100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Civil Procedure – Final Exam Study Outline (U.S. Federal & State Jurisdiction, Venue, and Procedural Rules) – Comprehensive Exam Preparation Notes

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
27
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
11-08-2025
Written in
2025/2026

This document provides a complete and detailed outline of key Civil Procedure topics, focusing on U.S. federal and state jurisdiction, venue, and related procedural rules. It covers subject-matter jurisdiction (diversity, federal question, supplemental jurisdiction), personal jurisdiction (long-arm statutes, due process, minimum contacts), and venue rules for diversity and non-diversity cases. The notes also address removal and remand, forum non conveniens, service of process requirements, and federal vs. state law application (Erie doctrine). Designed for law students, this material aligns closely with final exam preparation, offering definitions, rule statements, exceptions, and practical examples.

Show more Read less
Institution
Civil Procedure
Course
Civil procedure










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Civil procedure
Course
Civil procedure

Document information

Uploaded on
August 11, 2025
Number of pages
27
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Content preview

Subject-Matter Jurisdiction ~Correct Answer~✓✓Decides "Federal
Forum" v. "State Forum"



- Diversity Citizenship

- Federal Question (you have the option of federal)



Diversity Jurisdiction Requirements ~Correct Answer~✓✓1. Amount in
Controversy: P's Claim more then $75,000. Claim must be made in
"good faith"



2. Complete Diversity: "Across the V", no plaintiff can reside int he
same state as any defendant.



When does Diversity Jurisdiction apply? ~Correct Answer~✓✓When a
plaintiff sues a defendant in federal court, and there is no federal
claims/cause of action. If there is no federal law in the case, the only
way they can be in the federal law is through DIVERSITY. (Amount in
Controversy/Complete Diversity)



Federal Question Jurisdiction ~Correct Answer~✓✓If there is any FQJ
it can be heard in federal court, but it still doesn't have to be. Even if

,there is diversity it can still be heard in state court, FQJ just gives you
the option to go to federal.



Well-Pleaded Complaint Rule ~Correct Answer~✓✓In determining
whether there is federal question, we look at the plaintiffs complaint,
nothing else. Even if plaintiff has federal defense or counter claim, what
determines FQJ is determined by the plaintiffs cause of action.



- Cause of action CANNOT be a state law action w/ anticipation of a
defense of a federal action/law.



-DOESNT matter if there is a "federal ingredient", if cause of action is
based on STATE LAW, there is NO FQJ.



Holmes "Creation" Test (determining FQJ) ~Correct
Answer~✓✓Similar to/Goes hand and hand with WPCR. When looking
at plaintiffs complain, what law provides plaintiff with a remedy? State
law or Federal law? If YES, FQJ exists



Private Right of Action ~Correct Answer~✓✓When congress says you
have a right to enforce a particular statute.



Supplemental Jurisdiction ~Correct Answer~✓✓Can ONLY be applied
to:

, 1) Original Jurisdiction, AND

2) Federal Question Jurisdiction



Supplemental Jurisdiction on "Pendent Parties" in a diversity claim?
~Correct Answer~✓✓NO!



EXCEPTION: Multiple P's suing 1 D, only 1 Plaintiff per defendant has
to satisfy the amount in controversy, pending there is CNOF.
COMPLETE DIVERSITY also required when talking about claims filed
by the Plaintiff.



Pendent claims/parties ~Correct Answer~✓✓Additional parties sued by
PLAINTIFF in her complaint.

• 1 federal claim/others are state law claims

• Doesn't work in diversity cases, only federal

• MUST satisfy common nucleus of facts



Ancillary claims/parties ~Correct Answer~✓✓Additional parties sued
by defendant, after plaintiff files her complaint usually by:

• counterclaim (suing back),

• cross-claim (suing other defendant), OR

• third party complaint (if I'm liable to you its because X did this wrong
too)

• MUST satisfy common nucleus of facts (if you want it to be covered
under supplemental jurisdiction

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
PUREGRADES University Of Washington
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
94
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
5
Documents
1140
Last sold
4 days ago
PUREGRADES

I am an experienced academic writer , with ability to do high quality assignments, essays, research papers, and discussion. Whether you\'re looking for detailed answers to complex questions or need a comprehensive and well structured paper, I am here to assist, hence ensuring tailored and reliable solutions for your academic needs. Let’s achieve your academic goals together.

4.4

17 reviews

5
11
4
2
3
4
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions