D370 IT Leadership Foundations TASK 1
LEADERSHIP REFLECTION USING CLIFTON
STRENGTHS ANALYSIS 2025-2026 new update
verified Passed Western Governors University
D370 Task 1
D370: Task 1
Leadership Reflection Based on CliftonStrengths
A1. Discussion of the Five Categorical Strengths
The CliftonStrengths assessment identified my top five strengths as Strategic, Restorative,
Relator, Futuristic, and Harmony (Gallup, 2025). Together, these strengths shape my leadership
identity as a thoughtful, visionary, and relationship-focused IT manager. The Strategic theme
falls under the domain of Strategic Thinking and suggests I am adept at recognizing patterns and
developing clear paths forward in complex situations. This strength empowers me to navigate
ambiguity and create order by quickly evaluating options and identifying the most efficient route.
Restorative, an Executing theme, indicates my problem-solving nature and desire to address
inefficiencies or breakdowns. I enjoy the challenge of diagnosing and fixing issues, and I find
fulfillment in helping people or systems recover and thrive.
, The third strength, Relator, is within the Relationship Building domain and reflects my tendency
to build trust-based connections with those around me. I prefer meaningful, long-term
relationships and often work most effectively with those I know well. This enhances team
cohesion and loyalty. My fourth strength, Futuristic, also in the Strategic Thinking domain,
means I am energized by thinking about what is possible. I find motivation in envisioning and
planning for long-term goals, and I use this skill to inspire and align others with a shared future
vision. Lastly, Harmony—another Relationship Building strength—guides me to seek consensus
and avoid unnecessary conflict. I prioritize collaboration and peace within the team and work to
ensure that all voices are heard. Collectively, these five strengths position me to be a strategic
planner, empathetic collaborator, and forward-thinking leader who uses both vision and
emotional intelligence to guide team performance.
A2. Influence of Strengths in the Innovatech Scenario
In the Innovatech Solutions scenario, these strengths directly influence how I would manage the
transition to new processes. My Strategic strength would be crucial in developing a phased,
actionable implementation plan that accounts for team dynamics and process risks. I would
examine the inefficiencies that delayed the recent project and then map out alternative methods
to ensure faster delivery in future initiatives. My approach would involve evaluating workflows,
communication gaps, and the sequence of training and implementation to reduce friction across
the team.
With my Restorative strength, I would actively work to identify and resolve barriers that are
impeding progress. This could include coaching project coordinators who are overwhelmed,
evaluating resource distribution, and offering tactical fixes to reduce pain points. I would view
the resistance from experienced developers not as defiance but as a solvable challenge—perhaps
rooted in a lack of trust or clarity—and aim to address their concerns systematically.
LEADERSHIP REFLECTION USING CLIFTON
STRENGTHS ANALYSIS 2025-2026 new update
verified Passed Western Governors University
D370 Task 1
D370: Task 1
Leadership Reflection Based on CliftonStrengths
A1. Discussion of the Five Categorical Strengths
The CliftonStrengths assessment identified my top five strengths as Strategic, Restorative,
Relator, Futuristic, and Harmony (Gallup, 2025). Together, these strengths shape my leadership
identity as a thoughtful, visionary, and relationship-focused IT manager. The Strategic theme
falls under the domain of Strategic Thinking and suggests I am adept at recognizing patterns and
developing clear paths forward in complex situations. This strength empowers me to navigate
ambiguity and create order by quickly evaluating options and identifying the most efficient route.
Restorative, an Executing theme, indicates my problem-solving nature and desire to address
inefficiencies or breakdowns. I enjoy the challenge of diagnosing and fixing issues, and I find
fulfillment in helping people or systems recover and thrive.
, The third strength, Relator, is within the Relationship Building domain and reflects my tendency
to build trust-based connections with those around me. I prefer meaningful, long-term
relationships and often work most effectively with those I know well. This enhances team
cohesion and loyalty. My fourth strength, Futuristic, also in the Strategic Thinking domain,
means I am energized by thinking about what is possible. I find motivation in envisioning and
planning for long-term goals, and I use this skill to inspire and align others with a shared future
vision. Lastly, Harmony—another Relationship Building strength—guides me to seek consensus
and avoid unnecessary conflict. I prioritize collaboration and peace within the team and work to
ensure that all voices are heard. Collectively, these five strengths position me to be a strategic
planner, empathetic collaborator, and forward-thinking leader who uses both vision and
emotional intelligence to guide team performance.
A2. Influence of Strengths in the Innovatech Scenario
In the Innovatech Solutions scenario, these strengths directly influence how I would manage the
transition to new processes. My Strategic strength would be crucial in developing a phased,
actionable implementation plan that accounts for team dynamics and process risks. I would
examine the inefficiencies that delayed the recent project and then map out alternative methods
to ensure faster delivery in future initiatives. My approach would involve evaluating workflows,
communication gaps, and the sequence of training and implementation to reduce friction across
the team.
With my Restorative strength, I would actively work to identify and resolve barriers that are
impeding progress. This could include coaching project coordinators who are overwhelmed,
evaluating resource distribution, and offering tactical fixes to reduce pain points. I would view
the resistance from experienced developers not as defiance but as a solvable challenge—perhaps
rooted in a lack of trust or clarity—and aim to address their concerns systematically.
