100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Public International Law Part 3, Accurate answers for top-tier exam performance

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
2
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
20-10-2024
Written in
2024/2025

What is the difference between dualism and monism? - ANSWER-Dualism emphasizes the distinct and independent characteristics of international law as between states and national law as within states Monism postulates that international and national law form one single legal order, or at least a number of interlocking orders which should be presumed to be coherent and consistent What is Hans Kelsen's account of monism? - ANSWER-Kelsen defines monism as a scientifically established if international and national law are part of the same system of norms receiving their validity based on that law's hierarchy & content by an intellectual operation involving the assumption of a single basic norm (Grundnorm, which is not a norm of positive law but rather a 'hypothesis of juristic thinking'. What is the basic norm/Grundnorm according to Kelsen? - ANSWER-States ought to behave as they have customarily behaved. Norms are relative. What does it mean when we say that norms are relative? - ANSWER-The basic norms are determined by what has been established by international law. You have to prove first that a norm exists, with practice, opinio juris, etc. What is the general approach of international law to national law? - ANSWER-Article 3 of the ILC's Articles - International law governs the characterization of an act of a State as internationally wrongful. Does this principle (where a state cannot plead the provisions of its own laws during failure to comply with international obligations) also apply when a state evokes its Constitution? - ANSWER-Yes. A state cannot claim that it is not responsible for breaching international law because its constitution does not require it to comply with its international obligations.

Show more Read less
Institution
Public International Law Part 3
Course
Public International Law Part 3








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Public International Law Part 3
Course
Public International Law Part 3

Document information

Uploaded on
October 20, 2024
Number of pages
2
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

Public International Law Part 3, Accurate
answers for top-tier exam performance
What is the difference between dualism and monism? - ANSWER-Dualism emphasizes
the distinct and independent characteristics of international law as between states and
national law as within states



Monism postulates that international and national law form one single legal order, or at
least a number of interlocking orders which should be presumed to be coherent and
consistent



What is Hans Kelsen's account of monism? - ANSWER-Kelsen defines monism as a
scientifically established if international and national law are part of the same system of
norms receiving their validity based on that law's hierarchy & content by an intellectual
operation involving the assumption of a single basic norm (Grundnorm, which is not a
norm of positive law but rather a 'hypothesis of juristic thinking'.



What is the basic norm/Grundnorm according to Kelsen? - ANSWER-States ought to
behave as they have customarily behaved. Norms are relative.



What does it mean when we say that norms are relative? - ANSWER-The basic norms
are determined by what has been established by international law. You have to prove
first that a norm exists, with practice, opinio juris, etc.



What is the general approach of international law to national law? - ANSWER-Article 3
of the ILC's Articles - International law governs the characterization of an act of a State
as internationally wrongful.



Does this principle (where a state cannot plead the provisions of its own laws during
failure to comply with international obligations) also apply when a state evokes its
Constitution? - ANSWER-Yes. A state cannot claim that it is not responsible for
breaching international law because its constitution does not require it to comply with its
international obligations.
$9.49
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
academiashop

Also available in package deal

Thumbnail
Package deal
International Law Essentials: Comprehensive Exams Q&A Bundle
-
24 2024
$ 253.06 More info

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
academiashop California Coast University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
136
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions