100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

COL3704 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE 15 September 2025

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
10
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
10-09-2025
Written in
2025/2026

I asked Co-pilot to write an essay of 200 words on the following topic: ‘With reference to the prescribed case law, critically evaluate whether the stated purpose of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 is achieved.’ Below is the response that I received from Co-pilot. The National Credit Act 34 of 2005 (NCA) was enacted to promote responsible credit lending, protect consumers from reckless credit practices, and ensure transparency in credit agreements. In Kaknis v Absa Bank Ltd & Another [2016] ZASCA 206, the Supreme Court of Appeal examined whether section 126B(1)(b), introduced by the National Credit Amendment Act 19 of 2014, applied retrospectively to debts that had prescribed under the Prescription Act 68 of 1969. The appellant argued that the acknowledgment of debt revived a prescribed debt, which contravened section 126B. However, the court held that the section did not apply retrospectively and upheld the summary judgment against the appellant. This case illustrates a limitation in achieving the NCA’s stated purpose. While the Act aims to protect consumers from unfair debt collection practices, the court’s interpretation allowed creditors to enforce prescribed debts through post-prescription acknowledgments, potentially undermining consumer protection. Although the NCA has made strides in regulating credit providers and promoting financial literacy, inconsistent enforcement and interpretative gaps—such as the non-retrospective application of protective provisions—hinder its full effectiveness. Therefore, while the NCA has achieved many of its goals, cases like Kaknis reveal areas where its protective intent may be compromised by judicial interpretation. Write a 300-word essay in which you indicate how the answer given above by Co-pilot can be improved. Provide detailed references as per the approved School of Law referencing style of all the sources that you personally read and used in your answer. TOTAL FOR SECTION A: 10 MARKS SECTION C: THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 68 OF 2008 QUESTION 2 You received a catalogue by post from a supplier of wines. You are interested in buying five bottles of red wine on offer in the catalogue. In terms of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008, indicate the information the supplier must provide to you as a consumer. Also indicate the relevant section(s) of the Consumer Protection Act that is/are applicable. (5) Page 5 of 5 QUESTION 3 Glenda sees an imported dress from Paris at shop in an upmarket South African shopping mall. She agrees with the owner that she would pay the dress in periodic instalments over 6 months whereafter she will take delivery of the dress. The retailer agrees to keep the dress until Glenda has paid the full purchase price. After Glenda paid four instalments, the dress is badly damaged by a leaking pipe in the store. The store manager informs Glenda that she carries the risk for the damaged dress as she has already paid four instalments. With reference to the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008, discuss Glenda’ s rights as a consumer. (5) TOTAL FOR SECTION B: 10 MARKS SECTION D: CONSUMER GROUPINGS QUESTION 4 Zamambo is a member of Bayazi Burial Society. Members pay a monthly contribution of R900 (consisting of R350 for groceries, R150 for meat and R400 for investments) and meet every first Sunday of the month. The founder of the burial society, Ms Ingrid, collects the contributions and deposits the money into her personal bank account. Zamambo is behind with her monthly contributions for two months. Advise Zamambo on the legal nature of burial societies. TOTAL FOR SECTION D: 5 MARKS SECTION E: INSURANCE QUESTION 5 Discuss the nature of an interim insurance contract, and in what respects does it differ from a regular insurance contract?

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
September 10, 2025
Number of pages
10
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

COL3704 Assignment 2
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2025 - DUE 15
September 2025


FOR FURTHER ASSISTANCE
PLEASE CONTACT



, Assignment: National Credit Act, Consumer
Protection Act, Consumer Groupings, and
Insurance Law

SECTION A (10 Marks)
Question 1

Critique of Co-Pilot’s Essay on the National Credit Act 34 of 2005

The response provided by Co-Pilot demonstrates a fair attempt at critically engaging with the
National Credit Act 34 of 2005 (NCA) and the prescribed case law. However, several
improvements are necessary to strengthen the argument, broaden its scope, and comply with
academic referencing standards.

First, the essay focuses exclusively on Kaknis v Absa Bank Ltd & Another [2016] ZASCA 206,
without adequately contextualising how the case connects to the core purposes of the NCA. The
Act’s objectives—such as promoting responsible credit granting, preventing reckless lending,
ensuring transparency in consumer credit agreements, and protecting vulnerable consumers (s 3
of the NCA)—should have been highlighted at the outset. This would provide a framework
against which the Kaknis decision could be evaluated.

Second, while the case is correctly discussed, Co-Pilot’s answer fails to engage with other
relevant jurisprudence. For instance, in National Credit Regulator v Nedbank Ltd 2009 (6) SA
295 (GNP), the court underscored the NCA’s role in curbing reckless lending. Similarly, Ferris
v Firstrand Bank Ltd 2014 (3) SA 39 (CC) considered debt review provisions under the Act,
providing insights into the Act’s protective intent. Including these cases would allow for a more
balanced assessment of whether the Act’s objectives are achieved.

Third, the essay could be improved by acknowledging scholarly criticism. Authors such as
Kelly-Louw (2012) argue that while the NCA represents a significant step in consumer
protection, its enforcement remains inconsistent due to judicial interpretation and lack of
consumer awareness.

Finally, referencing should follow the approved School of Law style. The response should cite
cases in full and include a bibliography. For example:

 Kaknis v Absa Bank Ltd and Another [2016] ZASCA 206.
 National Credit Regulator v Nedbank Ltd 2009 (6) SA 295 (GNP).
 Ferris v Firstrand Bank Ltd 2014 (3) SA 39 (CC).

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
kevinlugwiri98 Teachme2-tutor
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
28
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
100
Last sold
2 months ago

3.5

4 reviews

5
2
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions