100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

CON 2370 Simplified Acquisition Procedures questions with verified answer4

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
25
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
16-04-2025
Written in
2024/2025

CON 2370 Simplified Acquisition Procedures questions with verified answer4

Institution
CON 2370 Simplified Acquistion Procedures
Course
CON 2370 Simplified Acquistion Procedures










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
CON 2370 Simplified Acquistion Procedures
Course
CON 2370 Simplified Acquistion Procedures

Document information

Uploaded on
April 16, 2025
Number of pages
25
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

CON 2370 Simplified Acquisition Procedures
questions with verified answers
Only one quote was received in response to your competitive solicitation for
Government-unique tool kits that utilized the lowest price technically acceptable
source selection process. The quote, from Tool Warehouse, was determined to be
technically acceptable and was for a price of $124,500.


Which one of the following statements about the award decision is correct?
Ans✓✓✓ Not - The requirement must be reconsolidated in order to obtain
competition.


Six quotes were received in response to your solicitation for new office
equipment that utilized the lowest price technically acceptable source selection
process. The quotes submitted by vendors A, B, and D were determined to be
technically acceptable.
Vendor A quoted a price of $146,500;Vendor B quoted a price of $128,250; and
Vendor D quoted a price of $132,800.


Which one of the following statements about the award decision is correct?
Ans✓✓✓ Vendor B is the apparent awardee and price reasonableness would be
based on competition


Take 13 Ans✓✓✓ take 13


Three quotes were received in response to your solicitation for training services.
Evaluation was based on a tradeoff between price and past performance. The
assigned past performance ratings and quoted prices were as follows:
Vendor A - Unacceptable, $216,150;

,Vendor B - Acceptable, $248,500; and
Vendor C - Outstanding, $237,200.


Which one of the following statements about the award decision is correct?
Ans✓✓✓ Not - Vendor B is the apparent awardee and price reasonableness
could be based on any reasonable basis


Not - Vendor A is the apparent awardee and price reasonableness would be based
on competition


Vendor c


Which one of the following is correct regarding documenting the award of a buy
using SAP? Ans✓✓✓ Not - Award documentation must be extensive and detailed


Not - Records of oral price quotations are not required


Not - Records of oral price quotations must be established to clearly reflect the
appropriateness of the award decision.


Not - Comparison of competitive quotes or offers is the least preferred method
for determining price reasonableness.


Which one of the following is NOT a mandatory Government source for satisfying
a supply requirement? Ans✓✓✓ Not - Excess from other agencies

, Not - Wholesale supply sources


Commercial sources


Which one of the following is NOT correct regarding documenting the award of a
buy using SAP? Ans✓✓✓ 19. Maybe not - Records of oral price quotations must
be established to clearly reflect the appropriateness of the award decision.


Not - Price reasonableness should be based on competitive quotes or offers
whenever possible.


Not - A statement of price reasonableness is not required when only one quote or
offer is received.


Which one of the following is NOT one of the first steps taken when quotations
are received in response to a solicitation using SAP? Ans✓✓✓ Not - Reviewing
the quotations for responsibility


Not - Reviewing electronic and digital submission to ensure they are readable


Not - Ranking the quotations by technical acceptability


Ensuring quotations are marked with the date and time they were received


7. Documenting the quotations with the date and time they were received

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
cracker Chamberlain School Of Nursing
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
2014
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
1342
Documents
46921
Last sold
2 hours ago
✨ Cracker – Verified Study Powerhouse

Welcome to your shortcut to academic and certification success. I'm Cracker, a trusted top seller I specialize in high-quality study guides, test banks, certification prep, and real-world exam material all tailored to help you pass fast and score high.

3.8

370 reviews

5
162
4
84
3
53
2
22
1
49

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions