INC4805 Assignment 4
Literature review
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
2025 - DUE October
2025
[Document subtitle]
[School]
[Course title]
, INC4805 Assignment 4 Literature review (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE October 2025
Course
Research in Inclusive Education (INC4805)
Institution
University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Book
Inclusive Education
INC4805 Assignment 4 Literature review (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE October 2025 ;
100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
Provide a well-structured and well-considered review of literature related to your research
problem. Again, explain methods you plan to use to investigate the research problem you have
identified. The following guidelines should help you in writing your literature review and
methodology section: i. Identify 12 to 15 sources that are relevant to the problem you identified
in Assignment 03. (These sources must have been published between 2017 and 2025. They
should be scholarly articles/chapters/books or policies. Avoid using textbooks.) ii. Review the
sources. iii. Provide a detailed discussion of the methods you plan to use to investigate the
research problem you have identified. Note the following: • Focus on literature that is relevant
to your research problem. • Cite evidence to support any statement you make. • Summarise
and critique the literature; do not simply reproduce the work of other authors verbatim. •
Literature review
Overview and rationale
Physical activity (PA) in school settings is a major public-health and educational lever: it
improves health and—contrary to common concern—does not harm academic outcomes and
may improve them. Reviews and umbrella reviews show generally positive or neutral effects of
school-based PA on academic achievement and cognitive outcomes; moderate-to-vigorous PA
(MVPA) and programmes adding substantial weekly minutes show the clearest benefits. PMC+1
1. Evidence that PA supports academic performance
An umbrella review and multiple systematic reviews conclude PA is at worst neutral and often
beneficial for academic outcomes—especially numeracy and executive functions—when
programmes add time or intensity (e.g., ≥90 min/week or 30–60 min per session at MVPA).
Literature review
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
2025 - DUE October
2025
[Document subtitle]
[School]
[Course title]
, INC4805 Assignment 4 Literature review (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE October 2025
Course
Research in Inclusive Education (INC4805)
Institution
University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Book
Inclusive Education
INC4805 Assignment 4 Literature review (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE October 2025 ;
100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
Provide a well-structured and well-considered review of literature related to your research
problem. Again, explain methods you plan to use to investigate the research problem you have
identified. The following guidelines should help you in writing your literature review and
methodology section: i. Identify 12 to 15 sources that are relevant to the problem you identified
in Assignment 03. (These sources must have been published between 2017 and 2025. They
should be scholarly articles/chapters/books or policies. Avoid using textbooks.) ii. Review the
sources. iii. Provide a detailed discussion of the methods you plan to use to investigate the
research problem you have identified. Note the following: • Focus on literature that is relevant
to your research problem. • Cite evidence to support any statement you make. • Summarise
and critique the literature; do not simply reproduce the work of other authors verbatim. •
Literature review
Overview and rationale
Physical activity (PA) in school settings is a major public-health and educational lever: it
improves health and—contrary to common concern—does not harm academic outcomes and
may improve them. Reviews and umbrella reviews show generally positive or neutral effects of
school-based PA on academic achievement and cognitive outcomes; moderate-to-vigorous PA
(MVPA) and programmes adding substantial weekly minutes show the clearest benefits. PMC+1
1. Evidence that PA supports academic performance
An umbrella review and multiple systematic reviews conclude PA is at worst neutral and often
beneficial for academic outcomes—especially numeracy and executive functions—when
programmes add time or intensity (e.g., ≥90 min/week or 30–60 min per session at MVPA).
