100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

interference theory

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
3
Uploaded on
04-09-2024
Written in
2023/2024

explanations for forgetting interference theory in topic of memory aqa a level psychology

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
September 4, 2024
Number of pages
3
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Dar el
Contains
All classes

Subjects

Content preview

Explanations for forgetting interference theory.

- Occurs when 2 pieces of information become confused in memory, resulting in forgetting
one or both, and distortion in memory.
- Occurs when information is similar.
- Less likely to occur when there's a large gap between instances of memory.

Forgetting information from LTM may be caused by 2 competing memories interfering with
each other. This can be retroactive or proactive:

 Proactive interference – when an older memory interferes with a new one e.g., teacher
learning so many names in the past and then struggling to remember her new classes
names.
 Retroactive interference – when a newer memory disrupts recall of older information
and we forget an old memory e.g., changing your email and can't remember old email.

McGeoth and McDonald (1931)  effects of similarity on forgetting. (retroactive interference)
- Degree of interference increases the more similar the memories are.
- Studied retroactive interference by changing the amount of similarity between 2 sets of
materials in a lab.
- Participants had to learn a list of 10 words until they had 100% accuracy.
- They then learned a new list, 6 groups had to learn different lists:
 Group 1 – synonyms  words with the same meanings as the original
 Group 2 – antonyms  words with the opposite meanings as the originals
 Group 3 – words unrelated to the original ones
 Group 4 – consonant syllables
 Group 5 – 3-digit numbers
 Group 6 – now new list (control condition)

Findings
- Group given words most similar in meaning (synonyms) remembered the least of the 1 st
set of words.
- Suggesting interference is strongest when memories are similar.
- Supporting retroactive interference.


EVALUATION

 Real life research – Baddeley and Hitch (1977)
- Investigated whether forgetting was due to interference using rugby players.
- Asked rugby players at the end of the season to recall all the names of the teams they
had played that season week by week.
- Some players had missed matches due to injury.
$10.90
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
lolamcohn

Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
lolamcohn University of Leeds
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
71
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions