100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

PS2021 Lecture 2: Reasoning

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
12
Uploaded on
15-09-2025
Written in
2025/2026

This is not a copy-and-paste of the lecture slides for an easy cash grab. These are highly detailed notes that I ensured cover the exam marking range. It includes basic definitions, a simple explanation of the main lecture topics, supporting empirical evidence from the last 5 years, and critical thinking. This document aims to capture the lecture, reading list, and wider reading to confidently assure yourself of a possible 2:1 or 1st mark for this topic. If you have any questions about the notes, you can get in contact with me, and my support is perpetual to you.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Unknown
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
September 15, 2025
Number of pages
12
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Unknown
Contains
All classes

Subjects

Content preview

♟️
2. Reasoning
Created @August 21, 2025 1:48 AM

Class PS2021

Reasoning is a process of thought that yields a conclusion from percepts,
thoughts, or assertions



Deductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning:

Reasoning involves drawing a conclusion from given statements
• The conclusion is based on the assumption that the statements are true.
• If the statements hold, the conclusion logically follows.
Informal Reasoning: A form of reasoning based on one’s relevant knowledge
and experience rather than logic


Conditional Reasoning
Conditional reasoning:
Empirical Studies Testing the Dual
Deductive reasoning using if-
Source Reasoning Model
then propositions
Singmann et al. (2016)

Conditional reasoning problems
Klauer et al. (2010) proposed
a dual-source model of Rating conclusion likelihood on a 0-
conditional reasoning 100% scale

Combines: Results: knowledge-based processes
knowledge-based outweighed form-based ones
process influenced by
premise content
Markovits et al. (2013)




2. Reasoning 1

, form-based process Tested affirmation of the consequent
influenced by logical (invalid conclusion) with examples:
structure
1. If rock thrown → window breaks.
These operate alongside Window broken. Therefore, rock
an intuitive statistical thrown.
strategy using
2. If finger cut → it bleeds. Finger
probabilistic reasoning
bleeding. Therefore, finger was cut.
from relevant knowledge
Using statistical strategy, participants more
often accepted invalid conclusion in problem
2 - higher subjective probability.
Using counterexample strategy,
participants accepted problem 2's
conclusion - fewer counterexamples
conflicting valid conclusion (windows have
many breaking causes).
The model shows counterexample strategy
requires more cognitive effort than
statistical strategy - CS used in 49% of
unlimited-time trials vs only 1.7% with time
limits


Conditional Reasoning Research Evaluation
Limitation Explanation

Research involves
Future research: avoid instructing participants to disregard
instructions indicating
relevant knowledge with CR problems
context is irrelevant

Traditional research
Khemlani and Johnson-Laird (2017)
required participants to
Goals and preferences are ignored as denial of the first part of
draw definite
a statement is not valid in traditional logic
conclusions (true or
I.e., Q is only probably with ONLY P
false)



Wason Selection Task
In a task with four cards (R,
Evaluations of poor performance:
G, 2, 7), each has a letter on



2. Reasoning 2
$18.81
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
MyTapeWormTellsMeWhatToDo

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
MyTapeWormTellsMeWhatToDo Royal Holloway University of London (South East)
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
11
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions