100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Social Psychology Final Exam Questions With Correct Answers

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
28
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
12-11-2024
Written in
2024/2025

Social Psychology Final Exam Questions With Correct Answers David is on his way to a job interview. He really wants the job as it is in a convenient location, only a 10- minute walk away from where he lives. As he is on his way there, he encounters what looks like a man in distress. The man is in the middle of the sidewalk and looks passed out. According to a study you read about on seminary students going to record a sermon in another building, under which conditions is David more likely to help this man in distress. (CHOOSE ALL THAT APPLY) - answerDavid is more likely to help if he left early for his interview (such that he would have gotten there 20 minutes early), compared to if he left and planned to arrive just on time. We reviewed an experiment where participants played a two-player game in which each player independently had to make a choice between two options. The game was designed such that one of the options maximized a player's individual payoff and the other option maximized the joint payoff. The results showed that participants were more likely to choose the option that maximized the joint payoff in a condition where the game was labelled "The Community Game" than in a condition where the game was labelled "The Wall Street Game". This result illustrates the influence of which of the following situational influence principles? (CHOOSE ALL THAT APPLY) - answer- The influence of framing on behaviour. - How a person's behaviour is influenced by their subjective interpretation of the situation Which of the following factors INCREASED the levels of obedience that was shown by participants who were assigned to the role of "teacher" in Milgram's famous obedience experiments? - answerHaving another confederate deliver the shocks while the real participant just reads the word-pairs to the "learner." Stanley Milgram conducted a follow-up survey of people who participated in his original obedience experiments. He had a psychiatrist conduct clinical interviews with his experiment participants to determine if there was any lasting psychological damage from participating in the study. ©THEBRIGHT EXAM SOLUTIONS 11/6/2024 12:22 AM What did the results of these follow-up evaluations reveal? (CHOOSE ALL THAT APPLY) - answer- The majority of the participants reported that they were either "glad" or "very glad" that they had taken part in Milgram's experiment. - The psychiatrist found that Milgram's participants experienced the experiment as highly stressful but there was no evidence of residual trauma or psychological damage. Psychologist Jerry Burger conducted a 21st century replication of the Milgram experiment that was carefully designed to address some of the ethical concerns about Milgram's original research design. Which of the following was a key modification that Burger made to Milgram's study? (CHOOSE ALL THAT APPLY) - answer- Before the study began when the participant was asked to provide informed consent the researchers strongly emphasized that the participant had the right to withdraw from the study at any point without any penalty or loss of compensation. - Burger modified the experiment so that it was stopped after the participant made a decision about whether they would continue to follow the authority's commands to shock the Learner at the 150-volt level of the experimental procedure. Sally is one of many gardeners who takes care Waterloo's various public spaces. One morning, Sally and her colleagues get an email from the Waterloo mayor, telling them to spray all the public gardens with "Chemical X". Sally and her colleagues have never heard of Chemical X and reading the label it says it should not be used in publicly accessible locations as it may be harmful to humans. Based on a study you read about nurses going through a similar situation, what... 1. are Sally and her colleagues likely to do? 2. if you described this situation to a group of people, what are they likely to predict Sally and her colleagues would do? - answerMost of Sally and her colleagues would comply with spraying the chemical but people would predict that they would NOT spray the chemical. We reviewed a study in which experimenters asked one group of students (the forecasters) to forecast what they would do if they were subjected to sexual harassment during a job interview and then they measured the actual responses of another group of students (the experiencers) when they were actually subjected to sexual harassment during a job interview. ©THEBRIGHT EXAM SOLUTIONS 11/6/2024 12:22 AM Which of the following BEST summarizes the results of this study? (CHOOSE ALL THAT APPLY) - answer- The majority of the forecasters predicted that they would refuse to answer the sexually harassing questions; however, the majority of the experiencers did not overtly refuse to answer the sexually harassing questions. - None of the experiencers took confrontational actions when they were sexually harassed such as telling the interviewer off, getting up and leaving, or asking to talk to his supervisor. We reviewed research that examined videotapes of Olympic athletes' facial expressions of emotion after they learned their placement in their event. The researchers coded the athletes' facial expressions to determine whether there was any association between the medal the athletes earned and their degree of happiness. Which of the following BEST summarizes the results of this study? - answerBronze medalists appeared happier than Silver medalists. Suppose that in Stanley Milgram conducted a variation of his obedience experiment in which the Teacher was instructed to use the 150-volt shock level for the Learner's first error and move incrementally up the instrument panel from this starting point. Furthermore, imagine that after the Learner received this 150-volt shock after his first error he began protesting and said that he refused to continue and wanted the experiment to stop. Suppose that in this revised version of the experiment Milgram found that nearly all of the participants defied the Experimenter's commands to continue to shock the Learner and they stopped the experiment after this first error. Such a large reduction in the proportion of participants who complied with the Experimenter's commands would support Milgram's interpretation that which of the following mechanisms was a key factor in the high levels of obedience that he found in the original v - answerThe slippery slope process Milgram ran a version of his obedience experiment in which two other confederates who were assigned part of the Teacher duties refused to comply with the Experimenter's commands to continue to shock the Learner after he protested that he refused to continue to be shocked. Milgram found that nearly all of the participants defied the Experimenter's commands to continue to shock the Learner and they stopped the experiment before it reached the highest level of shock. This large reduction in the proportion of participants who complied with the Experimenter's commands supports Milgram's interpretation that which of the following mechanisms was a key factor in the high levels of obedience that he found in the original version of the experiment? - answerScriptlessness module 3 If a liberal judge is on a 3-judge panel in which the other two judges are conservatives, then the liberal judge's own verdict decisions in cases are ... - answermore likely to reflect the conservative ideology of the judge's colleagues.

Show more Read less
Institution
Social Psychology
Course
Social Psychology










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Social Psychology
Course
Social Psychology

Document information

Uploaded on
November 12, 2024
Number of pages
28
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

©THEBRIGHT EXAM SOLUTIONS

11/6/2024 12:22 AM


Social Psychology Final Exam Questions
With Correct Answers


David is on his way to a job interview. He really wants the job as it is in a convenient location, only a 10-
minute walk away from where he lives.

As he is on his way there, he encounters what looks like a man in distress. The man is in the middle of
the sidewalk and looks passed out.

According to a study you read about on seminary students going to record a sermon in another building,
under which conditions is David more likely to help this man in distress. (CHOOSE ALL THAT APPLY) -
answer✔David is more likely to help if he left early for his interview (such that he would have gotten
there 20 minutes early), compared to if he left and planned to arrive just on time.

We reviewed an experiment where participants played a two-player game in which each player
independently had to make a choice between two options. The game was designed such that one of the
options maximized a player's individual payoff and the other option maximized the joint payoff.

The results showed that participants were more likely to choose the option that maximized the joint
payoff in a condition where the game was labelled "The Community Game" than in a condition where
the game was labelled "The Wall Street Game".



This result illustrates the influence of which of the following situational influence principles? (CHOOSE
ALL THAT APPLY) - answer✔- The influence of framing on behaviour.



- How a person's behaviour is influenced by their subjective interpretation of the situation

Which of the following factors INCREASED the levels of obedience that was shown by participants who
were assigned to the role of "teacher" in Milgram's famous obedience experiments? - answer✔Having
another confederate deliver the shocks while the real participant just reads the word-pairs to the
"learner."

Stanley Milgram conducted a follow-up survey of people who participated in his original obedience
experiments. He had a psychiatrist conduct clinical interviews with his experiment participants to
determine if there was any lasting psychological damage from participating in the study.

, ©THEBRIGHT EXAM SOLUTIONS

11/6/2024 12:22 AM

What did the results of these follow-up evaluations reveal? (CHOOSE ALL THAT APPLY) - answer✔- The
majority of the participants reported that they were either "glad" or "very glad" that they had taken part
in Milgram's experiment.



- The psychiatrist found that Milgram's participants experienced the experiment as highly stressful but
there was no evidence of residual trauma or psychological damage.

Psychologist Jerry Burger conducted a 21st century replication of the Milgram experiment that was
carefully designed to address some of the ethical concerns about Milgram's original research design.



Which of the following was a key modification that Burger made to Milgram's study? (CHOOSE ALL THAT
APPLY) - answer✔- Before the study began when the participant was asked to provide informed consent
the researchers strongly emphasized that the participant had the right to withdraw from the study at
any point without any penalty or loss of compensation.



- Burger modified the experiment so that it was stopped after the participant made a decision about
whether they would continue to follow the authority's commands to shock the Learner at the 150-volt
level of the experimental procedure.

Sally is one of many gardeners who takes care Waterloo's various public spaces. One morning, Sally and
her colleagues get an email from the Waterloo mayor, telling them to spray all the public gardens with
"Chemical X".

Sally and her colleagues have never heard of Chemical X and reading the label it says it should not be
used in publicly accessible locations as it may be harmful to humans.

Based on a study you read about nurses going through a similar situation, what...

1. are Sally and her colleagues likely to do?

2. if you described this situation to a group of people, what are they likely to predict Sally and her
colleagues would do? - answer✔Most of Sally and her colleagues would comply with spraying the
chemical but people would predict that they would NOT spray the chemical.

We reviewed a study in which experimenters asked one group of students (the forecasters) to forecast
what they would do if they were subjected to sexual harassment during a job interview and then they
measured the actual responses of another group of students (the experiencers) when they were actually
subjected to sexual harassment during a job interview.

, ©THEBRIGHT EXAM SOLUTIONS

11/6/2024 12:22 AM

Which of the following BEST summarizes the results of this study? (CHOOSE ALL THAT APPLY) -
answer✔- The majority of the forecasters predicted that they would refuse to answer the sexually
harassing questions; however, the majority of the experiencers did not overtly refuse to answer the
sexually harassing questions.



- None of the experiencers took confrontational actions when they were sexually harassed such as
telling the interviewer off, getting up and leaving, or asking to talk to his supervisor.

We reviewed research that examined videotapes of Olympic athletes' facial expressions of emotion after
they learned their placement in their event. The researchers coded the athletes' facial expressions to
determine whether there was any association between the medal the athletes earned and their degree
of happiness.

Which of the following BEST summarizes the results of this study? - answer✔Bronze medalists appeared
happier than Silver medalists.

Suppose that in Stanley Milgram conducted a variation of his obedience experiment in which the
Teacher was instructed to use the 150-volt shock level for the Learner's first error and move
incrementally up the instrument panel from this starting point. Furthermore, imagine that after the
Learner received this 150-volt shock after his first error he began protesting and said that he refused to
continue and wanted the experiment to stop.

Suppose that in this revised version of the experiment Milgram found that nearly all of the participants
defied the Experimenter's commands to continue to shock the Learner and they stopped the experiment
after this first error. Such a large reduction in the proportion of participants who complied with the
Experimenter's commands would support Milgram's interpretation that which of the following
mechanisms was a key factor in the high levels of obedience that he found in the original v -
answer✔The slippery slope process

Milgram ran a version of his obedience experiment in which two other confederates who were assigned
part of the Teacher duties refused to comply with the Experimenter's commands to continue to shock
the Learner after he protested that he refused to continue to be shocked. Milgram found that nearly all
of the participants defied the Experimenter's commands to continue to shock the Learner and they
stopped the experiment before it reached the highest level of shock.

This large reduction in the proportion of participants who complied with the Experimenter's commands
supports Milgram's interpretation that which of the following mechanisms was a key factor in the high
levels of obedience that he found in the original version of the experiment? - answer✔Scriptlessness

module 3

If a liberal judge is on a 3-judge panel in which the other two judges are conservatives, then the liberal
judge's own verdict decisions in cases are ... - answer✔more likely to reflect the conservative ideology of
the judge's colleagues.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Thebright Florida State University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
172
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
6
Documents
11962
Last sold
2 days ago
Topscore Emporium.

On this page, you find verified, updated and accurate documents and package deals.

3.7

34 reviews

5
12
4
10
3
7
2
1
1
4

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions