AQA_2024: A-level History - Component 2N
Revolution and Dictatorship: Russia, 1917–1953
(Merged Question Paper and Marking Scheme)
A-level
HISTORY
Component 2N Revolution and dictatorship: Russia, 1917–1953
Friday 7 June 2024 Afternoon Time allowed: 2 hours 30 minutes
Materials
For this paper you must have:
an AQA 16-page answer book.
Instructions
Use black ink or black ball-point pen.
Write the information required on the front of your answer book. The Paper Reference is
7042/2N.
Answer three questions.
In Section A answer Question 01.
In Section B answer two questions.
Information
The marks for questions are shown in brackets.
The maximum mark for this paper is 80.
You will be marked on your ability to:
– use good English
– organise information clearly
– use specialist vocabulary where appropriate.
Advice
You are advised to spend about:
– 1 hour on Question 01 from Section A
– 45 minutes on each of the two questions answered from Section B.
IB/M/Jun24/7042/2N
, 3
Key areas:
1. The Russian Revolution of 1917:
February Revolution (1917): The collapse of the Tsarist regime under Nicholas II, leading to the
establishment of a Provisional Government.
October Revolution (1917): Led by Lenin and the Bolsheviks, this revolution overthrew the
Provisional Government, establishing a Soviet state.
Bolshevik Consolidation of Power: Lenin and the Bolsheviks faced opposition from other factions
(Mensheviks, Social Revolutionaries) and civil unrest, but they consolidated power through
measures like peace with Germany (Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, 1918) and the suppression of
opposition.
2. The Civil War and War Communism (1918–1921):
Russian Civil War (1918–1921): Fought between the Bolshevik Red Army and the anti-
Bolshevik White Army, with foreign intervention and widespread chaos. The Bolsheviks emerged
victorious.
War Communism: A series of economic policies, including nationalization and forced grain
requisitioning, that aimed to support the war effort but led to widespread famine and discontent.
3. The Rise of Stalin (1924–1929):
Lenin’s Death (1924): After Lenin’s death, a power struggle ensued, with Stalin eventually
outmaneuvering rivals like Trotsky to consolidate power.
Stalin’s Policies: He implemented a series of economic policies, including forced collectivization
of agriculture and industrialization, and began to centralize power under his control.
4. The Great Terror and Purges (1930s):
Great Purges (1936–1938): Stalin sought to eliminate any potential threats to his power, leading to
mass arrests, show trials, and executions, including many high-ranking members of the Communist
Party and military.
Political Repression: The NKVD (Secret Police) played a key role in silencing opposition, creating
a climate of fear throughout Soviet society.
5. The Second World War and Its Aftermath (1939–1945):
Soviet Entry into WWII: Initially, Stalin signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact (1939), but after the German
invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, the USSR entered the war.
Victory and Consequences: The Soviet Union played a pivotal role in the defeat of Nazi Germany,
but at a huge cost—millions of Soviet lives lost, and vast areas of the USSR were devastated.
Post-War Soviet Expansion: The USSR emerged as a superpower, extending its influence over
Eastern Europe, beginning the Cold War with the United States.
6. Stalin’s Legacy (1945–1953):
Economic and Social Changes: Stalin's policies of collectivization and industrialization
transformed Soviet society, though at great human cost. The economy grew, but with widespread
repression.
Death of Stalin (1953): Stalin's death marked the end of his dictatorship, leading to a power
struggle and eventual de-Stalinization under Khrushchev.
IB/M/Jun24/7042/2N Turn over ►
, 4
IB/M/Jun24/G4006/E2 7042/2N
Section A
Answer Question 01.
Source A
From a statement issued by the Communist Party (CPSU) Congress, January 1924. The
Congress had voted in favour of the policies of the triumvirate of Stalin, Kamenev and
Zinoviev.
The opposition headed by Trotsky has tried to accuse the party of a lack of democracy
and excessive bureaucracy. Such direct attempts to discredit the party apparatus cannot
lead to anything other than the separation of government institutions from the party. The
opposition has revealed a completely un-Bolshevik approach to the question of party
discipline. This is reminiscent of when Lenin had to struggle against the destructive 5
views of intellectuals in questions of organisation and defend the foundations of
proletarian discipline in the party. The opposition has violated the decision made by the
Tenth Congress in March 1921 which prohibited the formation of factions within the party.
They seek to make the Central Committee an intermediary between factions. This view
of the party has nothing in common with Leninism. The opposition is a threat to the unity 10
of the state apparatus. These factional moves by the opposition have strengthened the
hopes of all enemies of the party.
Source B
From a speech given whilst under arrest, to the CPSU Congress, by the economist,
Preobrazhensky, 1934. Preobrazhensky was exiled in 1927, returned after denouncing
Trotskyism, but was arrested.
In the years 1923 to 1927, I was considered the chief economist of the Trotskyist
Opposition. My works, including ‘New Economics’, which discussed ways of
accumulating capital for industrialisation, were used as weapons in the struggle between
Stalin and the Left Opposition led by Trotsky. My important error consisted in
mechanically comparing our economy with western capitalism and showing a lack of faith 5
in, and contempt for, the Russian peasantry. My views were shared by the Trotskyists,
who were committed to ‘permanent revolution’, supporting the Comintern in fomenting
world-wide revolution. Like me, the Trotskyists assumed that socialist change would be a
rather long evolutionary process. I had parted company with true Leninism but events
wholly disproved what I had asserted. Lenin’s views triumphantly became reality under 10
Stalin’s leadership. Collectivisation, that is the essential point. Did I foresee
collectivisation? I did not. What was needed was Stalin’s remarkable far-sightedness,
his great courage in facing the problems and applying policies.
IB/M/Jun24/7042/2N