WGU C168 Question with 100 % correct answers | Verified | updated

Ability to win an argument regardless of flaws in its reasoning - Soohistry Adopting an overly narrow point of view and thinking in absolutes. - Egocentric myopia Assumption that one own's social group is superior to all others. - Sociocentrism B. - Distinctions between elements of reasoning are _____ not _____. A. Absolute/Relative B. Relative/Absolute C. Subjective/Objective D. Objective/Subjective Bringing significant ideas and knowledge into the mind and being able to apply them, systematically, to new situations. - Activated knowledge C - In reasoning we make _____ based on _____. A. Assumptions/Inferences B. Assumptions/Information C. Inferences/Assumptions D. Inferences/Implications Commitment to discover the extent of your own ignorance on any issue. - Intellectual humility Concepts. - Theories are examples of what? Conclusion or outcome of reasoning. - InferenceConfronting ideas, viewpoints, or beliefs with fairness, even when doing so is painful. - Intellectual courage Determines how many other viewpoints are being taken in to consideration and how many perspectives are being looked at for a problem. - Breadth Dismissing an argument by attacking the person who offers it rather than refuting its reasoning. - Ad hominem Evidence and reasoning within multiple systems. Competing answers. Reasoned judgement. More than one answer, with some better than others. - Questions of judgement Evidence and reasoning within single system. Serve as basis of knowledge. Only one correct answer. - Questions of fact First-order thinking that is consciously realized (analyzed, reassessed, reconstructed). - Secondorder thinking Holding oneself to the same rigorous intellectual standards that one expects others to meet - Intellectual integrity Ignore flaws in own thinking. Often tries to win arguments through intellectually trickery or deceit. - Weak-sense critical thinking Implications. - What is said to follow from our reasoning? In analyzing causation, looking for pattern of variation between possible cause and possible effect (e.g. Exposing lab animals to different strains of tropical microbe to see which are likely to cause sickness) - Concomitant variation Inhabiting perspectives of others in order to genuinely understand them. - Intellectual empathyInvolves developing tools of critical thinking and applying them to whatever challenges you encounter in the future. - Deep learning Mentally taking in and actively using false information. - Activated ignorance Possible, probable, necessary. - The three kinds of implications that may be involved in any situation Proceeds from the belief that both the individual's and society's interests are best served by unfettered reason - Confidence in reason Questions of fact, questions of preference, questions of judgement. - Three categories of questions Strive to be ethical. Strive to emphasize with other viewpoints. Will entertain arguments they do not agree with. Change views when confronted with superior reasoning. Employ thinking reasonably rather than manipulatively. - Strong-sense critical thinking Subjective choice. No judgement or assessment. Many possible answers based on subjective answers. - Questions of preference Tendency to view everything in relationship to oneself. - Egocentrism Thinking of oneself while adhering to standards of rationality - Intellectual autonomy Thinking that is spontaneous and non-reflective thinking. Contains insight, prejudice, good and bad reasoning. Indiscriminately combined. - First-order thinking