RCE2601 Assignment 4
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
2025 - DUE 4 September 2025
For assistance contact
Email:
, A. A conceptual framework and a theoretical framework are both models used to structure a
study, but they differ in their scope and origin. A conceptual framework is a researcher's
unique model that illustrates the main concepts of a study and their interrelationships. It's
often derived from the researcher's own experiences and a synthesis of different theories. In
contrast, a theoretical framework is built upon an existing, established theory or set of
theories from a particular field of study. It provides a formal, proven structure to explain the
relationships between variables.
For this study, a conceptual framework would be more appropriate. A theoretical framework
might be too restrictive, as the study likely requires a unique model to explore the specific
issues and interventions in an educational context, rather than being confined to a single pre-
existing theory.
B. To conduct a literature review, I would follow these five steps using academic databases
like JSTOR, Scopus, and Google Scholar:
1. Identify Keywords and Search Terms: I'd start by brainstorming keywords related
to the study's central themes, such as "classroom management strategies," "student
engagement," "teacher professional development," and "action research in education."
I'd use Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) to refine my searches.
2. Search for Relevant Literature: I'd then systematically search the chosen databases
using my refined keywords. I'd filter my searches by publication date (e.g., last 5-10
years) to ensure the literature is current and relevant.
3. Review and Synthesize Sources: After gathering a pool of sources, I'd critically read
and evaluate them. I'd pay attention to the methodologies used, key findings, and gaps
in the research. I'd create a synthesis to identify recurring themes, conflicting results,
and areas needing further investigation.
4. Create a Literature Map: I would visually map the relationships between the key
concepts and authors. This helps in identifying the main arguments and how they
connect to the proposed study.
5. Write the Literature Review: I'd finally structure the review thematically, beginning
with broader concepts and narrowing down to the specific focus of the study. This
section would critically analyze and synthesize the literature to justify the research
gap and the study's purpose.
Research Paradigms
A. The positivist, interpretivist, and critical paradigms offer different ways of understanding
the world, and they differ significantly in their ontology, epistemology, and methodology.
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
2025 - DUE 4 September 2025
For assistance contact
Email:
, A. A conceptual framework and a theoretical framework are both models used to structure a
study, but they differ in their scope and origin. A conceptual framework is a researcher's
unique model that illustrates the main concepts of a study and their interrelationships. It's
often derived from the researcher's own experiences and a synthesis of different theories. In
contrast, a theoretical framework is built upon an existing, established theory or set of
theories from a particular field of study. It provides a formal, proven structure to explain the
relationships between variables.
For this study, a conceptual framework would be more appropriate. A theoretical framework
might be too restrictive, as the study likely requires a unique model to explore the specific
issues and interventions in an educational context, rather than being confined to a single pre-
existing theory.
B. To conduct a literature review, I would follow these five steps using academic databases
like JSTOR, Scopus, and Google Scholar:
1. Identify Keywords and Search Terms: I'd start by brainstorming keywords related
to the study's central themes, such as "classroom management strategies," "student
engagement," "teacher professional development," and "action research in education."
I'd use Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) to refine my searches.
2. Search for Relevant Literature: I'd then systematically search the chosen databases
using my refined keywords. I'd filter my searches by publication date (e.g., last 5-10
years) to ensure the literature is current and relevant.
3. Review and Synthesize Sources: After gathering a pool of sources, I'd critically read
and evaluate them. I'd pay attention to the methodologies used, key findings, and gaps
in the research. I'd create a synthesis to identify recurring themes, conflicting results,
and areas needing further investigation.
4. Create a Literature Map: I would visually map the relationships between the key
concepts and authors. This helps in identifying the main arguments and how they
connect to the proposed study.
5. Write the Literature Review: I'd finally structure the review thematically, beginning
with broader concepts and narrowing down to the specific focus of the study. This
section would critically analyze and synthesize the literature to justify the research
gap and the study's purpose.
Research Paradigms
A. The positivist, interpretivist, and critical paradigms offer different ways of understanding
the world, and they differ significantly in their ontology, epistemology, and methodology.
