100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

psych 217 A Grade exam with Questions and 100% Correct Verified Answers| Latest Update

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
17
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
03-10-2024
Written in
2024/2025

psych 217 A Grade exam with Questions and 100% Correct Verified Answers| Latest Update

Institution
Psych 217
Course
Psych 217










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Psych 217
Course
Psych 217

Document information

Uploaded on
October 3, 2024
Number of pages
17
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

psych 217 A Grade exam with Questions
and 100% Correct Verified Answers|
Latest Update


ultimatum game what people typically do - Answer people routinely reject low offers,
modal offer is 50/50
contrary to what economists think we are usually cooperative



dictator game typcal reactions - Answer Rational Choice Theory [RCT] says we should
keep the money for ourselves, there is no benefit of giving money to another person but
large percentage give some money to the other person


trust game - Answer willingness to make investment in others and measures trust

- person one sends any portion of 100 dollars to person two and person two receives
triple the amount and then has the option to send some back to person one
- many similarities with the prisoners dilemma game
- can send money to another person (that person is the truster role)
- receiver (trustees)
- people send more than rational theory would expect
- median amount given is often above hald of ones initial investment

- trustees generally are fair in returning a significant amount of the investment gain
to the truster

- trusters generally come out ahead of where they would have if they had done the
rational choice to send zero dollar

,trust game typical outcome - Answer trustees are generally fair in returning a
significant amount of the investment gain to the truster


o Person A (sender) on average sends 50% of their amount
o Person B (receiver) sends back a decent amount
o Trust is not fully reciprocated; sender doesn't receive all their money back



evolved social cooperative rationality - Answer because most people are cooperative,
it is smart to be cooperative to increase our joint rewards
- there is some rationality to human social behavior



does human behavior often match rational choice theory behviaor - Answer
usually does not match


humans trsut - Answer do not trust unconditionally
- evolved social cooperative rationality

- because most people are cooperative, it is smart to be cooperative to increase our
joint rewards



machiavellian exploitative rationality - Answer because most people are cooperative, i
can exploit that trust for my gain



different treatment of ingroup and outgroup members - Answer we are most likely
to cooperate and help those in our own group



possibility of cheaters in games - Answer punishment of those who cheat, but
propensity to those who forgive

, ultimatum in cross cultural work - Answer across cultures with industrialized societies,
there is a lot of consistency in university student samples (mean offers 42-48%)

in non industrialized societies ther anthropological field work found huge variability
- some a bit higher than college students but MOST was much LOWER


OXYTOCIN - Answer the love hormone (molecule circulating in blood)
- increased and needed during labor, nursing and sexual activity
- higher levels of oxytocin have anxiety reducing effects (particularly in social anxiety)

- appears to play an important role in facilitating feelings of trust but not just a
general bliss neurotransmitter
- doesnt have affect on dictator game
- involved in pair bonding



De Waals Perspective - Answer much of our basic building blocks of our morality
and kind (and cruel) behavior shared with other species

- but people often make the wrong asumptions about humans when they look to
animal world (or our evolutionary history)

- we monitor and evaluate the rewards given to others and are motivated to make
sure what we get is equal to others

- cucumber and grape test with monkeys: one got cucumbers and one got grapes
and the one who got a cucumber realized it was unfair and threw a fit



De Waal Macho Original Myths - Answer argues that many psychologists and
others have the wrong idea about human ancestral life

3 Myths, ruler of the savannah, humans as autonomous, society as a historical
creation, and war is central to human life

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
KenAli West Virginia University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
84
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
5
Documents
17177
Last sold
2 weeks ago

2.9

19 reviews

5
4
4
4
3
4
2
0
1
7

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions