M100 Exam Questions And Answers 100%
Pass
Army Force Generation - ANS -One of three military force operations
-Directs the development of Army capabilities
-Designed to efficiently generate Army Forces
over time
-Provides ready and responsive forces to the
Joint Force Commander
ReARMM- Principles and priorities - ANS Predictability, Stability, and Synchronization
ReARMM - ANS designed to optimize our ability to modernize and train the Total Army to
meet SECDEF directed mission requirements while maintaining our commitment to Soldiers
Allow the Army to prioritize People and Deliberate Modernization
Allows the Force to see two years in detail, three years in concept
A disciplined life cycle approach enables the Army to minimize OPTEMPO and PERSTEMPO
turbulence
ReARMM - primary phases of Unit Life Cycle Model - ANS Modernize
, ©EVERLY 2025 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Train
Mission
Assigned Modernization (AMOD) Level One - ANS Unit equipped with the most recent and
capable variant available
Assigned Modernization (AMOD) Level Two - ANS Unit equipped with the next most recent
and capable variant containing some advanced capabilities to ensure interoperability
Assigned Modernization (AMOD) Level Three - ANS Unit equipped with fully capable
equipment to meet ReARMM mission line requirements containing some advanced capabilities
to ensure interoperability.
ReARMM - Unit Life Cycles - ANS 8 month cycles
ReARMM requirement - ANS organizational leaders need to have have a deep understanding
of the importance of four measured areas of the
Commander's Unit Status Report (CUSR)
‒ Personnel (P-Rating)
‒ Equipment on Hand (S-Rating)
‒ Equipment Readiness (R-Rating)
‒ Training Readiness (T-Rating)
C-Level Rating (lower is better) - ANS Overall Readiness Assessment
, ©EVERLY 2025 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Personnel (P-Level) - ANS measures personnel readiness using three metrics for personnel fill
percentages that are based on required strength established in the unit's formal requirements
and authorizations document (MTOE or TDA)
‒ Available Personnel Strength
‒ Available MOS Strength by Duty Position
‒ Available Senior Grade Strength
Equipment on Hand (S-level) - ANS is calculated by separately comparing the approved
authorizations document (MTOE) quantities of mission essential equipment items (ERC-P or
ERC-A) that are in the unit's possession or available within 72 hours.
ot based solely on property accountability records and it does not consider the operational
readiness or serviceability of the items.
Equipment Readiness (R-level) - ANS indicates how well the unit or organization is
maintaining its on-hand equipment
‒ R-level is determined by calculating an aggregate R-level
‒ One R-level considers all maintenance reportable equipment
‒ One R-level considers only pacing items (ERC P) LIN
‒ The overall R-level is determined by comparing the aggregate R-level and the R-levels for
pacing items
‒ The overall R-level is equal to the lowest of these two R-levels.
Training (T-level) - ANS reflects the commander's assessment of unit proficiency in the
METs associated with its core functions/designed capabilities
‒ T-METL percentage is auto-calculated by NetUSR using data obtained from DTMS
‒ T assessed METs are multiplied by 3
‒ P assessed METs are multiplied by 2
‒ U assessed METs are multiplied by 1
, ©EVERLY 2025 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
‒ Total number of Unit METs are multiplied by 3
‒ The T-METL percentage = sum of the assessed METs divided by the sum of Total # METs
multiplied by 100
Training Days (T-Days) - ANS reflect the number of training days the commander estimates is
required for the unit to become fully trained (T1) on its standardized METs
ADCON - ANS Training is___authority of the Army under Title 10
Mission Essential Task (MET) proficiency - ANS ‒ Achieved by the unit's ability to perform
METs to standard
‒ Measured by training proficiency ratings
Weapons Qualification - ANS ‒ Individual/crew-served/special purpose/platform weapon
qualification proficiency is achieved by unit's qualifying on its organic weapons
‒ Measured by "Qualified" or "Not Qualified" against respective weapons training circulars
achieved by the unit executing specified collective tasks while simultaneously employing its
organic weapons systems in a live-fire environment
Collective live-fire task proficiency - ANS ‒ *Group 1: company or larger deployable units that
can independently execute a collective task under live-fire conditions
‒ *Group 2: other deployable units that cannot independently execute a collective task under
live-fire conditions. (e.g. Quartermaster Rigger Support Team, Medical Units)
‒ Proponent developed collective live-fire tasks
‒ Measured by training proficiency ratings and respective weapons training circulars
T Trained (advanced task proficiency) - ANS ‒ Free of significant shortcomings; unit's
shortcomings require minimal training to meet the Army standard