RRLLB81
Assignment 1 QUIZ Semester 2 2025
Unique Number:
Due Date: August 2025
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
,8/7/25, 11:29 PM Assessment 1: Attempt review
RRLLB81-25-S2 > Welcome Message > Assessment 1
QUIZ
Startedon Thursday, 7 August 2025, 10:43 PM
State Finished
Completedon Thursday, 7 August 2025, 11:28 PM
Time taken 44 mins 54 secs
Feedback This is a multiple-choice assessment. It consists of 20 questions worth 5
marks each. Most of the questions in this assessment deal with the
contents of Tutorial Letter 102.
Question 1
Incorrect
Marked out of 5.00
Which one of these options (lists of cases) complies with the requirements for the
bibliographical listing of case law?
a. Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA) para 12
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC) 84
Comair Ltd v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ) 91
S v Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC) para 120
b. Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC)
Comair Ltd v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ)
S v Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC)
Comair Ltd v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ)
S v Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA)
Comair Ltd v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ)
Sv Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC)
e. Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC)
Comair Lid v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ)
Sv Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC)
https://mymodules.dtls.unisa.ac.za/mod/quiz/review. php? attempt=28582582&cmid=1257775 1/10
,8/7/25, 11:29 PM Assessment 1: Attempt review
Question 2
Correct
Marked out of 5.00
You want to cite p 205 of the following book in a footnote in your research paper:
Bibliographic information
Title Neethling on Personality Rights
Authors J. Neethling, J. M. Potgieter, Anneliese Roos
* Publisher LexisNexis Butterworths, 2019
ISBN 0409121924, 9780409121926
Length 490 pages
Directly below is a picture of the title page of the book.
Neethling
on
Personality Rights
J NEETHLING
BA LLB (UOVS) LLM (McGill) LLD (Unisa)
Emeritus Professor of Private Law, University of South Africa
Research Fellow of Private Law. University of the Free State
Advocate of the Supreme Court of South Africa
JM POTGIETER
Blur LLM (RAU) LLM (Harvard) LLD (Unisa)
Professor Extraordinanius of Private Law, University of Sowth Africa
Attorney, Notary and Conveyancer
A ROOS
BA LLB (UP) LLD (Unisa)
Professorof Private Law, Unwersity of South Africa
Advocate of the Supreme Court of South Africa
a. Neethling J, Potgieter JM and Roos Anneliese, Neethling on Personality
Rights (LexisNexis 2019) p 205.
b. J Neethling, JM Potgieter and A Roos, Neethling on Personality Rights (LexisNexis,
2019) 205.
https://mymodules.dtls.unisa.ac.za/mod/quiz/review.
php? attempt=28582582&cmid=1257775 2/10
, 8/7/25, 11:29 PM Assessment 1: Attempt review
c. J. Neethling, J.M. Potgieter and A. Roos, Neethling on Personality Rights (LexisNexis
2019) 205.
d. JNeethling, JM Potgieter & A Roos, Neethling on Personality Rights (LexisNexis
2019) 205
e. JNeethling, JM Potgieter and A Roos, Neethling on Personality Vv
Rights (LexisNexis 2019) 205.
Question 3
Correct
Marked out of 5.00
Where should a footnote not be inserted in the main text? Choose one or more from the
answers below
a. Atthe very beginning of the quoted sentence, that is, before the quoted text. v
b. After a full stop, where the quotes ends.
c. Anywhere the author deems appropriate, it is matter of choice. ¥
d. After the name of the quoted author at the beginning of a sentence. v
e. After a coma, where the quotes ends.
Question 4
Correct
Marked out of 5.00
The main text of your research should be formatted in the following manner:
a. Must be typed in Arial font, size 12; must be centred.
b. Must be typed in Arial font, size 12; must be justified. v
c. Must be typed in Arial font, size 10; must be justified.
d. Must be typed in Arial font, size 11; must be justified.
e. Must be typed in New Roman Times font, size 12; must be justified.
https://mymodules.dtls.unisa.ac.za/mod/quiz/review. php? attempt=28582582&cmid=1257775 3/10
Assignment 1 QUIZ Semester 2 2025
Unique Number:
Due Date: August 2025
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
,8/7/25, 11:29 PM Assessment 1: Attempt review
RRLLB81-25-S2 > Welcome Message > Assessment 1
QUIZ
Startedon Thursday, 7 August 2025, 10:43 PM
State Finished
Completedon Thursday, 7 August 2025, 11:28 PM
Time taken 44 mins 54 secs
Feedback This is a multiple-choice assessment. It consists of 20 questions worth 5
marks each. Most of the questions in this assessment deal with the
contents of Tutorial Letter 102.
Question 1
Incorrect
Marked out of 5.00
Which one of these options (lists of cases) complies with the requirements for the
bibliographical listing of case law?
a. Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA) para 12
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC) 84
Comair Ltd v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ) 91
S v Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC) para 120
b. Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC)
Comair Ltd v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ)
S v Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC)
Comair Ltd v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ)
S v Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA)
Comair Ltd v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ)
Sv Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC)
e. Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC)
Comair Lid v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ)
Sv Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC)
https://mymodules.dtls.unisa.ac.za/mod/quiz/review. php? attempt=28582582&cmid=1257775 1/10
,8/7/25, 11:29 PM Assessment 1: Attempt review
Question 2
Correct
Marked out of 5.00
You want to cite p 205 of the following book in a footnote in your research paper:
Bibliographic information
Title Neethling on Personality Rights
Authors J. Neethling, J. M. Potgieter, Anneliese Roos
* Publisher LexisNexis Butterworths, 2019
ISBN 0409121924, 9780409121926
Length 490 pages
Directly below is a picture of the title page of the book.
Neethling
on
Personality Rights
J NEETHLING
BA LLB (UOVS) LLM (McGill) LLD (Unisa)
Emeritus Professor of Private Law, University of South Africa
Research Fellow of Private Law. University of the Free State
Advocate of the Supreme Court of South Africa
JM POTGIETER
Blur LLM (RAU) LLM (Harvard) LLD (Unisa)
Professor Extraordinanius of Private Law, University of Sowth Africa
Attorney, Notary and Conveyancer
A ROOS
BA LLB (UP) LLD (Unisa)
Professorof Private Law, Unwersity of South Africa
Advocate of the Supreme Court of South Africa
a. Neethling J, Potgieter JM and Roos Anneliese, Neethling on Personality
Rights (LexisNexis 2019) p 205.
b. J Neethling, JM Potgieter and A Roos, Neethling on Personality Rights (LexisNexis,
2019) 205.
https://mymodules.dtls.unisa.ac.za/mod/quiz/review.
php? attempt=28582582&cmid=1257775 2/10
, 8/7/25, 11:29 PM Assessment 1: Attempt review
c. J. Neethling, J.M. Potgieter and A. Roos, Neethling on Personality Rights (LexisNexis
2019) 205.
d. JNeethling, JM Potgieter & A Roos, Neethling on Personality Rights (LexisNexis
2019) 205
e. JNeethling, JM Potgieter and A Roos, Neethling on Personality Vv
Rights (LexisNexis 2019) 205.
Question 3
Correct
Marked out of 5.00
Where should a footnote not be inserted in the main text? Choose one or more from the
answers below
a. Atthe very beginning of the quoted sentence, that is, before the quoted text. v
b. After a full stop, where the quotes ends.
c. Anywhere the author deems appropriate, it is matter of choice. ¥
d. After the name of the quoted author at the beginning of a sentence. v
e. After a coma, where the quotes ends.
Question 4
Correct
Marked out of 5.00
The main text of your research should be formatted in the following manner:
a. Must be typed in Arial font, size 12; must be centred.
b. Must be typed in Arial font, size 12; must be justified. v
c. Must be typed in Arial font, size 10; must be justified.
d. Must be typed in Arial font, size 11; must be justified.
e. Must be typed in New Roman Times font, size 12; must be justified.
https://mymodules.dtls.unisa.ac.za/mod/quiz/review. php? attempt=28582582&cmid=1257775 3/10
