100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

Samenvatting/aantekeningen van het vak MKNO

Rating
-
Sold
5
Pages
54
Uploaded on
20-06-2024
Written in
2022/2023

Vak MKNO is onderdeel van de premaster Klinische Gezondheidswetenschappen. Tentamen gehaald met een 7,6 mede door deze aantekeningen. Disclaimer: dit document bevat niet 100% alle informatie, ik heb mijn best gedaan alles mee te typen tijdens het vak en alle onderdelen uit te werken. Er ontbreekt mijns inziens niet een onderwerp van het vak, maar dit document is slechts een aanvulling op het studeren ter voorbereiding van je tentamen; niet per se een gouden standaard

Show more Read less
Institution
Course











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
June 20, 2024
Number of pages
54
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
J. trappenburg
Contains
All classes

Subjects

Content preview

Samenvatting MKNO




1

,Inhoud
College 1 MKNO ...................................................................................................................................... 6
Deductief redeneren........................................................................................................................... 6
Inductief redeneren ............................................................................................................................ 6
Etiologisch onderzoek ......................................................................................................................... 6
Diagnostisch onderzoek ...................................................................................................................... 6
Interventie onderzoek ........................................................................................................................ 7
Klinimetrisch onderzoek ..................................................................................................................... 7
Algemene epidemiologische breuk: ................................................................................................... 7
College 2 MKNO ...................................................................................................................................... 9
Probleem- doel- en vraagstelling ........................................................................................................ 9
Probleemstelling ................................................................................................................................. 9
Doelstelling ......................................................................................................................................... 9
Ontwikkelfase van de onderzoeksvraag ............................................................................................. 9
Formuleren onderzoeksvraag, bestaat uit 2 stappen ....................................................................... 10
Definitie hypothese .......................................................................................................................... 11
Toetsen van hypothesen................................................................................................................... 11
Domein versus studiepopulatie ........................................................................................................ 12
Census ............................................................................................................................................... 13
Steekproef trekking – sampling ........................................................................................................ 13
Sampling technieken......................................................................................................................... 13
Epidemiologische functie à ............................................................................................................. 13
Selecte steekproeven........................................................................................................................ 14
Cohort VS dynamische populatie ...................................................................................................... 14
Voor- en nadelen cohortstudie ......................................................................................................... 15
Dynamische populatie ..................................................................................................................... 15
Case-control study ............................................................................................................................ 16
Voor- en nadelen case-control study ................................................................................................ 17
Generaliseerbaarheid – representativiteit ....................................................................................... 17
Aspecten in studie design ................................................................................................................. 17
Uitkomst en determinanten ............................................................................................................. 18
Beschrijvend vs. verklarend .............................................................................................................. 18
College 3 MKNO .................................................................................................................................... 19
Frequentie maten ............................................................................................................................. 20
Epidemiologische breuk incidentie/prevalentie ............................................................................... 20
Prevalentie ........................................................................................................................................ 20

2

, Punt-prevalentie ............................................................................................................................... 21
Periode-prevalentie .......................................................................................................................... 21
Incidentie .......................................................................................................................................... 21
Cumulatieve incidentie ..................................................................................................................... 21
Incidentie dichtheid .......................................................................................................................... 22
Associatiematen ............................................................................................................................... 24
Risicoverschil (RV) ............................................................................................................................. 24
The Number Needed to Treat (NNT) ................................................................................................ 25
Relatief risico (RR) ............................................................................................................................. 25
Attributieve proportie van de blootgestelde populatie (APE) .......................................................... 26
Attributieve proportie van de totale populatie (APT) ....................................................................... 26
Odds ratio (OR) ................................................................................................................................. 26
(Correlatiematen (pearson r, ICC, Spearman rank)) ......................................................................... 27
College 4 MKNO .................................................................................................................................... 28
Externe validiteit ............................................................................................................................... 28
Interne validiteit ............................................................................................................................... 28
Betrouwbaarheid .............................................................................................................................. 28
Standaard fout .................................................................................................................................. 29
Betrouwbaarheidsinterval ................................................................................................................ 29
Grote en kleine precisie .................................................................................................................... 29
Validiteit van onderzoeksresultaten ................................................................................................. 29
Bias.................................................................................................................................................... 29
Response verhogen .......................................................................................................................... 30
Selectie bias = ................................................................................................................................... 30
Selectie bias: cohortonderzoek......................................................................................................... 31
Informatiebias................................................................................................................................... 31
Observer bias .................................................................................................................................... 31
Recall bias ......................................................................................................................................... 32
Confounding ..................................................................................................................................... 32
Verschil confounding en bias ............................................................................................................ 33
Elimineren van confounding ............................................................................................................. 34
Effect modificatie .............................................................................................................................. 34
Verschil effectmodificatie en confouding: ........................................................................................ 35
College 5 en 6 MKNO ............................................................................................................................ 36
Verschil interactie en effectmodificatie ............................................................................................ 36
Etiologisch onderzoek ....................................................................................................................... 37

3

, Aard onderzoeksbevindingen ........................................................................................................... 38
Causaliteit – Criteria van Hill ............................................................................................................. 38
Etiologisch onderzoek – designs ....................................................................................................... 38
Design van data-analyse bij etiologisch onderzoek ........................................................................ 39
Voorbeeld confounding case-control study...................................................................................... 40
College 7 en 8 MKNO ............................................................................................................................ 41
Interventie onderzoek ...................................................................................................................... 41
Klinisch epidemiologisch onderzoeksopzet ...................................................................................... 41
Interventieonderzoek (achtergrond) ................................................................................................ 41
Experimenteel vs. niet-experimenteel onderzoek ............................................................................ 42
Confounding interventie onderzoek ................................................................................................. 42
College 9 MKNO .................................................................................................................................... 43
Diagnostisch onderzoek .................................................................................................................... 43
Prognostisch onderzoek ................................................................................................................... 43
Diagnostisch versus Prognostische onderzoek ................................................................................. 43
Selectie bias ...................................................................................................................................... 44
Measurement bias ............................................................................................................................ 44
Attrition bias ..................................................................................................................................... 44
Vaststellen van het model ................................................................................................................ 45
College 11 en 12 MKNO ........................................................................................................................ 47
Klinimetrisch onderzoek ................................................................................................................... 47
Klinimetrisch versus Diagnostisch onderzoek ................................................................................... 47
Voorbeeld klinimetrisch onderzoek .................................................................................................. 48
Klinimetrisch onderzoek à theoretisch design ................................................................................ 48
Kwaliteit meetinstrumenten ............................................................................................................. 48
Vormen van validiteit........................................................................................................................ 48
Face validiteit: ................................................................................................................................... 49
Content validiteit: ............................................................................................................................. 49
Construct validiteit ........................................................................................................................... 49
Criterium validiteit ............................................................................................................................ 49
Vormen van betrouwbaarheid ......................................................................................................... 50
Betrouwbaarheid/interne consistentie ............................................................................................ 50
Responsitiviteit longitudinale validiteit .......................................................................................... 50
Klinische bruikbaarheid .................................................................................................................... 50
Klinimetrisch onderzoek – dataverzameling ..................................................................................... 51
Opzet klinimetrisch onderzoek KIPPI ................................................................................................ 51

4

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
michelledanique1996 Universiteit Utrecht
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
82
Member since
8 year
Number of followers
23
Documents
10
Last sold
6 days ago

Hi! Welkom op mijn profiel! Gedurende mijn studie Hbo-verpleegkunde en KGW had ik veel baat bij het schrijven van samenvattingen en stopte ik veel tijd en energie in het schrijven van mijn papers. Deze wil ik graag met jullie delen, waarbij ik hoop dat jullie er veel aan zullen hebben.

4.5

4 reviews

5
2
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions