100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

EDEXCEL A-Level Pure Mathematics Paper 2 2025 - Mark Scheme

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
38
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
05-09-2025
Written in
2025/2026

This document contains the Pearson Edexcel A-level Pure Mathematics 2 Paper 2, Mark Scheme (MS) for the 2025 exam series. Get yours now to aid in revision and upcoming mocks! *Question Paper (QP) for this document is also available for purchase individually or in a package deal with MS.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
September 5, 2025
Number of pages
38
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

ALEVELPAPERZ2025




Mark Scheme (Results)


Summer 2025




Pearson Edexcel GCE
In Mathematics (9MA0)

Paper 02 Pure Mathematics

,ALEVELPAPERZ2025

Question Scheme Marks AOs

1 ( ) (
2 x x 2 − 12 x + 20 or x 2 x 2 − 24 x + 40 ) B1 1.1b
x 2 − 12 x + 20 = ( x − 2 )( x − 10 )
M1 1.1b
or e.g. 2 x 2 − 24 x + 40 = ( 2 x − 4 )( x − 10 )
2 x ( x − 2 )( x − 10 ) A1 1.1b
(3)
(3 marks)
Notes
B1: Takes a factor of 2x or x out of the given cubic correctly.
( )
Dividing by 2 and then achieving x x 2 − 12 x + 20 does not score this mark unless recovered.
M1: Attempts to factorise their quadratic. Invisible brackets may be implied by later work.
Score for ( x ± b )( x ± d ) where bd = 20 coming from x 2 ± 12 x ± 20
or for ( ax ± b )( cx ± d ) where ac = 2 and bd = 40 coming from 2 x 2 ± 24 x ± 40
May be scored if they have divided by x but not from e.g. 2 x 3 − 24 x 2 + 40 x → ( 2 x − 4 )( x − 10 )
without clear indication that they have divided by or taken out a factor of x or 2x.
There may be incorrect intermediate steps such as ( 2 x − 20 )( 2 x − 4 ) which do not score the
mark on their own but may be ignored if they return to e.g. ( 2 x − 20 )( x − 2 ) .
A1: 2 x ( x − 2 )( x − 10 ) or e.g. 2 ( x − 10 )( x − 2 ) x . Do not accept e.g. x ( 2 x − 4 )( x − 10 ) . Ignore = 0
ISW after a fully correct factorisation e.g. 2 x ( x − 2 )( x − 10 ) that becomes x ( x − 2 )( x − 10 )
and ignore any attempt to find roots (before or after factorisation). Allow ( 2 x )( x − 2 )( x − 10 )
Alternative:
B1: Takes a factor of ( x − 2 ) or ( x − 10 ) out correctly i.e. ( x − 2 ) 2 x 2 − 20 x or( )
( x − 10 ) ( 2 x 2 − 4 x ) . Must be seen as a product of factors and not just in a division attempt but
may be implied by later work.
M1: Attempts to factorise their quadratic. Invisible brackets may be implied by later work.
Score for ax ( bx ± c ) where ab = "2" and ac = their "20" or "4" coming from Ax 2 + Bx
A1: As main scheme.
Note: Solutions that solve the cubic = 0 to achieve x = 0, 2 and 10 and then arrive at e.g.
x ( x − 2 )( x − 10 ) score no marks without a prior line of working such as x x 2 − 12 x + 20 ( )
( )
(would score M1) or x 2 x 2 − 24 x + 40 (would score B1).
Some examples:
• 2 x 3 − 24 x 2 + 40 x → x ( x − 2 )( x − 10 ) scores B0M0A0
• 2 x 3 − 24 x 2 + 40 x → ( 2 x − 4 )( x − 10 ) scores B0M0A0
• x 2 − 12 x + 20 → ( x + 2 )( x − 10 ) scores B0M1A0
• x 3 − 12 x 2 + 20 x → x ( x − 2 )( x − 10 ) scores B0M1A0
• ( )
x 2 x 2 − 24 x + 40 → x ( x − 2 )( x − 10 ) scores B1M0A0
• x ( 2x 2
− 24 x + 40 ) → { x ( 2 x + 2 )( 2 x + 40 ) →} x ( 2 x + 2 )( x + 20 ) scores B1M1A0
• 2x ( x 2
− 12 x + 20 ) → 2 x ( x − 1)( x + 20 ) scores B1M1A0
• 2 x ( x − 2 )( x − 10 ) on its own scores B1M1A1

