100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Edexcel A Level Politics notes on electoral systems & referendums

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
11
Uploaded on
09-07-2024
Written in
2023/2024

Pre-chewed Politics revision notes on electoral systems and referendums for Edexcel Paper 1 UK Politics

Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
July 9, 2024
Number of pages
11
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

How do UK General Elections work?
General elections:
- UK divided into 650 constituencies (= geographical territory w/ roughly equal no. of voters)
- Each constituency elects single MP to represent them in HoC
- Constituency boundaries drawn up by 4 commissions (first established 1944):
Boundary Commissions for England/Scotland/Wales/NI; conduct periodic reviews to
account for changes in constituency population size; independent of govt but must
follow Rules of Redistribution (set out in legislation + decided by Parliament)
- Commissions used to have greater flexibility when redrawing boundaries
- Following 2009 expenses scandals, calls to cut cost of politics by reducing
no. of MPs; led to Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011
(fixed no. of constituencies at 600, constituencies could no longer be >5%
higher/lower than UK quota (= total electorate/total seats) w/ exemption for 4
island seats, constituencies couldn’t be bigger than 13K square km
- Boundary Commissions conducted 2 reviews using the new rules but neither
proposal was implemented (so 2019 GE contested on boundaries drawn up
using electoral data from 2000; 236 constituencies had electorates within 5%
of the average); Govt introduced Parliamentary Constituencies Act 2020
(raised total no. of seats from 600 → 650, made implementation of Boundary
Commission's proposals automatic so reforms no longer require
Parliamentary approval
- Also required Commission to start new review: began Jan. 2021, to be
completed by 1st July 2023; England/Scotland/Wales/NI allocated seats
based on proportion of the electorate (England to get 10 more, Scotland 2
less, Wales 8 less, NI the same as before); all constituencies (except 5
islands’ seats) will have electorates between 69,724 to 77,062
- To form majority govt party must win at least 326 seats
- ‘Working majority requires fewer seats: Commons Speaker + 3 deputies don’t vote,
Sinn Fein MPs don’t sit (b/c reject British political institutions) so total no. of voting
MPs is 639 (as of 2019 GE) so 320 needed for majority
- Hung Parliament = no party wins absolute majority of seats
- Coalition govt = multiple parties agree to form govt together, combining their seats to
obtain a majority
- Minority govt = party (usually 1 w/ most seats) forms govt w/o majority
- By-elections = election held outside of GE cycle when seat becomes vacant (b/c MP has
resigned, died, been convicted of serious criminal offence)
- Not held if an MP decides to change party
- FPTP = simple plurality system (= candidate w/ the most votes (a plurality) wins; no
requirement for a majority)
- Disproportionate outcomes: votes received by each party often doesn’t correlate w/
no. of seats they win
English + Welsh local elections:
- Each ward/division elects 1/2/3 councillors depending on size
- Some councils elect whole council every 4 years, some half every 2 years, some ⅓ every
year
- If only 1 seat available, voters choose 1 candidate on the ballot paper; if >1 seat available,
voters mark their 2 or 3 preferred candidates (can vote for 1 party or distribute votes between
multiple)
- Party must win majority of seats on 1 council to win that council
- Council results are often even more disproportionate than GEs

, What are the advantages of First Past The Post?
- Simplicity:
- Easy for voters to use/understand
- Easy for those counting votes + to determine which party will probably win
- Stability: produces strong + stable govts + therefore more stable political system
- Since WWII: majority govts w/ only 3 exceptions (2 minorities, 1 coalition)
- Even under coalition, talks to form a govt are quicker b/c FPTP produces such large
majorities for the main parties (so far fewer parties are likely to be involved in talks)
- Constituency link: FPTP supporters emphasise importance of dyadic representation (= each
voter had an MP who’s expected to represent their constituency) as opposed to collective
representation (= composition of Parliament should more accurately represent political views
of electorate as a whole; voters should be able to pool votes across constituency lines +
ensure there’s a proportional no. of MPs voicing their views)
- An MP who grew up/now lives in the constituency arguable well-positioned to
articulate its views + defend its interests
- Therefore not important for results to be proportionate b/c doesn’t prevent MP from
representing their constituents
Why FPTP supporters prefer majority govts:
- Quick to form: if 1 party has absolute majority, formed pretty much immediately so can start
carrying out their work (until new govt formed, important decisions can’t be taken)
- In other European countries w/o FPTP, govts sometimes take months to form; in the
UK it takes days (if that)
- Stronger: minority govts might struggle to get agenda through Parliament
- More stable: coalition might break down + collapse before next GE
- Extreme parties are kept out of power
- FPTP encourages ‘big tent’/’catch-all’ parties (= include a variety of factions/interests
+ broad range of ideological views in order to attract more supporters; must find
common ground + broad appeal)
- More accountable: majority govt clearly responsible for policy successes/failures (+ no need
for compromise)
- Stronger mandate: single large political party aggregates the demands of its varied supporters
+ produces a popular manifesto that results in a landslide victory; in a coalition, no voters can
be said to have voted for the resulting agreement b/c they involve so much compromise
between parties

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
ellie24lauren St Albans Girls\' School
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
14
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
29
Last sold
5 months ago

Studied A Levels in English Literature (OCR), Government & Politics (Edexcel), and Sociology (AQA)

5.0

2 reviews

5
2
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions