100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

IRM1501 Assignment 2 | COMPLETE ANSWERS | Semester 2 2025 (860058) - DUE 15 September 2025

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
11
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
27-07-2025
Written in
2024/2025

IRM1501 Assignment 2 | COMPLETE ANSWERS | Semester 2 2025 (860058) - DUE 15 September 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.

Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
July 27, 2025
Number of pages
11
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

, IRM1501 Assignment 2
Semester 2 2025 (860058)
DUE 15 September 2025
Use this document as a guide and for references to answer your assignment


2 answers provided
Global & Local Investments Advisors (Pty) Ltd v Fouché (71/2019)
[2020] ZASCA 8 (18 March 2020)

1. Facts

 In November 2015, Mr Nickolaus Ludick Fouché (―the Respondent‖) engaged
Global & Local Investments Advisors (Pty) Ltd (―Global & Local‖ or ―the
Appellant‖), a financial services provider, to invest and manage funds on his
behalf.
 The written mandate stipulated that all instructions had to be sent by fax to a
specified number or by email to a specified address, with the client’s signature
attached.
 Global opened and managed a Corporate Cash Manager (CCM) account at Investec
Bank in Fouché’s name.
 In August 2016, fraudsters hacked Fouché’s Gmail account and sent three emails
on 15, 18 and 24 August, purportedly from him, instructing Global to transfer sums
totaling R804,000 to third-party bank accounts. Each email ended with ―Regards,
Nick‖ or ―Thanks, Nick‖ and had no attachments.
 Global complied and transferred R100,000, R375,000, and R329,000 respectively.
Fouché later notified them that he had not sent those emails and demanded
reimbursement.
 The High Court (Gauteng Division, Vorster AJ) found that Global had breached
the mandate by transferring funds without a valid signature and ordered repayment
and costs in favour of Fouché.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
SparkHubIdeas university of south africa (unisa)
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
45
Member since
4 months
Number of followers
0
Documents
201
Last sold
3 weeks ago

4.0

5 reviews

5
2
4
1
3
2
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions