EN TIJDLIJN ............................................................................ 2
2.2. RISICO-EN BESCHERMENDE FACTOREN EN RNR-MODEL .................................................... 2
2.2.1. BESCHERMENDE FACTOREN: ................................................................................... 2
2.2.2. RISK .................................................................................................................. 3
2.2.3. NEED ................................................................................................................. 4
2.2.4. RESPONSIVITY ..................................................................................................... 4
2.3. GOOD LIVES MODEL .................................................................................................. 5
2.3.1. PRIMARY EN SECONDARY GOODS.............................................................................. 5
2.3.2. FLAWS ............................................................................................................... 5
2.4. DESISTANCE ........................................................................................................... 6
2.5. ONDERSTEUNINGSVRAAG EN ARGUMENTATIE .................................................................. 7
2.5.1. VRAGEN EN NODEN VAN DE JONGERE ......................................................................... 7
2.5.2. ONDERSTEUNINGSVRAAG ....................................................................................... 7
3. REACTIE OP DELICT EN PRAKTIJK .............................................................................. 7
3.1.1. REACTIE OP HET DELICT .......................................................................................... 7
3.2. BEGELEIDINGSMETHODIEK ......................................................................................... 8
4. BESLUIT ................................................................................................................... 8
5. BIJLAGE ................................................................................................................... 9
5.1. BIJLAGE 1: VOLLEDIGE CASUS ...................................................................................... 9
5.2. BIJLAGE 2: TIJDLIJN ................................................................................................. 11
5.3. BIJLAGE 3: LITERATUURLIJST ..................................................................................... 12
Integrale opdracht – Daderschap bij jongeren 1 Tonja Leten
daderschap bij jongeren
Student: Tonja Leten
Docent: Hakim El Faissouni
Orthopedagogie
Toegepaste jeugdcriminologie
Onderwijsgroep 09
Academiejaar: 2024-2025
, Inhoudsopgave
1. INLEIDING ............................................................................................................... 2
2. CASUSANALYSE....................................................................................................... 2
2.1. KEUZE CASUS, MOTIVATIE EN TIJDLIJN ............................................................................ 2
2.2. RISICO-EN BESCHERMENDE FACTOREN EN RNR-MODEL .................................................... 2
2.2.1. BESCHERMENDE FACTOREN: ................................................................................... 2
2.2.2. RISK .................................................................................................................. 3
2.2.3. NEED ................................................................................................................. 4
2.2.4. RESPONSIVITY ..................................................................................................... 4
2.3. GOOD LIVES MODEL .................................................................................................. 5
2.3.1. PRIMARY EN SECONDARY GOODS.............................................................................. 5
2.3.2. FLAWS ............................................................................................................... 5
2.4. DESISTANCE ........................................................................................................... 6
2.5. ONDERSTEUNINGSVRAAG EN ARGUMENTATIE .................................................................. 7
2.5.1. VRAGEN EN NODEN VAN DE JONGERE ......................................................................... 7
2.5.2. ONDERSTEUNINGSVRAAG ....................................................................................... 7
3. REACTIE OP DELICT EN PRAKTIJK .............................................................................. 7
3.1.1. REACTIE OP HET DELICT .......................................................................................... 7
3.2. BEGELEIDINGSMETHODIEK ......................................................................................... 8
4. BESLUIT ................................................................................................................... 8
5. BIJLAGE ................................................................................................................... 9
5.1. BIJLAGE 1: VOLLEDIGE CASUS ...................................................................................... 9
5.2. BIJLAGE 2: TIJDLIJN ................................................................................................. 11
5.3. BIJLAGE 3: LITERATUURLIJST ..................................................................................... 12
Integrale opdracht – Daderschap bij jongeren 1 Tonja Leten
