100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

PVL3704 Assignment 1 Solutions Semester 2 2024

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
5
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
16-08-2024
Written in
2024/2025

Get ahead with PVL3704 Assignment 1 Solutions for Semester 2, 2024! Our comprehensive solutions will guide you through this challenging course and help you achieve top grades. Save time and ace your assignments with our expert guidance. Join the winners and excel in your studies!

Show more Read less
Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
August 16, 2024
Number of pages
5
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

PVL3704
Assignment 1
Semester 2 2024

QUESTION 1

The key premise in calculating the amount of an enrichment claim is that the plaintiff
might request either the smaller amount of their own loss or the smaller amount of the
defendant's gain. This guarantees that the accused party is not held responsible for
an amount more than the value they have gained, and it prohibits them from unfairly
profiting above the amount the plaintiff has lost.

The quantum of the enrichment claim is usually evaluated when the claim is initiated.
The time is critical since the defendant's responsibility is determined by the amount of
enrichment they possess at that certain moment. If the defendant's gain has
diminished or disappeared prior to the initiation of the lawsuit, their responsibility is
accordingly diminished or eliminated. The burden of proving non-enrichment is with
the defendant.

There will be four cases when the quantum will be determined earlier, namely before
the action is initiated:

a. Upon the defendant's realization of enrichment;
b. At a prior stage, if the defendant had a reasonable awareness that the benefit
was not warranted;
c. when the defendant fell into mora; and
d. an earlier date if the defendant acted mala fide.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
GetItRight University of South Africa (Unisa)
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
4480
Member since
6 year
Number of followers
2684
Documents
374
Last sold
5 months ago
GetItRight

We offer assistance in all law, accounting and economics assignments, exam packs and summaries.

4.1

610 reviews

5
309
4
138
3
89
2
36
1
38

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions