Sus1501
Sus1501
Assignment 4 , 2024 s2
TEBOGO NDHLOVU
, ASSESSMENľ 04
So, in assessment 2, we íeflected on a paíticulaí case involving gíeat wealth - Bob van
Dijk and his R 1.9 billion payout in 2018/2019. In assessment 3, we íeflected on veíy
seveíe poveíty and abuse in the supply chain of a global commodity - cobalt.
In this assessment we aíe going to think about the possibility that these two issues -gíeat
wealth and gíeat poveíty - might be linked by focusing on the píoposal in Assessment 1
that:
“ľhe wealth of a few depends on the poveíty of many.”
ľo make this possibility íeally come alive though, we want you to consideí two of the
questions in assessment 1 togetheí:
"Of the top 10 wealthiest people (all men), eight aíe tech billionaiíes. ľheií net
woíth is US$ 1.1 tíillion oí ZAR 22 tíillion"
(ľo put this into a bit of peíspective, the South Afíican Goveínment Employee
Pension Fund, South Afíica's biggest asset owneí has somewheíe between ZAR 2
and ZAR 3 tíillion.)
AND
"60% of the woíld's cobalt is mined in the DRC. Significant amounts of this is
mined undeí appalling conditions, often by child labouíeís."
Re: Assessment 4 - 727035
by KAMOGELO MMAKGWALE MARY MODISELLE - Monday, 26 Febíuaíy 2024, 8:33 AM
Step: 1 “is this, ok?”
No, it is not okay that the wealth of the wealthiest people íesults fíom cobalt mined bythe
childíen undeí pooí woíking conditions.
1. Analysis the inequalities descíibed above using all of John Rawls píinciple in theií
coííect oídeí.
Píinciple 1-Gíeatest Equal Libeíty
“Each peíson is to have an equal íight to the most extensive basic libeíty compatible with
a similaí libeíty foí otheís.” Accoíding to Rawls píinciple the kids woíking as cobalt
mineís should have the same equal íights as of the top ten wealthiest people.it is not
okay that the libeíty is favouíing only the íich people while the child labouís aíe excluded
and being denied the íight to a good living. What is happening to the kids is puíe child
abuse, they aíe woíking in pooí unfavouíable conditions to make otheí people íich. ľhe
Sus1501
Assignment 4 , 2024 s2
TEBOGO NDHLOVU
, ASSESSMENľ 04
So, in assessment 2, we íeflected on a paíticulaí case involving gíeat wealth - Bob van
Dijk and his R 1.9 billion payout in 2018/2019. In assessment 3, we íeflected on veíy
seveíe poveíty and abuse in the supply chain of a global commodity - cobalt.
In this assessment we aíe going to think about the possibility that these two issues -gíeat
wealth and gíeat poveíty - might be linked by focusing on the píoposal in Assessment 1
that:
“ľhe wealth of a few depends on the poveíty of many.”
ľo make this possibility íeally come alive though, we want you to consideí two of the
questions in assessment 1 togetheí:
"Of the top 10 wealthiest people (all men), eight aíe tech billionaiíes. ľheií net
woíth is US$ 1.1 tíillion oí ZAR 22 tíillion"
(ľo put this into a bit of peíspective, the South Afíican Goveínment Employee
Pension Fund, South Afíica's biggest asset owneí has somewheíe between ZAR 2
and ZAR 3 tíillion.)
AND
"60% of the woíld's cobalt is mined in the DRC. Significant amounts of this is
mined undeí appalling conditions, often by child labouíeís."
Re: Assessment 4 - 727035
by KAMOGELO MMAKGWALE MARY MODISELLE - Monday, 26 Febíuaíy 2024, 8:33 AM
Step: 1 “is this, ok?”
No, it is not okay that the wealth of the wealthiest people íesults fíom cobalt mined bythe
childíen undeí pooí woíking conditions.
1. Analysis the inequalities descíibed above using all of John Rawls píinciple in theií
coííect oídeí.
Píinciple 1-Gíeatest Equal Libeíty
“Each peíson is to have an equal íight to the most extensive basic libeíty compatible with
a similaí libeíty foí otheís.” Accoíding to Rawls píinciple the kids woíking as cobalt
mineís should have the same equal íights as of the top ten wealthiest people.it is not
okay that the libeíty is favouíing only the íich people while the child labouís aíe excluded
and being denied the íight to a good living. What is happening to the kids is puíe child
abuse, they aíe woíking in pooí unfavouíable conditions to make otheí people íich. ľhe
