1 | Page
WMGT 101-22A EXAM 3/ACTUAL EXAM QUESTIONS
WITH COMPLETE SOLUTIONS!!/NEWEST UPDATE
Questions and Correct Answers/ Latest Update /
Already Graded
AFI 10-245, Antiterrorism
Ans: CE shall: have at least 1 engineer at each base must complete Security Eng
AT Planning & Design Course, review, document, and track construction projects
AT compliance, provide vulnerability assessment protection option program
(VAPO) analysis for all critical facilities and off-base leases, and work with the
Base Antiterrorism Officer
Antiterrorism Requirement Planning
Ans: 1. UFC 4-020-01
2. Is only the minimum standard required?
3. Yes: construction standoff distance available?
No: UFC 4-020-02 and support manuals
4. If standoff distance is available, apply UFC 4-010-01 and support manuals
Design Basis Threat (DBT)
Ans: Baseline threat used in the design of protective measures
Initial DBT
Ans: Based on planning team, local intel and Geographic Combatant Command
(COCOM) Theater-Wide threat assessments
Modify Initial DBT
Ans: Local threat assessments
© 2025/ 2026 | ® All rights reserved
, 2 | Page
Level of Protection
Ans: The degree to which an asset is protected, defines the amount of damage a
facility or asset can sustain during an attack
LOP: Very low
Ans: Progressive collapse is unlikely, but space in and around damaged area will
be unusable and onset of structural collapse occurs. Glazing is likely to be
propelled into the building and cause serious injuries. Doors may be propelled
into rooms, presenting serious hazards.
LOP: Low
Ans: Building will not be economically repairable and space in and around
damaged area will not be usable, but progressive collapse will not occur. Glazing
will fracture and may come out of the frame, but does not present a significant
injury hazard. Doors may fail but present minimal hazards.
LOP: Medium
Ans: Minor damage, space in and around damaged area can be used and will be
fully functional after cleanup and repairs. Glazing will fracture but remain in the
frame. Doors may stay in frames but will not be reusable.
LOP: High
Ans: Minimal to no damage with no permanent definitions. Glazing will not
break. Doors will be reusable.
UFC 4-010-01
Ans: DoD minimum antiterrorism standards for buildings. Intent is to reduce
mass casualties, minimize collateral damage to nearby facilities, and facilitate future
upgrades and increases FPCON.
© 2025/ 2026 | ® All rights reserved
, 3 | Page
UFC 4-020-01
Ans: DoD Security Engineering Facility Planning Manual. Acts as a starting point
for Garrison Antiterrorism and a quantitative risk-based model. Uses scoring
model to evaluate asset value (0-1.0), threat likelihood (0-1.0), and use of
minimum AT standards (<0.5). Includes cost data and helps establish a DBT and
required LOP.
AT/FP misconceptions
Ans: 1. Bollards, fences, curbs, and barriers are and adequate substitution for
standoff
2. Existing roads must be moved away from existing buildings
3. All building require standoff
Mandatory design standards
Ans: Standard 1: Standoff distance
Standard 6: Progressive collapse
Standard 10: Glazing
Standard 16: Air Intakes
Minimum standoff distance
Ans: Smallest permissible standoff distance for new and existing construction,
regardless of analysis or hardening of the building. Not used for master planning
or programming.
Conventional construction standoff distance
Ans: Standoff distance at which conventional construction may be used for
buildings. Applies for wall types/parameters in Table 2-3. Windows and doors are
designed separately.
Master planning standoff distance
© 2025/ 2026 | ® All rights reserved
WMGT 101-22A EXAM 3/ACTUAL EXAM QUESTIONS
WITH COMPLETE SOLUTIONS!!/NEWEST UPDATE
Questions and Correct Answers/ Latest Update /
Already Graded
AFI 10-245, Antiterrorism
Ans: CE shall: have at least 1 engineer at each base must complete Security Eng
AT Planning & Design Course, review, document, and track construction projects
AT compliance, provide vulnerability assessment protection option program
(VAPO) analysis for all critical facilities and off-base leases, and work with the
Base Antiterrorism Officer
Antiterrorism Requirement Planning
Ans: 1. UFC 4-020-01
2. Is only the minimum standard required?
3. Yes: construction standoff distance available?
No: UFC 4-020-02 and support manuals
4. If standoff distance is available, apply UFC 4-010-01 and support manuals
Design Basis Threat (DBT)
Ans: Baseline threat used in the design of protective measures
Initial DBT
Ans: Based on planning team, local intel and Geographic Combatant Command
(COCOM) Theater-Wide threat assessments
Modify Initial DBT
Ans: Local threat assessments
© 2025/ 2026 | ® All rights reserved
, 2 | Page
Level of Protection
Ans: The degree to which an asset is protected, defines the amount of damage a
facility or asset can sustain during an attack
LOP: Very low
Ans: Progressive collapse is unlikely, but space in and around damaged area will
be unusable and onset of structural collapse occurs. Glazing is likely to be
propelled into the building and cause serious injuries. Doors may be propelled
into rooms, presenting serious hazards.
LOP: Low
Ans: Building will not be economically repairable and space in and around
damaged area will not be usable, but progressive collapse will not occur. Glazing
will fracture and may come out of the frame, but does not present a significant
injury hazard. Doors may fail but present minimal hazards.
LOP: Medium
Ans: Minor damage, space in and around damaged area can be used and will be
fully functional after cleanup and repairs. Glazing will fracture but remain in the
frame. Doors may stay in frames but will not be reusable.
LOP: High
Ans: Minimal to no damage with no permanent definitions. Glazing will not
break. Doors will be reusable.
UFC 4-010-01
Ans: DoD minimum antiterrorism standards for buildings. Intent is to reduce
mass casualties, minimize collateral damage to nearby facilities, and facilitate future
upgrades and increases FPCON.
© 2025/ 2026 | ® All rights reserved
, 3 | Page
UFC 4-020-01
Ans: DoD Security Engineering Facility Planning Manual. Acts as a starting point
for Garrison Antiterrorism and a quantitative risk-based model. Uses scoring
model to evaluate asset value (0-1.0), threat likelihood (0-1.0), and use of
minimum AT standards (<0.5). Includes cost data and helps establish a DBT and
required LOP.
AT/FP misconceptions
Ans: 1. Bollards, fences, curbs, and barriers are and adequate substitution for
standoff
2. Existing roads must be moved away from existing buildings
3. All building require standoff
Mandatory design standards
Ans: Standard 1: Standoff distance
Standard 6: Progressive collapse
Standard 10: Glazing
Standard 16: Air Intakes
Minimum standoff distance
Ans: Smallest permissible standoff distance for new and existing construction,
regardless of analysis or hardening of the building. Not used for master planning
or programming.
Conventional construction standoff distance
Ans: Standoff distance at which conventional construction may be used for
buildings. Applies for wall types/parameters in Table 2-3. Windows and doors are
designed separately.
Master planning standoff distance
© 2025/ 2026 | ® All rights reserved
