100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

HRPYC81 Project 3 Assignment 3 (RESEARCH PROPOSAL ANSWERS) 2025

Rating
4.0
(4)
Sold
11
Pages
17
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
03-07-2025
Written in
2024/2025

HRPYC81 Project 3 Assignment 3 (RESEARCH PROPOSAL ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.6.7-1.7.1-1.7.3.9. Ensure your success with us. .. Gender Stereotypes and their implications for intergender relations

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
July 3, 2025
Number of pages
17
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

HRPYC81
Project 3 Assignment 3 2025
RESEARCH PROPOSAL

Unique number:

Due Date: 2025
RESEARCH PROPOSAL

EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF GENDER STEREOTYPES ON SUPPORT FOR
GENDER EQUALITY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ENTITLEMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA

1. INTRODUCTION

Gender stereotypes remain a powerful force shaping individual attitudes, social norms,
and institutional practices across societies. Despite progress in legal and policy
frameworks promoting gender equality, persistent beliefs about the roles, traits, and
behaviours appropriate for men and women continue to influence how people relate to
one another and how they position themselves within social structures. In the South
African context, where the legacies of patriarchy, colonisation, and systemic inequality
continue to intersect, gender stereotypes play a central role in reinforcing unequal power
dynamics and limiting social transformation. These stereotypes, often rooted in
communal-agentic and warmth-competence dimensions, not only influence how
Terms of use
individuals view others but also how they view themselves, especially in relation to group
By making use of this document you agree to:
identity  Use this document
and entitlement. Psychological as a guide
constructs for learning,
such comparison
as support and reference
for gender purpose,
equality
Terms of use
 Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
 document
 Use this Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, or and
reference, misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
 Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
 Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.

, +27 67 171 1739



RESEARCH PROPOSAL

EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF GENDER STEREOTYPES ON SUPPORT FOR
GENDER EQUALITY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ENTITLEMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA

1. INTRODUCTION

Gender stereotypes remain a powerful force shaping individual attitudes, social
norms, and institutional practices across societies. Despite progress in legal and
policy frameworks promoting gender equality, persistent beliefs about the roles,
traits, and behaviours appropriate for men and women continue to influence how
people relate to one another and how they position themselves within social
structures. In the South African context—where the legacies of patriarchy,
colonisation, and systemic inequality continue to intersect—gender stereotypes play
a central role in reinforcing unequal power dynamics and limiting social
transformation. These stereotypes, often rooted in communal-agentic and warmth-
competence dimensions, not only influence how individuals view others but also how
they view themselves, especially in relation to group identity and entitlement.
Psychological constructs such as support for gender equality and psychological
entitlement are often shaped by the extent to which individuals internalise or reject
these gendered perceptions.

This research project seeks to explore how gender stereotypes—particularly auto-,
hetero-, and meta-stereotypes—relate to these two outcome variables. Using a
cross-sectional survey design, the study will assess how men and women perceive
their own and each other’s gender groups and how these perceptions may be linked
to either endorsing equality or justifying group-based advantages.



2. LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Introduction

Gender stereotypes continue to shape attitudes, roles, and expectations across all
areas of society despite legal and policy efforts aimed at promoting equality. The
persistence of beliefs that women are inherently communal and nurturing, and men
are agentic and dominant, affects how individuals engage in social life and perceive
their own roles (Haines, Deaux, & Lofaro, 2016; Ellemers, 2018). These gendered
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is"
without any express or implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or
liability for any actions taken based on the information contained within this document. This document is
intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes. Reproduction, resale, or transmission
of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
$3.23
Get access to the full document:
Purchased by 11 students

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 4 reviews
6 months ago

It’s AI generated

6 months ago

6 months ago

7 months ago

4.0

4 reviews

5
3
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
1
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
EduPal University of South Africa (Unisa)
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
149536
Member since
7 year
Number of followers
35999
Documents
4459
Last sold
1 hour ago

4.2

13644 reviews

5
7863
4
2703
3
1801
2
457
1
820

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions