100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

PVL3702 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 (198635) - DUE 7 April 2025

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
10
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
27-01-2025
Written in
2024/2025

PVL3702 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 (198635) - DUE 7 April 2025 correct questions and answers and for any assignment assistance or getting any latest exam packs kindly email at ,,, Jack is a property developer who is well known for building residential developments. He recently built cluster homes in an upmarket suburb in Cape Town. All the cluster homes are built with the same size and layout, and they only differ with the positioning of each cluster in the complex. This development is brand new, and Jack appoints Sandy as his estate agent to market the sale of the cluster homes. Sandy shows Gloria a beautiful cluster home in the complex, which is next to the guardhouse at the entrance of the complex. Gloria immediately falls in love with this cluster home and a few days later she signs the offer to purchase document presented to her by Gloria, who completed all the relevant details on the document relating to the description of the property. The document is later also signed by Jack as the seller. However, it subsequently turns out that the cluster home referred to in the signed document is not the one that Gloria viewed and fell in love with. The one she signed for and the one she viewed are different properties. In fact, the cluster home she signed for is right at the back of the complex, which is not in the best position in the complex. Jack is of the view that a legally binding contract was concluded with Gloria, in accordance with the written signed document, for the cluster home described in this document. Gloria approaches you for legal advice as she thought that she was signing for the cluster home that was next to the guardhouse at the entrance of the complex. Apply the will theory and the iustus error doctrine and advise Gloria whether she concluded a legally binding contract with Jack, based on the written document that they both signed, for the cluster home described in this document. Discuss fully and refer to case law in your answer. Do not apply the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008. Jack wants to sell his Yamaha speedboat. He approaches Jill, who sells speedboats for a living, and asks her if she is interested in buying his Yamaha speedboat. Jill signs a written offer and submits it to Jack for the Yamaha speedboat for R200 000, in a document titled “Contract of Sale.” The offer sets out all the relevant and material terms, and it includes the following clause: “This offer is irrevocable and expires at noon on 5 March 2024, and upon signature by the seller will indicate his acceptance, as well as the conclusion of a valid contract of sale.” On 4 March 2024 Jack signs the contract of sale document and he inserts the date of his signature therein, but he forgets to immediately inform Jill that he has done so. Only on 8 March 2024, Jack informs Jill of his acceptance. Jill indicates to Jack that her offer lapsed on 5 March 2024, and that Jack did not inform her of his acceptance timeously. Jill further informs Jack that she no longer wants to purchase the Yamaha speedboat. Jack approaches you for legal advice. Assume that a valid offer was made by Jill to Jack for the Yamaha speedboat. You must assume further that Jacks acceptance was unqualified, and that he was the correct person to accept Jill’s offer because the offer was made to him, and also that he was conscious and aware of the offer that was made to him when he signed the contract of sale document. You must advise Jack only about the relevant aspects of his acceptance which are pertinent for this factual scenario, by making reference to the case law that you were required to read, and by also referring to the prescribed textbook. You must further advise Jack about his concern that he only informed Jill after 5 March 2024, that he accepted Jill’s offer. Ultimately you must advise Jack if a legally binding contract was concluded between him and Jill. Discuss fully. Do not apply the direct reliance theory and the iustus error doctrine to this question. Also do not apply the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
January 27, 2025
Number of pages
10
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

PVL3702
PVL3702 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 1 2025 (198635)




DUE 7 April 2025

, ACTIVITIES


Jack is a property developer who is well known for building residential developments. He recently
built cluster homes in an upmarket suburb in Cape Town. All the cluster homes are built with the
same size and layout, and they only differ with the positioning of each cluster in the complex. This
development is brand new, and Jack appoints Sandy as his estate agent to market the sale of the
cluster homes. Sandy shows Gloria a beautiful cluster home in the complex, which is next to the
guardhouse at the entrance of the complex. Gloria immediately falls in love with this cluster home
and a few days later she signs the offer to purchase document presented to her by Gloria, who
completed all the relevant details on the document relating to the description of the property. The
document is later also signed by Jack as the seller. However, it subsequently turns out that the cluster
home referred to in the signed document is not the one that Gloria viewed and fell in love with. The
one she signed for and the one she viewed are different properties. In fact, the cluster home she
signed for is right at the back of the complex, which is not in the best position in the complex. Jack is
of the view that a legally binding contract was concluded with Gloria, in accordance with the written
signed document, for the cluster home described in this document. Gloria approaches you for legal
advice as she thought that she was signing for the cluster home that was next to the guardhouse at
the entrance of the complex. Apply the will theory and the iustus error doctrine and advise Gloria
whether she concluded a legally binding contract with Jack, based on the written document that they
both signed, for the cluster home described in this document. Discuss fully and refer to case law in
your answer. Do not apply the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008. Jack wants to sell his Yamaha
speedboat. He approaches Jill, who sells speedboats for a living, and asks her if she is interested in
buying his Yamaha speedboat. Jill signs a written offer and submits it to Jack for the Yamaha
speedboat for R200 000, in a document titled “Contract of Sale.” The offer sets out all the relevant
and material terms, and it includes the following clause: “This offer is irrevocable and expires at noon
on 5 March 2024, and upon signature by the seller will indicate his acceptance, as well as the
conclusion of a valid contract of sale.” On 4 March 2024 Jack signs the contract of sale document and
he inserts the date of his signature therein, but he forgets to immediately inform Jill that he has done
so. Only on 8 March 2024, Jack informs Jill of his acceptance. Jill indicates to Jack that her offer lapsed
on 5 March 2024, and that Jack did not inform her of his acceptance timeously. Jill further informs
Jack that she no longer wants to purchase the Yamaha speedboat. Jack approaches you for legal
advice. Assume that a valid offer was made by Jill to Jack for the Yamaha speedboat. You must
assume further that Jacks acceptance was unqualified, and that he was the correct person to accept
Jill’s offer because the offer was made to him, and also that he was conscious and aware of the offer
that was made to him when he signed the contract of sale document. You must advise Jack only

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
ochiengglorious5 Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
49
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
1
Documents
85
Last sold
1 month ago

4.0

10 reviews

5
5
4
2
3
2
2
0
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions