BSW4804
assignmen
Assignment 1 2025
UNIQUE CODE: 793991
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations
DUE DATE: 16 MAY 2025
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning,
comparison and reference purpose,
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the
contents of this document as your own work,
Fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise
or misuse this document.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this
document, however the contents are provided “as
is” without any representations or warranties,
express or implied. The author assumes no
liability as a result of reliance and use of the
contents of this document. This document is to
be used for comparison, research and reference
purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or
by any means.
, 0688120934
PREVIEW
Question 1: Theoretical Framework
a)
Ecological systems theory, developed by Bronfenbrenner (1979), remains a
foundational framework for analysing the complex interplay between a child and their
environment. This theory identifies four interconnected systems—micro, mezzo, exo,
and macro—that directly or indirectly influence a child’s development and well-being.
The micro-system consists of a child’s immediate environment, including family, peers,
and school. This level exerts the most direct influence. A nurturing home with
emotionally supportive caregivers promotes psychological well-being and secure
attachment. Positive peer relationships and an inclusive classroom can also foster
confidence and cognitive development (Donald et al., 2020). In contrast, exposure to
neglect, domestic violence, or erratic caregiving can severely compromise a child’s
emotional regulation and sense of safety (DSD et al., 2022).
The mezzo-system involves the interrelations among micro-systems, such as parent–
teacher relationships or family–community dynamics. Effective communication between
parents and teachers, for example, can reinforce learning and behavioural consistency.
Conversely, fragmented relationships or lack of parental involvement in schooling may
hinder the child’s academic and social progress (Van Breda, 2021).
The exo-system comprises settings the child does not actively participate in but which
still affect their development. These include a parent’s workplace, healthcare systems,
and local welfare services. If a caregiver’s employment provides stable income and
work–life balance, the child may benefit from improved living conditions and attention.
However, factors such as parental job loss or inaccessible clinics can cause stress that
trickles down to the child (Hall & Sambu, 2022).
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is”
without any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as
a result of reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for
comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means.
, 0688120934
Question 1: Theoretical Framework
a)
Ecological systems theory, developed by Bronfenbrenner (1979), remains a
foundational framework for analysing the complex interplay between a child and their
environment. This theory identifies four interconnected systems—micro, mezzo, exo,
and macro—that directly or indirectly influence a child’s development and well-being.
The micro-system consists of a child’s immediate environment, including family, peers,
and school. This level exerts the most direct influence. A nurturing home with
emotionally supportive caregivers promotes psychological well-being and secure
attachment. Positive peer relationships and an inclusive classroom can also foster
confidence and cognitive development (Donald et al., 2020). In contrast, exposure to
neglect, domestic violence, or erratic caregiving can severely compromise a child’s
emotional regulation and sense of safety (DSD et al., 2022).
The mezzo-system involves the interrelations among micro-systems, such as parent–
teacher relationships or family–community dynamics. Effective communication between
parents and teachers, for example, can reinforce learning and behavioural consistency.
Conversely, fragmented relationships or lack of parental involvement in schooling may
hinder the child’s academic and social progress (Van Breda, 2021).
The exo-system comprises settings the child does not actively participate in but which
still affect their development. These include a parent’s workplace, healthcare systems,
and local welfare services. If a caregiver’s employment provides stable income and
work–life balance, the child may benefit from improved living conditions and attention.
However, factors such as parental job loss or inaccessible clinics can cause stress that
trickles down to the child (Hall & Sambu, 2022).
The macro-system refers to broader societal, cultural, and policy environments. In
South Africa, frameworks like the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 and social protection
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is”
without any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as
a result of reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for
comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means.
assignmen
Assignment 1 2025
UNIQUE CODE: 793991
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations
DUE DATE: 16 MAY 2025
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning,
comparison and reference purpose,
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the
contents of this document as your own work,
Fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise
or misuse this document.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this
document, however the contents are provided “as
is” without any representations or warranties,
express or implied. The author assumes no
liability as a result of reliance and use of the
contents of this document. This document is to
be used for comparison, research and reference
purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or
by any means.
, 0688120934
PREVIEW
Question 1: Theoretical Framework
a)
Ecological systems theory, developed by Bronfenbrenner (1979), remains a
foundational framework for analysing the complex interplay between a child and their
environment. This theory identifies four interconnected systems—micro, mezzo, exo,
and macro—that directly or indirectly influence a child’s development and well-being.
The micro-system consists of a child’s immediate environment, including family, peers,
and school. This level exerts the most direct influence. A nurturing home with
emotionally supportive caregivers promotes psychological well-being and secure
attachment. Positive peer relationships and an inclusive classroom can also foster
confidence and cognitive development (Donald et al., 2020). In contrast, exposure to
neglect, domestic violence, or erratic caregiving can severely compromise a child’s
emotional regulation and sense of safety (DSD et al., 2022).
The mezzo-system involves the interrelations among micro-systems, such as parent–
teacher relationships or family–community dynamics. Effective communication between
parents and teachers, for example, can reinforce learning and behavioural consistency.
Conversely, fragmented relationships or lack of parental involvement in schooling may
hinder the child’s academic and social progress (Van Breda, 2021).
The exo-system comprises settings the child does not actively participate in but which
still affect their development. These include a parent’s workplace, healthcare systems,
and local welfare services. If a caregiver’s employment provides stable income and
work–life balance, the child may benefit from improved living conditions and attention.
However, factors such as parental job loss or inaccessible clinics can cause stress that
trickles down to the child (Hall & Sambu, 2022).
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is”
without any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as
a result of reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for
comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means.
, 0688120934
Question 1: Theoretical Framework
a)
Ecological systems theory, developed by Bronfenbrenner (1979), remains a
foundational framework for analysing the complex interplay between a child and their
environment. This theory identifies four interconnected systems—micro, mezzo, exo,
and macro—that directly or indirectly influence a child’s development and well-being.
The micro-system consists of a child’s immediate environment, including family, peers,
and school. This level exerts the most direct influence. A nurturing home with
emotionally supportive caregivers promotes psychological well-being and secure
attachment. Positive peer relationships and an inclusive classroom can also foster
confidence and cognitive development (Donald et al., 2020). In contrast, exposure to
neglect, domestic violence, or erratic caregiving can severely compromise a child’s
emotional regulation and sense of safety (DSD et al., 2022).
The mezzo-system involves the interrelations among micro-systems, such as parent–
teacher relationships or family–community dynamics. Effective communication between
parents and teachers, for example, can reinforce learning and behavioural consistency.
Conversely, fragmented relationships or lack of parental involvement in schooling may
hinder the child’s academic and social progress (Van Breda, 2021).
The exo-system comprises settings the child does not actively participate in but which
still affect their development. These include a parent’s workplace, healthcare systems,
and local welfare services. If a caregiver’s employment provides stable income and
work–life balance, the child may benefit from improved living conditions and attention.
However, factors such as parental job loss or inaccessible clinics can cause stress that
trickles down to the child (Hall & Sambu, 2022).
The macro-system refers to broader societal, cultural, and policy environments. In
South Africa, frameworks like the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 and social protection
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is”
without any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as
a result of reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for
comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means.
