Communication Law Quiz With Correct
Answers
In dthe dfederal dcourt dsystem, dthere dare dCourts dof dAppeals dthat dhear dcases din
dthree-judge dpanels. dMost dof dthe dappellate dcourts dare darranged din dcircuits
dgeographically. dIndiana dis din dwhich dcircuit? d- dCORRECT✅✅Seventh
The dAlien dand dSedition dActs dof d1798 dprovided dan dearly dtest dof dthe dFirst
dAmendment dbecause dthey dmade dit da dcrime dto dcriticize dthe dpresident, dCongress
dor dthe dgovernment. dThe dActs d- dCORRECT✅✅led dto dmore dthan da ddozen
dprosecutions
John dPeter dZenger's dmid-1730s dprosecution dfor dseditious dlibel dfor dhis dnewspaper's
dcriticisms dof dNew dYork's dcolonial dgovernor dbecame dfamous dand dinspired drebels
dbecause dhis dlawyer dsuccessfully dargued dthat d- dCORRECT✅✅truth dshould dbe da
ddefense dagainst da dlibel dcharge
If da dcourt dof dlaw ddetermines dthat da dregulation dbeing dchallenged dbecause dit
daffects dfreedom dof dspeech dis dcontent- dor dviewpoint-based, dit dwill drequire dthe
dgovernment dto dprove dit dhad da dcompelling dreason dfor denacting dthe dregulation dand
dthat dit dwas dnarrowly dtailored dto daffect das dlittle dspeech das dnecessary. dThis dtype
dof djudicial dreview dis dknown das d- dCORRECT✅✅strict dscrutiny
In dthe dMahanoy dv. dB.L. dcase, dthe dSupreme dCourt dfor dthe dfirst dtime druled don
dwhether dschools dhad dany dpower dto ddiscipline dstudents dfor doff-campus dspeech. dA
dhigh dschool dkicked da dstudent doff dthe djunior-varsity dcheerleading dsquad dfor da
dprofane drant don dSnapChat dafter dshe dfailed dto dmake dthe dvarsity dsquad. dThe
dCourt dsaid d- dCORRECT✅✅the dschool dwent dtoo dfar din dpunishing dB.L. dfor doff-
campus dspeech dthat dwas dnot ddisruptive
In dBrandenburg dv. dOhio din d1969, dinvolving dthe darrest dof da dKKK dmember dfor
dthreatening d"revengeance" dagainst dthe dgovernment dduring da dspeech dto dother
dKlan dmembers, dthe dSupreme dCourt dmade dit dharder dfor dauthorities dto dsuppress dor
dpunish danti-government dspeech dby drequiring da dshowing dof d-
dCORRECT✅✅incitement dto dan dimminent dbreach dof dthe dpeace
While dfalse dlight dinvasion dof dprivacy dclosely dresembles dlibel, da dkey ddifference dis
dthat dthe dplaintiff ddoes dnot dhave dto dprove ddefamation, dbut ddoes dhave dto dprove
dthat dthe dpublication dwas d- dCORRECT✅✅highly doffensive dto da dreasonable
dperson
Answers
In dthe dfederal dcourt dsystem, dthere dare dCourts dof dAppeals dthat dhear dcases din
dthree-judge dpanels. dMost dof dthe dappellate dcourts dare darranged din dcircuits
dgeographically. dIndiana dis din dwhich dcircuit? d- dCORRECT✅✅Seventh
The dAlien dand dSedition dActs dof d1798 dprovided dan dearly dtest dof dthe dFirst
dAmendment dbecause dthey dmade dit da dcrime dto dcriticize dthe dpresident, dCongress
dor dthe dgovernment. dThe dActs d- dCORRECT✅✅led dto dmore dthan da ddozen
dprosecutions
John dPeter dZenger's dmid-1730s dprosecution dfor dseditious dlibel dfor dhis dnewspaper's
dcriticisms dof dNew dYork's dcolonial dgovernor dbecame dfamous dand dinspired drebels
dbecause dhis dlawyer dsuccessfully dargued dthat d- dCORRECT✅✅truth dshould dbe da
ddefense dagainst da dlibel dcharge
If da dcourt dof dlaw ddetermines dthat da dregulation dbeing dchallenged dbecause dit
daffects dfreedom dof dspeech dis dcontent- dor dviewpoint-based, dit dwill drequire dthe
dgovernment dto dprove dit dhad da dcompelling dreason dfor denacting dthe dregulation dand
dthat dit dwas dnarrowly dtailored dto daffect das dlittle dspeech das dnecessary. dThis dtype
dof djudicial dreview dis dknown das d- dCORRECT✅✅strict dscrutiny
In dthe dMahanoy dv. dB.L. dcase, dthe dSupreme dCourt dfor dthe dfirst dtime druled don
dwhether dschools dhad dany dpower dto ddiscipline dstudents dfor doff-campus dspeech. dA
dhigh dschool dkicked da dstudent doff dthe djunior-varsity dcheerleading dsquad dfor da
dprofane drant don dSnapChat dafter dshe dfailed dto dmake dthe dvarsity dsquad. dThe
dCourt dsaid d- dCORRECT✅✅the dschool dwent dtoo dfar din dpunishing dB.L. dfor doff-
campus dspeech dthat dwas dnot ddisruptive
In dBrandenburg dv. dOhio din d1969, dinvolving dthe darrest dof da dKKK dmember dfor
dthreatening d"revengeance" dagainst dthe dgovernment dduring da dspeech dto dother
dKlan dmembers, dthe dSupreme dCourt dmade dit dharder dfor dauthorities dto dsuppress dor
dpunish danti-government dspeech dby drequiring da dshowing dof d-
dCORRECT✅✅incitement dto dan dimminent dbreach dof dthe dpeace
While dfalse dlight dinvasion dof dprivacy dclosely dresembles dlibel, da dkey ddifference dis
dthat dthe dplaintiff ddoes dnot dhave dto dprove ddefamation, dbut ddoes dhave dto dprove
dthat dthe dpublication dwas d- dCORRECT✅✅highly doffensive dto da dreasonable
dperson
