100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary 4.2 Groups at work Problem #4

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
6
Uploaded on
12-12-2019
Written in
2017/2018

A comprehensive summary of the fourth problem of course 4.2 "Groups at work" at the Master Positive Organizational Psychology / Work and Organizational Psychology at the Erasmus University Rotterdam. Most articles are effectively summarized in one or maximal two pages and in bullet points. Articles included are: - Manz & Sims, 1987 – The External Leadership of Self-Managing Teams - Cohen & Bailey, 1997 - Druskat & Wheeler, 2003 – Effective Leadership of SMWT - Morgeson, 2005 – External Leadershipt of SMWT: Context of Novel & Disruptive Events - Mathieu, Maynard, Rapp, & Gilson, 2008 - Wang, Waldman, Zhang, 2014 - Meta-Analysis of Shared Leadership & Team Effectiveness - Taggar, Hacket, & Saha, 1999 – Leadership Emergence in Autonomous Work Teams - Carson, Tesluk, & Marrone, 2007 – Shared Leadership in Teams - Kozlowski & Bell, 2001 - Work Groups & Teams in Organizations

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
December 12, 2019
Number of pages
6
Written in
2017/2018
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

4.2 #4 LG1: What is a self-managing team? Creation?
What is the role of an “external” leader in leading the team effectively?
Manz & Sims, 1987 – The External Leadership of Self-Managing Teams

Self-managing Teams: usually include a whole task; members who each possess a variety of relevant
skills; much autonomy in decision making, compensation & feedback about group performance
 characterized by the attempt to create a high degree of decision-making autonomy &
behavioral control at the work-group level

Purpose: identify specific self-management-team leader behaviors

Method: Observation, interviews, & literature search in a medium-sized manufacturing plant that had
been operating for several years under a system of self-managing work teams

Results:
- Leader behavior variables:
 Encouraging self-management strategies:
 Self-reinforcement
 Self-observation/evaluation
 Self-expectation
 Rehearsal
 Self-criticism & self-goal setting do not add anything beyond other techniques
 Other:
 Communicates to & from management
 Facilitation of equipment/supplies & production flow, communication
between groups, encouraging within-group communication, group training,
group problem-solving, flexible task boundaries, etc. not relevant!
- Comparing Coordinators & Team Leaders: differ overall on any given leader-behavior
variable
 All self-management leader behaviors demonstrate significant differences (except
encourages rehearsal)  coordinators perceived sig. higher on encouraging self-
management than team leaders
 Team leader is an additional team member who facilitates the group's organization
 Coordinator has a fundamental responsibility to get the group to manage itself

Limitations:
- "Post-only" measurement, without control group



Cohen & Bailey, 1997

Supervisor behavior: e.g. behaviors that encouraged self-criticism & self-management
- Negative predictor of performance for self-directed work groups (opposing to Manz & Sims)
- Possible explanations:
 Supervisors may tend to exhibit encouraging behavior with poorly performing groups
 Supervisors may actually obstruct high performance by interfering
- Encouraging behaviors had no significant relationship to outcomes for traditionally managed
groups (they might be accustomed)
- Supervisor’s positive mood positively predicted prosocial behavior & negatively predicted
turnover




1

, 4.2 #4 LG1: What is a self-managing team? Creation?
What is the role of an “external” leader in leading the team effectively?
Druskat & Wheeler, 2003 – Effective Leadership of SMWT

Method:
- Critical
incident
interviews with
the external
leaders of
SMWT & their
team members
+ interviews &
surveys
provided by
managers

Results: leaders used their location to move back & forth between their teams & the organization
engaging in 4 categories of behavior:
1) Relating with team & organization members building political awareness & relationships to
create access to those who could provide information
 Organization-focused behavior: building social & political awareness
 helps developed access to people & places that allow to scout & obtain info
 Team-focused behavior:
 Building team trust: by showing fairness, reliability, & focus on teams' best
interest (without trust team felt vulnerable / subjected to leader)
 Caring for team members: care-giving actions that show respect & concern
for individual team members
2) Scouting information & staying abreast of activities inside & outside their teams
 Organization-focused behavior: seeking info from managers, peers & specialists
 Powerful tool for influencing actions & decisions of everyone
 Team-focused behavior: seeking info from inside their own team through:
 Diagnosing member behavior: to get info about team & member needs,
problems, strengths, & weaknesses
 Investigating problems systematically: collecting & analyzing data to trace
cause of a problem (e.g. member perspectives on it, its causes, & solution)
3) Persuading their teams to attend to organization needs/goals & persuading organization to
attend to team needs to empower own teams & generate resources for team success
 Organization-focused behavior: obtaining external support
 Allowed leader to empower team & increase its decision-making authority
 Team-focused behavior: influencing the team which sometimes involved
encouraging a team to make effective choices
 Helping team understand implications of their decisions & actions
 Use of data & info most powerful tool for encouraging or influencing teams
4) Empowering their teams involves delegating decision authority & supporting that delegation
 Team-focused behavior:
 Delegating authority: highly stressful for leader (as he keeps responsibility)
 Flexibility regarding team decisions
 Coaching: strengthening member contributions, team’s confidence, & its
ability to manage itself, giving feedback, & modeling behaviors

 all facilitate self-managing work team effectiveness

Limitations: Study was designed for theory building  results must be interpreted & generalized with
caution until replicated



2
$5.96
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
havanna Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
29
Member since
6 year
Number of followers
25
Documents
7
Last sold
2 year ago

4.9

11 reviews

5
10
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions