Answers
1. Mapp v. Ohio A landmark case in the area of U.S. criminal procedure, in which the United
States Supreme Court decided that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth
Amendment protection against "unreasonable searches and seizures" may not be
used in criminal prosecutions in state courts, as well as federal courts.
2. Terry v. Ohio A policeman had been undercover observing Terry and three other men who were
suspected of carrying concealed weapons. Terry was arrested. Terry presented a
threat to the police. Result: The search and seizure was perfectly legal because
the policeman had more than a hunch. The search was limited and the purpose
was for the oflcer's safety in the investigation. - Terry pat down. - not protected
by the 14th A.
3. Under a warrant, 72 hrs
how long to bring
someone before
judicial officer?
4. Without warrant, 48 hrs
how long to bring
someone before
judicial officer?
5. Judges that may City, State, Superior, Magistrate
issue warrant:
6. Warrant must be probable cause
issued on...
7. Warrant applica- Called when a non-leo or judge makes a warrant
tion hearing
8. the offense is committed in his presence or within his immediate knowledge
, GPSTC Class 290 Exam 3 UPDATED ACTUAL Questions and CORRECT
Answers
A private person
may arrest an of-
fender when...
9. If offenses is a A reasonable ground for suspicion
felony and the
offender is at-
tempting to es-
cape, a private
citizen may ar-
rest him based
on...
10. Immunity from Legislators are privileged from arrest while Congress is "in session" with respect
arrest to offenses punishable by up to 6 years of imprisonment. Thus, whether Congress
is in regular or special session, the immunity from arrest applies.
11. Privilege of Mili- May immune from arrest during and coming from parades meetings, encamp-
tia ments and election of oflcers except in cases of felony, treason or breach of the
peace.
12. Diplomatic Im- Practice in international law under which ambassadors and other diplomatic
munity oflcials have special privileges and are not subject to the laws of the state to which
they are accredited.
13. The right of "likely" to be found
an officer to
search is not lim-
ited to where
weapons and ev-
idence are...
14.