100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

CRW2602 EXAM PACK 2025

Rating
3.0
(1)
Sold
4
Pages
196
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
26-08-2025
Written in
2025/2026

CRW2602 EXAM PACK 2025

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
August 26, 2025
Number of pages
196
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

CRW2602
EXAM
PACK


2025

, lOMoARcPSD|19139637




How to answer CRW2602 problem-type questions

The purpose of asking problem-type questions in this module is to test your
understanding of the various specific crimes. This requires knowledge and
understanding of the definitions of these crimes.

The second step in answering a problem-type question is to discuss the legal
principles that are relevant to providing the answer to the problem. Most of the legal
principles discussed in this module come from court decisions (case law). You must
therefore make reference to a decided case(s) whenever a legal principle is stated.
You are reminded that even if you fail to remember the name of a case, you can simply
state: “It has been decided” or “According to a decision” when stating the principle.
Please note, however, that the discussion of an incorrect principle will not be credited,
irrespective of whether the case reference (name) is appropriate. In other words,
referring to the correct case name will not award you a mark if it is done to support an
inappropriate legal principle. Students who do this merely indicate to the lecturer that
they do not understand what the cited case actually decided.

The third step in answering a problem-type question is to apply the relevant legal
principles to the facts of the problem. Students often combine the second and third
steps when answering problem-type questions. In other words, they would discuss the
principle(s) while applying it to the facts. There is nothing inappropriate about doing
this. However, the chances of omitting a relevant principle (if there is more than one)
are greater when adopting this approach. To minimise this possibility we would advise
the separation of the second from the third step.

Another advantage of discussing the legal principle(s) before applying them to the
facts is that you can more easily identify the relevant facts at the stage of discussing
the principle(s). This will enable you to address as many relevant facts as possible
and prepare you for a more in-depth analysis at the stage of application.

The final step in answering a problem-type question is to provide a conclusion to the
problem. Please ensure that you have addressed the question(s) that has (have) been
asked. If, for example, the question requires you to determine the criminal liability of X
on a charge of murder, then your conclusion should state either “X is criminally liable
of murder”, or “X is not criminally liable on a charge of murder”. If the question requires
you to determine whether X caused Y’s death, then your conclusion should state either
“X caused Y’s death”, or “X did not cause Y’s death”, et cetera. Please note also that
in order for your conclusion to have any basis it must be a deduction of your reasoning.




Open Rubric
Downloaded by Jonah Njuguna ()

, lOMoARcPSD|19139637




CRW2602 assignments 2024


Criminal Law: Specific Crimes (University of South Africa)




Scan to open on Studocu




Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university
Downloaded by Jonah Njuguna ()

, lOMoARcPSD|19139637




Downloaded by Jonah Njuguna ()

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
1 month ago

3.0

1 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
FocusZone University of South Africa (Unisa)
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
383
Member since
7 months
Number of followers
2
Documents
506
Last sold
3 weeks ago
Focus Zone

On this page you will find Uploads and Package Deals by the seller FOCUS ZONE.

4.3

57 reviews

5
33
4
11
3
11
2
0
1
2

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions