100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

LCP4807 Assignment 2 (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED

Rating
-
Sold
2
Pages
13
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
28-04-2025
Written in
2024/2025

LCP4807 Assignment 2 (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED Answers, guidelines, workings and references , The Republic of Qwanza is a Southern African country with a constitution which is a replica of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) adopted in 2004. Qwanza has ratified the major UN human rights instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR); the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (including the two optional protocols), International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) including its optional Protocols. Qwanza has also ratified the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights; The Protocol Establishing the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. On 15 May 2022 a man was murdered near Bali village in the Republic of Qwanza. Mr Timothy Ibo was accused of committing the crime and brought to trial. He denied the offence. On 15 June 2023 the High Court in Qwanza convicted him of the murder and sentenced him to death, the only sentence available for the offence of murder under Qwanza law. According to Section 46 of the 1960 Criminal and Other Offences Act of Qwanza “a person who commits murder is liable to suffer death.” Mr Ibo claims that the death sentence as provided for in the Criminal and Other Offences Act is unconstitutional and violates several human rights as provided for in the Constitution of Qwanza as well as international human rights instruments that Qwanza has ratified. He then appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal and challenged the conviction and sentence. On 16 March 2024 the Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal both on the conviction and sentence. Mr Ibo further appealed both the conviction and sentence to the Constitutional Court which is the highest court in Qwanza. In November 2024, the Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal against the conviction and rejected the merits of Mr Ibo’s challenge to the Constitutionality of the mandatory death penalty, by holding that the mandatory death sentence for murder was consistent with the laws of Qwanza. The Association for Lawyers Against Death Penalty (ALADP) an International Non-Governmental-Organisation which provides legal representation and assistance to individuals facing death penalty would like to institute legal proceedings against the Republic of Qwanza on behalf of Mr Ibo. ALADP would like to take the matter to the Human Rights Committee of the ICCPR. They approach you as an expert in international human rights law for advice/legal opinion. Using the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and other relevant United Nations and African Union instruments advise ALADP. In your legal opinion reflect on whether ALADP can take the case to the Human Rights Committee (HRC). Use authority to justify your answers. Highlight the following points: a) The procedural issues involved in bringing a case before the HRC. b) Merits of the case. c) Alleged rights that the death penalty violates. d) The remedies that the HRC can grant.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
April 28, 2025
Number of pages
13
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

LCP4807
Assignment 2 Semester 1 2025
Unique #:

Due Date: 29 April 2025

Detailed solutions, explanations, workings
and references.

+27 81 278 3372

, LEGAL OPINION ON BRINGING THE CASE OF MR TIMOTHY IBO BEFORE
THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE (HRC)

This legal opinion provides a critical analysis of the procedural viability of taking
Mr Ibo's case before the HRC, assesses the merits of the case, identifies the
specific rights allegedly violated by the imposition of the death penalty, and
outlines the remedies available through the HRC. In doing so, the opinion draws
upon the ICCPR, its Optional Protocols, and relevant African regional
instruments, offering authoritative references throughout.



1. PROCEDURAL ISSUES INVOLVED IN BRINGING A CASE BEFORE THE
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE

1.1 The Human Rights Committee and Its Jurisdiction

The Human Rights Committee (HRC) was established under Article 28 of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) to supervise the
implementation of state parties' obligations under the Covenant.1 However, the
Committee’s jurisdiction to receive and consider individual communications is not
inherent; it is contingent upon the state party's ratification of the First Optional
Protocol to the ICCPR.2 A state must be party to both the Covenant and the
Protocol for individuals under its jurisdiction to submit communications.3 As the
Republic of Qwanza has ratified both the ICCPR and the First Optional Protocol,
it has accepted the competence of the HRC to hear individual complaints. Thus,
the Association for Lawyers Against Death Penalty (ALADP), acting on behalf of
Mr Ibo, may theoretically lodge a communication before the Committee.

1.2 Standing to Bring a Communication

Article 1 of the First Optional Protocol stipulates that a communication must be
brought by an individual who claims to be a victim of a violation of the ICCPR
rights.4 However, representatives acting on behalf of victims, such as


1
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, Article 28.
2
First Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, Preamble.
3
Mmatsie Mooki and Posche Makama, International Human Rights Law: Only Study Guide for LCP4807
(University of South Africa 2019) 24.
4
First Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, Article 1.


Varsity Cube 2025 +27 81 278 3372

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
VarsityC AAA School of Advertising
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
28681
Member since
8 year
Number of followers
13258
Documents
3117
Last sold
5 days ago

4.1

2819 reviews

5
1490
4
581
3
392
2
117
1
239

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions