lOMoAR cPSD| 32110785
Downloaded by Vincent Cosmas ()
, lOMoAR cPSD| 32110785
PART A (MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS)
Question 1
(a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.2 (vi).
(b) This statement is incorrect. See SG 1.2.7. Dolus
eventualis is a sufficient form of intention.
(c) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.6.
You should, therefore, have chosen option (4) since only
statements (a) and (c) are correct.
Question 2
(a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4.
(b) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4.
(c) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4.
You should, therefore, have chosen option (5) since all the
statements are correct.
Question 3
(a) This statement is incorrect. See SG 10.1.7. The
Appellate division in Heyne 1956 (3) SA 604 (A)
Downloaded by Vincent Cosmas ()
Downloaded by Vincent Cosmas ()
, lOMoAR cPSD| 32110785
PART A (MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS)
Question 1
(a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.2 (vi).
(b) This statement is incorrect. See SG 1.2.7. Dolus
eventualis is a sufficient form of intention.
(c) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.6.
You should, therefore, have chosen option (4) since only
statements (a) and (c) are correct.
Question 2
(a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4.
(b) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4.
(c) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4.
You should, therefore, have chosen option (5) since all the
statements are correct.
Question 3
(a) This statement is incorrect. See SG 10.1.7. The
Appellate division in Heyne 1956 (3) SA 604 (A)
Downloaded by Vincent Cosmas ()