,Question Scheme Marks AOs

2 1 3
M1 1.1a
x 4 → … x5 or x 2 → … x 2 or −3 → … x
1 5 6 32
Any of x or − x or −3x
5 3 A1 1.1b
 
2
1 5 6 32
Any two of x or − x or −3x
5 3 A1 1.1b
 
2
3
1 5
x − 4 x 2 − 3x + c A1 1.1b
5
(4)
(4 marks)
Notes
M1: For increasing any power by one. Score for x n → x n +1 in any term, including, −3 → … x
where … is a constant, but not for + c. Allow the indices to be unprocessed, e.g., x 4+1
A1: One correct term which may be unsimplified and indices may be unprocessed.
1
6 +1
Condone e.g. −3x1 or − x 2 for this mark. Not scored for + c
1 
 + 1
2 
A1: Two correct terms which may be unsimplified but indices must be processed.
Condone −3x1 for this mark. Not scored for + c
A1: cao Requires all terms simplified and + c
Ignore the LHS i.e. ignore what they call their integral.
3
1 3
Allow 0.2x5 for x5 and −4 x3 or −4 x or −4x x or −4x1.5 for −4x 2
5
Do not allow −3x1 for this mark.
3
1 5
Condone spurious integral signs e.g. ⌠  x − 4 x 2
− 3 x + c or dx left in their answer
⌡5
ISW after a correct expression seen e.g. if they multiply through by 5 or e.g. try to solve = 0
3
1 5
Do not allow e.g. x + −4 x 2 + −3 x + c
5

, ALEVELPAPERZ2025

Question Scheme Marks AOs

3 3x =→
7y y log 7
x log 3 = M1 3.1a
 x  log 7
e.g.  =  A1 1.1b
 y  log 3
(2)
(2 marks)
Notes
x
Note: Condone absence of reference to the value of being undefined when x= y= 0
y

M1: For the key step in attempting to take logarithms with the same base of both sides and
apply the power law to both sides, e.g., x = y log 3 7 or y = x log 7 3 or x ln 3 = y ln 7
Condone e.g. x = log 3 7 y but not x = log 3 ( 7 y )
Alternatively, takes a root of both sides (either x or y), takes logs with the same base of both
x
x y x
sides and applies the power law e.g., 3 =7 → 3 =7 → y
log 3 =log 7
y
May be implied by a correct answer.
 x  log 7 ln 7 1 ln 7
A1:  = or equivalent, e.g, or log 3 7 or Condone e.g.
 y  log 3 ln 3 log 7 3 ln 3

Correct answer only scores both marks provided there is no incorrect log work.
log k 7
Any base k may be used for e.g. provided it is the same base in both logs, although
log k 3
1
 log 3 7  2 log 3 k
watch out for e.g.   or for constant k > 0 which are exceptions and correct.
 log 7 3  log 7 k
x
There is no need to see = but it should be clear what their answer is.
y
log 7 7
Do not ISW if they incorrectly apply log laws e.g. = log =or log 7 − log 3
log 3 3
or log ( 7 − 3) all of which score M1A0.
=
You may ISW after a correct answer if they go on to provide a decimal approximation.
A decimal approximation with no correct log work seen (1.7712…) scores no marks.
$11.78
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
ALevelPaperzz2025 University College London
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
155
Member since
11 months
Number of followers
2
Documents
31
Last sold
1 month ago
ALevelPaperzz2024

4.4

27 reviews

5
18
4
6
3
1
2
1
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions