100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Forensic Psychology – Exam 1 Q&A with Verified Answers | Expert Testimony, Legal Standards, and RNR Model

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
16
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
31-05-2025
Written in
2024/2025

This document is a comprehensive set of verified questions and answers for Exam 1 in forensic psychology, with a strong focus on expert testimony, admissibility standards (Frye, Daubert, Kumho), the Risk-Needs-Responsivity (RNR) model, and psychological assessment techniques. It covers distinctions between therapeutic and forensic assessment, types of interviews, syndrome evidence, bias in expert witness testimony, and landmark legal cases such as Jenkins v. United States and Atkins v. Virginia. Perfect for university students preparing for exams in legal and clinical psychology intersections.

Show more Read less
Institution
Forensic Psychology
Course
Forensic Psychology










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Forensic Psychology
Course
Forensic Psychology

Document information

Uploaded on
May 31, 2025
Number of pages
16
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

Forensic Psych Exam 1 questions with verified
answers
According to the survey presented in class, what percentage of
psychologists /psychiatrists had generated a criminal profile?
a. Is this likely to over-estimate or under-estimate the actual
percentage of psychologists who have generated a criminal profile?
Why? Ans✓✓✓ 10.9%


Based on the General Electric v Joiner, who functions as the gatekeeper
of expert testimony? Ans✓✓✓ Trial judge


Define Risks, Needs, and Responsivity Ans✓✓✓ Risks: Maximum
treatment for those offenders who are at greatest risk for re-offending


(Criminogenic) Needs: criminogenic needs, which involve the reasons
an individual commits a crime
What are some examples of criminogenic needs?


Responsivity: Providing the right treatment at the right level


Define syndrome evidence and identify the problems with this type of
evidence. Ans✓✓✓ Set of symptoms that occur together in a
meaningful way and normally have a triggering event
Generally lack empirical support

,Typically based on clinical experience, not on research
High number of false positives


Describe the criteria for the following standards for admissibility of
expert testimony
a. Frye Standard
b. Federal Rules of Evidence
c. Daubert Standard Ans✓✓✓ Frye v US (1923)
Specific testimony admitted if generally accepted by scientific
community
Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993)
Scientific testimony admitted if relevant and reliable according to 4
potential criteria
General Electric Co vs Joiner (1997)
Trial judge is gatekeeper for admission of scientific evidence
Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. V Carmichael (1999)
Prior rulings on admissibility of scientific testimony apply to technical
and specialized knowledge


Describe the empirically-supported factors that can increase or
decrease expert witness credibility Ans✓✓✓ Experts who testify
frequently
Experts who are not locally-based
Experts who have only testified for defense

, Experts who do not actively practice
Experts who were paid $$$$$


Describe the theoretical factors that can increase or decrease expert
witness credibility Ans✓✓✓ Characteristics that increase credibility:
Dressing professionally
Maintaining good eye contact with the jury
Projecting voice
Demonstrating composure in the adversarial context


Characteristics that decrease credibility:
Excessive amount of time testifying (giving long-winded answers)
Testifying on issues outside of expertise
Lack of knowledge about current case
Inconsistencies
Using improper scientific methods


Do the Frye and Daubert Standards impact the outcomes of cases
differently? Ans✓✓✓ Frye v US (1923)
Specific testimony admitted if generally accepted by scientific
community
Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993)

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
cracker Chamberlain School Of Nursing
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
2022
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
1344
Documents
47129
Last sold
17 hours ago
✨ Cracker – Verified Study Powerhouse

Welcome to your shortcut to academic and certification success. I'm Cracker, a trusted top seller I specialize in high-quality study guides, test banks, certification prep, and real-world exam material all tailored to help you pass fast and score high.

3.8

369 reviews

5
162
4
84
3
52
2
22
1
49

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions