CJS 305 - Exam 1 Gizzi Questions And
Answers 2024
Olmstead v. US - with answers:1928, the government can tap your phone without a warrant.
Doctrine= trespass doctrine
S/R- physical intrusion
Draper v. US - with answers:held that information from a reliable informer corroborated as to
accuracy of the informer's decryption of the accused and of the presence at a particular place,
was sufficient to establish probable cause for arrest without a warrant.
Doctrine= probable cause
S/R- can you use hearsay as probable cause in an arrest?
IL v. Gates - with answers:Doctrine= totality of circumstances
S/R= use this instead of tips, more reliable
Mapp v. Ohio - with answers:Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states
(evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court).
Doctrine= exclusionary rule
S/R- 1 deterrence of police misconduct, 2 constitutional rights, 3 judicial integrity
US v. Leon - with answers:good faith exception to the exclusionary rule
Doctrine= good faith exception
S/R= deterrence of police misconduct
Katz v. US - with answers:This 1967 Supreme Court case prohibited illegal eavesdropping and
extending the zone of privacy to include the home, office, person, and immediate public arena.
Doctrine= reasonable expectation of privacy
S/R- 2 prong test
, US v. White - with answers:Held that a person who invites someone into his or her home
assumes the risk, not only of being betrayed, but also of being recorded.
Doctrine= false friend doctrine
S/R= can't protect you if you confide in someone and they rat you out
US v. Kyllo - with answers:The use of a device by the government, which is not generally used
by the public, to obtain evidence from inside a home is a presumptively unreasonable search
without a warrant under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
-Thermal imaging
Doctrine= expectation of privacy, use of tech devices to enhance senses not available to public
use
S/R- minimal expectation of privacy in the home
Jones v. US - with answers:Anyone who has the right to be a premise and is the object of a
search has standing.
Doctrine= trespass doctrine, GPS tracking
S/R- invades privacy because intimate preferences can be seen by tracking someones
movements.
Riley v. California - with answers:Court unanimously held that the warrantless search and
seizure of digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional.
Doctrine= need a warrant to search a phone
S/R- because of privacy interests involved
constitution is both ____ and _____ - with answers:substantive; procedural
who can change the constitution? - with answers:the people, thru amendment process
who has power to interpret the constitution through judicial review? is this stated in the
constitution itself? - with answers:courts have power, not stated
Answers 2024
Olmstead v. US - with answers:1928, the government can tap your phone without a warrant.
Doctrine= trespass doctrine
S/R- physical intrusion
Draper v. US - with answers:held that information from a reliable informer corroborated as to
accuracy of the informer's decryption of the accused and of the presence at a particular place,
was sufficient to establish probable cause for arrest without a warrant.
Doctrine= probable cause
S/R- can you use hearsay as probable cause in an arrest?
IL v. Gates - with answers:Doctrine= totality of circumstances
S/R= use this instead of tips, more reliable
Mapp v. Ohio - with answers:Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states
(evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court).
Doctrine= exclusionary rule
S/R- 1 deterrence of police misconduct, 2 constitutional rights, 3 judicial integrity
US v. Leon - with answers:good faith exception to the exclusionary rule
Doctrine= good faith exception
S/R= deterrence of police misconduct
Katz v. US - with answers:This 1967 Supreme Court case prohibited illegal eavesdropping and
extending the zone of privacy to include the home, office, person, and immediate public arena.
Doctrine= reasonable expectation of privacy
S/R- 2 prong test
, US v. White - with answers:Held that a person who invites someone into his or her home
assumes the risk, not only of being betrayed, but also of being recorded.
Doctrine= false friend doctrine
S/R= can't protect you if you confide in someone and they rat you out
US v. Kyllo - with answers:The use of a device by the government, which is not generally used
by the public, to obtain evidence from inside a home is a presumptively unreasonable search
without a warrant under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
-Thermal imaging
Doctrine= expectation of privacy, use of tech devices to enhance senses not available to public
use
S/R- minimal expectation of privacy in the home
Jones v. US - with answers:Anyone who has the right to be a premise and is the object of a
search has standing.
Doctrine= trespass doctrine, GPS tracking
S/R- invades privacy because intimate preferences can be seen by tracking someones
movements.
Riley v. California - with answers:Court unanimously held that the warrantless search and
seizure of digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional.
Doctrine= need a warrant to search a phone
S/R- because of privacy interests involved
constitution is both ____ and _____ - with answers:substantive; procedural
who can change the constitution? - with answers:the people, thru amendment process
who has power to interpret the constitution through judicial review? is this stated in the
constitution itself? - with answers:courts have power, not stated
