100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Case

D480 ITSW 3151 Software Design & Quality Assurance - Objective Assessment - WGU 2025

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
34
Uploaded on
28-05-2025
Written in
2024/2025

D480 ITSW 3151 Software Design & Quality Assurance - Objective Assessment - WGU 2025D480 ITSW 3151 Software Design & Quality Assurance - Objective Assessment - WGU 2025D480 ITSW 3151 Software Design & Quality Assurance - Objective Assessment - WGU 2025

Show more Read less











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
May 28, 2025
Number of pages
34
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Case
Professor(s)
Unknown
Grade
Unknown

Subjects

Content preview

D480 ITSW 3151 Software Design &
Quality Assurance

Objective Assessment Review

(Questions & Solutions)

2025




©2025

, Question 1
An enterprise system is being redesigned to improve maintainability.
Which SOLID principle specifically advises that a class should have only
one reason to change?
- A. Open/Closed Principle
- B. Single Responsibility Principle
- C. Liskov Substitution Principle
- D. Interface Segregation Principle

ANS: B
Rationale: The Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) states that a class
should have one, and only one, reason to change. This reduces
complexity by ensuring that each class addresses a single functionality or
concern.

---

Question 2
In a scenario where a large-scale distributed system must be designed to
handle independent feature deployments and minimize
interdependencies, which architectural style is most beneficial?
- A. Monolithic architecture
- B. Layered architecture
- C. Microservices architecture
- D. Client–server architecture

ANS: C
Rationale: A microservices architecture decomposes an application into
small, loosely coupled services that can be deployed and scaled
independently. This style is particularly advantageous for accommodating
continuous delivery and reducing the impact of changes.

---
©2025

, Question 3
A team of software engineers must add new behavior to objects at
runtime without altering existing class code. Which design pattern best
addresses this need?
- A. Observer Pattern
- B. Strategy Pattern
- C. Decorator Pattern
- D. Adapter Pattern

ANS: C
Rationale: The Decorator Pattern allows behavior to be added
dynamically by “wrapping” an object with a decorator class. This
preserves the existing code while enabling enhanced functionality at
runtime.

---

Question 4
When automating regression tests for a continuously evolving
application, which technique best ensures that changes do not
reintroduce previously fixed defects?
- A. Smoke testing
- B. Performance testing
- C. Regression testing using automated test suites
- D. Exploratory testing

ANS: C
Rationale: Regression testing—especially when automated—ensures
that code modifications do not break or degrade previously working
functionality, making it crucial for continuous integration and
deployment environments.

---


©2025

, Question 5
In assessing software quality for a safety‑critical system, which quality
assurance approach involves formal, structured reviews with a team of
experts to examine software artifacts?
- A. Ad hoc code reviews
- B. Fagan Inspection
- C. Automated unit testing
- D. Pair programming

ANS: B
Rationale: Fagan Inspection is a structured review process used to
detect defects early by having a formal, team‑based examination of
design documents or code, making it particularly important for
safety‑critical systems.

---

Question 6
Which metric is most relevant when measuring the reliability and quality
of a software product during its testing phase?
- A. Lines of code (LOC)
- B. Defect density
- C. Code churn
- D. Cyclomatic complexity

ANS: B
Rationale: Defect density—defined as the number of defects per unit
size of the software—is a key measure of software reliability and quality,
allowing teams to monitor improvements and risk areas throughout the
development lifecycle.

---

Question 7
A software product's design undergoes multiple iterations, and each
©2025

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
EmilioOchieng Walden University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
138
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
17
Documents
4024
Last sold
6 days ago

Hi there! I'm a former nursing student who loves to share my knowledge and experience with others. I have a collection of past study notes and papers for nursing and other programs that I sell at affordable prices. Whether you need help with anatomy, pharmacology, ethics, or anything else, I have something for you. My notes are clear, concise, and fun to read. They will make your learning easier and more enjoyable. Plus, you'll get to see some of my witty comments and jokes along the way. Trust me, you won't regret buying from me!

Read more Read less
4.0

22 reviews

5
11
4
5
3
3
2
1
1
2

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions