WGU C963 Pretest Exam With Complete
Solutions 100% Verified!!
The means of execution must utilize the most modern scientific technology available. -
Answer >>Factual determinations necessary to decide upon a sentence of death must
be made by a jury.
What was the holding of the Supreme Court in the case of Miranda v. Arizona?
It guarded suspects of criminal activity from unlawful searches by law enforcement
officials.
It ensured that law enforcement officials apprise individuals suspected of a crime of
their constitutional rights.
It mandated states to supply publicly appointed attorneys to individuals unable to afford
legal representation.
It prevented people from having evidence obtained against them through illegal means
to be used against them within state courts. - Answer >>It forced police officers to tell
those suspected of committing a crime of their constitutional rights.
Which best characterizes the Supreme Court's ruling in Mapp v. Ohio?
Police officers do not have to obtain a search warrant in cases involving drug-sniffing
dogs.
Evidence obtained because it was in plain view does not require a warrant to present in
court.
,Evidence that is obtained without a warrant, which also does not fall under the
exclusionary rule, cannot be used.
Police officers must have a warrant to search even when the suspect has given consent.
- Answer >>Evidence obtained without a warrant that does not fall under the
exclusionary rule is not admissible.
What is a reason people can be convicted of a crime without jury trial under the Sixth
Amendment?
They cannot afford legal council.
They do not understand their rights.
They accept a plea bargain.
They choose to represent themselves. - Answer >>They accept a plea bargain.
Which amendment concerns the rights of individuals engaged in civil disputes?
The Fifth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment
The Seventh Amendment
The Eighth Amendment - Answer >>The Seventh Amendment
What was the result of this decision in Plessy v. Ferguson?
It allowed for racial segregation by establishing the "separate but equal" doctrine.
It barred African Americans from serving on juries.
It barred African Americans from holding elective offices.
, It allowed states to use literacy tests when determining who could vote. - Answer >>It
allowed for racial segregation by establishing the "separate but equal" doctrine.
In which of the following types of cases would the Supreme Court use the standard of
strict scrutiny?
Cases that limit the fundamental rights of protected classes
Cases involving job discrimination against women
Cases involving restriction of rights against foreign nationals
Cases that involve discrimination against people with lower incomes - Answer >>Cases
that restrict fundamental rights of protected classes
Why did the Supreme Court rule in the Brown v. Board decision that the
separate-but-equal provision in Plessy v. Ferguson was unconstitutional?
It violated First Amendment freedom to assemble.
It violated the due process clause protected by the Fifth Amendment.
It violated implied protection rights under the Ninth Amendment.
It violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - Answer >>It
violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Which right is protected under the free exercise clause of the Constitution?
Solutions 100% Verified!!
The means of execution must utilize the most modern scientific technology available. -
Answer >>Factual determinations necessary to decide upon a sentence of death must
be made by a jury.
What was the holding of the Supreme Court in the case of Miranda v. Arizona?
It guarded suspects of criminal activity from unlawful searches by law enforcement
officials.
It ensured that law enforcement officials apprise individuals suspected of a crime of
their constitutional rights.
It mandated states to supply publicly appointed attorneys to individuals unable to afford
legal representation.
It prevented people from having evidence obtained against them through illegal means
to be used against them within state courts. - Answer >>It forced police officers to tell
those suspected of committing a crime of their constitutional rights.
Which best characterizes the Supreme Court's ruling in Mapp v. Ohio?
Police officers do not have to obtain a search warrant in cases involving drug-sniffing
dogs.
Evidence obtained because it was in plain view does not require a warrant to present in
court.
,Evidence that is obtained without a warrant, which also does not fall under the
exclusionary rule, cannot be used.
Police officers must have a warrant to search even when the suspect has given consent.
- Answer >>Evidence obtained without a warrant that does not fall under the
exclusionary rule is not admissible.
What is a reason people can be convicted of a crime without jury trial under the Sixth
Amendment?
They cannot afford legal council.
They do not understand their rights.
They accept a plea bargain.
They choose to represent themselves. - Answer >>They accept a plea bargain.
Which amendment concerns the rights of individuals engaged in civil disputes?
The Fifth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment
The Seventh Amendment
The Eighth Amendment - Answer >>The Seventh Amendment
What was the result of this decision in Plessy v. Ferguson?
It allowed for racial segregation by establishing the "separate but equal" doctrine.
It barred African Americans from serving on juries.
It barred African Americans from holding elective offices.
, It allowed states to use literacy tests when determining who could vote. - Answer >>It
allowed for racial segregation by establishing the "separate but equal" doctrine.
In which of the following types of cases would the Supreme Court use the standard of
strict scrutiny?
Cases that limit the fundamental rights of protected classes
Cases involving job discrimination against women
Cases involving restriction of rights against foreign nationals
Cases that involve discrimination against people with lower incomes - Answer >>Cases
that restrict fundamental rights of protected classes
Why did the Supreme Court rule in the Brown v. Board decision that the
separate-but-equal provision in Plessy v. Ferguson was unconstitutional?
It violated First Amendment freedom to assemble.
It violated the due process clause protected by the Fifth Amendment.
It violated implied protection rights under the Ninth Amendment.
It violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - Answer >>It
violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Which right is protected under the free exercise clause of the Constitution?
