LSAT - Logical Reasoning/ LSAT Logical Reasoning Drill Pack/ Combo with "LSAT PRACTICE QUESTIONS" and 1 other — 200 Questions + Brief Explanations With complete solution New!! 2025/2026

LSAT - Logical Reasoning/ LSAT Logical Reasoning Drill
Pack/ Combo with "LSAT PRACTICE QUESTIONS" and 1
other — 200 Ques)ons + Brief Explana)ons With
complete solu)on New!! 2025/2026
Premise - Answers A fact, proposi on or statement from which a conclusion is made



Conclusion - Answers A statement or judgment that follows from one or more reasons.



Condi onal Reasoning - Answers A condi onal statement is, in its most easily recognized form,
an "if...then..." statement. The following is, for example, a condi onal statement. Condi onal
statements are also described in terms of sufficient and necessary condi ons.



Sufficient - Answers An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary
condi on must also occur.



Necessary - Answers An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a
sufficient condi on to occur.



Explain Sufficient Necessary - Answers If a sufficient condi on occurs, you automa cally know
that the necessary condi on also occurs. If a necessary condi on occurs, then it is possible that
the sufficient condi on will occur, but not certain.



Example of Sufficient Necessary - Answers Banging my shin on the table is all that is needed for
me to scream in pain (i.e. it is sufficient), so banging my shin is considered the sufficient
condi on. I cannot bang my shin on the table without screaming in pain (screaming necessarily
follows the banging of my shin), so screaming in pain is the necessary condi on. You should be
fine if you can simply remember that the antecedent (the phrase following the "if") is the
sufficient condi on for the consequent (the phrase following the "then") and the consequent is
the necessary condi on for the antecedent.

, Contra-posi ve - Answers a condi onal statement derived from another by nega ng and
interchanging antecedent and consequent



Premise Indicators - Answers Because

Since

For

For example

For that reason that In that

Given that

As indicated by

Due to

Owing to

This can be seen from

We know this by



Conclusion Indicators - Answers Thus

Therefore

Hence

Consequently

As a result

So

Accordingly

Clearly

Must be that

Shows that

,Conclude that

Follows that

For this reason



Thirteen Logical Reasoning Types - Answers 1. Must Be True / Most Supported

2. Main Point

3. Point at issue

4. Assump on

5. Jus fy the conclusion

6. Strengthen / support

7. Resolve the paradox

8. Weaken

9. Method of reasoning

10. Flaw in the reasoning

11. Parallel reasoning

12. Evaluate the argument

13. Cannot be true



Four Family Types - Answers 1. Prove

2. Help

3. Hurt

4. Disprove



Reasoning Types - Family - Prove - Answers a. Must Be True / Most Supported

b. Main Point

c. Point at issue

, d. Method of reasoning

e. Flaw in the reasoning

f. Parallel reasoning



Reasoning Types - Family - Help - Answers a. Assump on

b. Jus fy the conclusion

c. Strengthen / support

d. Resolve the paradox



Reasoning Types - Family - Hurt - Answers a. Weaken



Reasoning Types - Family - Disprove - Answers a. Cannot be true



Must Be True / Most Supported - Answers This category is simply known as "must be true".
Must be true ques ons ask you to iden fy the answer choice that is best proven by the
informa on in the s mulus. Ques on stem examples - "if the statements above are true, which
one of the following must also be true?" - which one of the following can be properly inferred
from the passage?"



Main Point - Answers Main Point ques ons are variant of Must Be True ques ons. As you
might expect, a main point ques on asks you to find the primary conclusion made by the
author. Ques on stem example - "the main point of the argument is that"



Point at issue - Answers Point at issue ques ons require you to iden fy a point of conten on
between two speakers, and thus these ques ons appear almost exclusively with two-speaker
s mulus. Ques on stem example: "larew and Mendota disagree about whether"