Answers 100% Pass
As the contracting officer for the newly awarded EQG software design contract, you
have completed debriefing a losing offeror. The losing offeror declares at the end of
the debriefing that the agency did an improper cost/technical tradeoff analysis and
expresses the intent to protest. Given this situation, which of the following forums
would be most likely to not hear a protest challenging the source selection decision?
- ✔✔civilian board of contract appeals
which protest PARTICIPANT is likely to schedule a hearing to resolve issues raised
in a protest? - ✔✔GAO
Which protest PARTICIPANT examines the protest to ensure that it is timely,
identifies the basis for the protest, and renders a written decision with factual detail
explaining the decision? - ✔✔Contracting agency
What party fits the GAO "interested party" definition and therefore can file a protest
to an agency procurement? - ✔✔An agency tender official under an A-76
competition
Two days after awarding the featherweight hypothermic undergarment production
contract, you receive a registered letter containing an agency level protest from an
interested party challenging the award. The protester claims that the solicitation
contained ambiguous data which resulted in the company not receiving the award.
Given this situation, which of the following would be the appropriate procedure? -
✔✔NOT: withhold the award pending resolution of the protest
COPYRIGHT © 2025 BY SOPHIA BENNETT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 1
, Which is correct about an assignment of claims? - ✔✔an assignment of claims is used
to help contractors obtain private financing for Government contract
The contractor currently working on your service contract has just been awarded
another service contract in the amount of $10,000 for janitorial work in DAU
building #7. He has never asked for nor received an assignment of claims before. He
decided that he would like the recently awarded service contract payments to go
directly to his bank. An assignment of claims is permissible in this situation. -
✔✔True
The Air Force contracted to purchase a quantity of portable electric hand drills.
Because the drill was a commercial item, the contract contained the provisions found
in FAR 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions --Commercial Items. When the
contractor delivered the drills, the Government issued a written acceptance and
distributed the drills to the field, without inspecting them. Air Force civil
engineering personnel soon found that the drills, in normal use, overheated and
burned out their batteries prematurely due to a defect. In using the drill, the
government did not substantially change its condition. What can the Government do
to remedy the situation? - ✔✔NOT: The Government can enforce its remedies, but
only to the extent they are contained in an express warranty
NOT:Nothing, because the Government waived any remedy when it failed to inspect
the frill for defects
The Navy competitively awards a firm fixed price contract for manufacture and
delivery of 100 specially designed radios, for use onboard Navy vessels. These
radios are not commercial items; they are built to a design specification provided by
the government. The contract contains the Changes clause for fixed price supply and
service contracts, FAR 52.243-1. Two months into contract performance, the
requiring activity informs the contracting officer that it will need an additional 25
radios. The Contracting Officer unilaterally issues a change pursuant to the changes
clause to increase the contract quantity from 100 to 125. Is this a proper action? -
COPYRIGHT © 2025 BY SOPHIA BENNETT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2