100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

PS2021 Lecture 3: Judgement

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
10
Uploaded on
15-09-2025
Written in
2024/2025

This is not a copy-and-paste of the lecture slides for an easy cash grab. These are highly detailed notes that I ensured cover the exam marking range. It includes basic definitions, a simple explanation of the main lecture topics, supporting empirical evidence from the last 5 years, and critical thinking. This document aims to capture the lecture, reading list, and wider reading to confidently assure yourself of a possible 2:1 or 1st mark for this topic. If you have any questions about the notes, you can get in contact with me, and my support is perpetual to you.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Unknown
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
September 15, 2025
Number of pages
10
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Dr philip solomon-turay
Contains
All classes

Subjects

Content preview

⚖️
3. Judgement
Created @August 21, 2025 1:49 AM

Class PS2021

Judgement: An assessment of the probability of a given event occured based
on incomplete information



Heuristics and Biases Approach
Gigerenzer & Gaissmaier (2011)
Heuristics: Strategies that ignore part of the information, with the goal of
making decisions more quickly, frugally and/or accurately than more complex
methods
Reduce the effort associated with cognitive tasks


Representativeness Heuristics
Representativeness Heuristic: The assumption that an object or individual
belongs to a specified category because it is representative of that category


The Conjunction Fallacy: The mistaken assumption that the probability of a
conjunction for two events is greater than the probability of one of them

Empirical Studies and Evaluation
Point Method Results Conclusion

Tversky and Scenario: Linda 85% Undergraduates Tentori et al. (2013)
Kahneman (1983) is 31 years old, judged the second CF occured
single, statement to be true because of the high
Evidence for The outspoken and despite its statistical perceived
Conjunction Fallacy very bright. unlikelihood probability of the
how people rely on Major in additional




3. Judgement 1

, representativeness philosophy and information
heuristics rather concerned about
than logical social issues. The hypothesis that
reasoning in Linda is a feminist
probabilistic They were then activist is strongly
situations asked to judge supported by her
which of two description (black
statements was shoes and bank
more probable: teller variation)
(1) Linda is a
bank teller, or (2)
Linda is a bank
teller and is
active in the
feminist
movement.

150 medical
practitioners
(Doctors and
specialists)


Mixed-method
approach:
combining
A significant
surveys and
Johnson & percentage of
simulated
Thompson (2021) participants FR: Need for
clinical
demonstrated awareness and
scenarios where
Clinicians rely on this reliance on the training to mitigate
participants were
cognitive shortcut representativeness the risks associated
asked to
when making heuristic, particularly with the
diagnose a set of
diagnostic in ambiguous cases representativeness
patients based
decisions, for atypical heuristic in clinical
on presented
potentially leading to symptoms in practice.
symptoms
misdiagnoses common conditions

Measured
diagnostic
accuracy by
comparing
participants’
responses to the
correct
diagnoses




3. Judgement 2
$18.81
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
MyTapeWormTellsMeWhatToDo

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
MyTapeWormTellsMeWhatToDo Royal Holloway University of London (South East)
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
11
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions