100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

ECS3704 Assignment 4 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024

Rating
5.0
(1)
Sold
5
Pages
21
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
29-10-2024
Written in
2024/2025

ECS3704 Assignment 4 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024

Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
October 29, 2024
Number of pages
21
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

,ECS3704 Assignment 4 (COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2024 - DUE October 2024; 100%
TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and
explanations.
Why is the government size of the South African government
spending sometimes referred to as a fiscal cliff? i.e. the fact that
increasing government expenditure has become unsustainable.
Discuss this viewpoint with the emphasis on the reasons for
growth of government and thus the effects of financing the
rising government expenditure through taxes. We allow a
maximum amount of 2000 words. We will mark according to
the rubric below. Use the Harvard method of referencing for
citations in the text and G for language to compile the reference
list. Make sure that it is all typed and that it is your original
work (not copied or plagiarised without citing sources), we use
Turnitin. Use G online to check your grammar (South African
English). The e-portfolio follows the rubric and should be
submitted by all students as part of one PDF file. [20] Rubric
Name: Essay Assessment 4 Rubric Criteria Excellent 19 points
Good 16-18 points Poor 10 points Content/Information (60%) –
headings: 1)Introduction 2) Conceptional framework of theories
(Government growth theories) 3) Data analysis (tables/figures
and explanation as data evidence) 4) Conclusion The essay is
objective and uses in-depth analysis to address all of the issues
referred to in the proposed topic. The information provided is
relevant and pertinent to discuss these issues. The essay is
objective and for the most part, addresses the main issues

, referred to in the proposed topic. The information provided is
for the most part relevant and adequate to discuss these issues.
The essay is not sufficiently objective and does not fully address
the issues referred to in the proposed topic. The information
provided is not relevant or inadequate to discuss these issues.
The essay is for the most part off-topic. References and Use of
References, Harvard method of referencing (10%) All the
references used are appropriate and are of good/scholarly
quality. More than a minimum of scholarly resources are used
and are all very effective. Most of the references used are
appropriate and are of good/scholarly quality. The minimum of
scholarly resources is used and are for the most part effective.
Most of the references used are not appropriate, and/or are not
of good/scholarly quality and/or are not effectively used. The
minimum of scholarly resources is not reached, and/or they are
not used effectively in the essay. Quality of Writing, Spelling and
grammar check on MS Word (15%) The essay is well written
from start to finish, without spelling, grammatical, or English
usage errors. The essay is well organized, clear, and presents
ideas coherently and logically. The essay is for the most part
well written, without spelling, grammatical, or English usage
errors. The essay is for the most part well organized, clear, and
presents ideas coherently and logically. The essay is not well
written, and contains numerous spelling errors, and/or
grammatical errors and/or English usage errors. The essay is
poorly organized, lacks clarity, and/or does not present ideas
coherently and logically. Format/Layout, Introduction, body and

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
6 months ago

5.0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
THEBLAZE1 Chamberlain College Nursing
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
698
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
173
Documents
1034
Last sold
4 days ago

3.7

107 reviews

5
47
4
15
3
21
2
9
1
15

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions