100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

HRPYC81 Project 2 Assignment 4 (FINAL RESEARCH REPORT ANSWERS) 2025

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
20
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
25-09-2025
Written in
2025/2026

Time perspectives: an underlying factor of human behaviours Research Area Cognitive Psychology Number of Students Limited to 400 students Project Description Humans have a unique ability to transcend the present and mentally project themselves through time, a characteristic distinguishing us from other animals (Stolarski et al., 2018, p. 593). This capacity to perceive and conceive time has intrigued psychologists throughout the history of scientific psychology, leading to research on time perspective and its incorporation into psychological theories (e.g., William James, 1890; Piaget, 1946; Kurt Lewin, 1942; Bandura et al., 1997; cited from Stolarski et al., 2018). For instance, Kurt Lewin’s famous life space model considered that our perceptions of the past and the future (i.e., time frames) influence our current behaviour. He defined time perspective (also known as time orientation) as “the totality of the individual’s views of his psychological future and psychological past existing at a given time” (Lewin, 1951, p. 75; cited from Zimbardo & Boyd, 2014). Likewise, Bandura’s self-efficacy theory (1997) proposes that efficacy beliefs are “grounded in past experiences, current appraisals, and reflections on future options (cited from Zimbardo & Boyd, 2014). One could argue that time perspective is essential in most psychological theories beyond developmental models in psychology. Zimbardo and colleagues proposed a broad conceptualization of time perspective, namely “as a foundational process in both individual and societal functioning” (Zimbardo & Boyd, 2014, p. 18). More specifically, they argue that time perspective is a cognitive process through which the continual flows of personal and social experiences are assigned to time frames (past, present, future), which gives order, coherence, and meaning to those events. Zimbardo (2008) further argues that time perspective presents a trait-like variable, distinguishing between individuals primarily focusing on the past, present, or future time frame. Time perspective influences how we encode, store, and recall experiences, shaping our expectations, goals, contingencies, and imaginative scenarios. It also affects how we experience the present, impacting factors such as life satisfaction (e.g., Shmotkin, 1991), resilience (e.g., Hatala et al., 2017), health and risk-taking (e.g., Boyd & Zimbardo, 2006; Keough, 1999; Zimbardo et al., 1997), innovation (e.g., Barreto et al., 2022), consumer behaviour (Xu-Priour et al., 2017), decision-making (e.g., Lin et al., 2019), mood (Stolarski et al., 2013; Stolarski et al., 2018), and affective polarization in political communication (Garzón‐Velandia et al., 2024). Interindividual and cultural differences shape time perspectives (Sircova et al., 2015). Thus, measuring cultural (or any group) differences necessitates a reliable and valid instrument, such as the Zimbardo Time Perspectives Inventory (ZTPI). This instrument has been tested across different cultural and societal contexts (e.g., Liniauskaitė & Kairys, 2009; Sircova et al., 2015; Skogen & Nesvåg, 2019), including South Africa (Keyser, 2017). The Zimbardo Time Perspectives Inventory (Zimbardo & Boyd, 2014) identifies five dimensions of time perspective: past negative, past positive, present hedonistic, present fatalistic and future dimensions. In this research project, we will apply the Zimbardo Time Perspectives Inventory to examine how the different time perspective dimensions are related to outcome

Show more Read less
Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
September 25, 2025
Number of pages
20
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

HRPYC81 Project 2
Assignment 4 (FINAL
RESEARCH REPORT
ANSWERS) 2025

For assistance contact
Email:

,The sentence can be completed as:
"...to examine how the different time perspective dimensions are related to outcomes such
as academic performance, psychological well-being, and career decision-making among
university students in South Africa."
Here is a structured research project proposal based on the description provided.


Research Project Proposal: Time Perspectives and Student Outcomes
1. Project Title
Time Perspectives as an Underlying Factor of Student Behaviours: A Study of Academic
Performance, Well-being, and Career Decisiveness.
2. Research Problem and Rationale
As established, time perspective (TP) is a fundamental cognitive process that shapes how
individuals interpret experiences and make decisions. While extensively studied globally, its
specific manifestations and impacts within the diverse South African higher education context
require further exploration. University students are at a critical life stage where their temporal
focus—whether dwelling on past successes or failures, seeking present pleasures, or striving for
future goals—can significantly influence their academic trajectory, mental health, and future
planning. Understanding these relationships can inform the development of targeted
interventions to enhance student success and well-being.
3. Research Aims and Objectives
 Primary Aim: To investigate the relationship between Zimbardo's five time perspective
profiles (Past-Negative, Past-Positive, Present-Hedonistic, Present-Fatalistic, Future) and
key student outcomes.
 Specific Objectives:
1. To measure the dominant time perspectives among a sample of South African
university students using the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI).
2. To examine the correlation between each TP dimension and academic
performance (as measured by self-reported GPA).
3. To analyse the relationship between TP profiles and psychological well-being
(e.g., using scales for life satisfaction, resilience, and stress).
4. To investigate how TP influences career decision-making self-efficacy and
decisiveness.
5. To explore potential variations in TP profiles based on demographic factors such
as culture, year of study, and field of study.

, 4. Literature Review (Summary of Key Themes)
The project is grounded in the foundational work of Zimbardo and Boyd (1999, 2014), which
posits TP as a stable individual difference. The literature shows:
 Future TP is consistently linked to positive outcomes like higher academic achievement,
better health behaviours, and lower risk-taking (Zimbardo & Boyd, 1999; Boyd &
Zimbardo, 2006).
 Past-Positive TP is associated with optimism and high self-esteem, while Past-Negative
TP is linked to depression, anxiety, and lower well-being (Shmotkin, 1991; Stolarski et
al., 2013).
 Present-Hedonistic TP correlates with risk-taking and impulsivity, whereas Present-
Fatalistic TP is associated with hopelessness, depression, and academic apathy (Keough,
1999; Zimbardo et al., 1997).
 Cross-cultural studies (Sircova et al., 2015) confirm that TP profiles vary across societies,
highlighting the need for localized research, such as the preliminary work in South Africa
by Keyser (2017).
5. Hypotheses
Based on the literature, we hypothesize that:
1. A balanced time perspective (BTP) profile will be positively correlated with higher
psychological well-being and academic performance.
2. Future and Past-Positive TPs will be significant positive predictors of academic
performance (GPA).
3. Past-Negative and Present-Fatalistic TPs will be significant negative predictors of
psychological well-being and career decisiveness.
4. Present-Hedonistic TP will show a mixed relationship, positively correlating with social
well-being but negatively with consistent academic effort.
6. Methodology
 Research Design: A quantitative, cross-sectional correlational design.
 Participants: Up to 400 undergraduate students from a South African university,
recruited through convenience sampling across various faculties.
 Instruments:
o Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI): A 56-item scale measuring the
five TP factors (Zimbardo & Boyd, 1999).
o Academic Performance: Self-reported Grade Point Average (GPA).

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
gabrielmusyoka940 db
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
1467
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
247
Documents
1488
Last sold
1 day ago
Bstudy

provides latest exam paper

3.2

216 reviews

5
68
4
30
3
49
2
20
1
49

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions