RCE2601 Assignment 2 2025 (Answer Guide) - Due 13 June 2025

RCE2601 Assignment 2 2025 (Answer Guide) - Due 13 June 2025 Task 1: Source Evaluation 1. Prioritized Sources (A) Peer-Reviewed Journal Article Why it should be prioritized: • Gold standard in academic research – Peer review ensures methodological rigor, validity, and contribution to knowledge. • Credible authorship – Typically written by PhD researchers or professors with domain expertise. • Structured argumentation – Follows academic conventions (e.g., literature review, methodology, findings, discussion). • Citations & references – Allows Sarah to trace key theories and prior research. Example of strong use in literature review: • If Sarah finds a Computers & Education study on AI chatbots improving student engagement, she can: o Compare its findings with other studies. o Critique its methodology (e.g., sample size, bias). o Use it to identify gaps (e.g., "Most studies focus on STEM; humanities need more research"). Potential limitations: • Some journals have paywalls (Sarah should use institutional access). • Publication bias – Negative or inconclusive results may be underreported. (B) Government Report Why it should be prioritized: • Policy relevance – Governments shape AI adoption in education (e.g., funding, regulations). • Data-driven insights – Often includes surveys, case studies, or expert panels. • Long-term perspective – Unlike blogs, reports analyze trends over years. Example of strong use in literature review: • A UNESCO report on AI ethics in education could help Sarah discuss: o Global disparities in AI access.