100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary problem 7.4

Rating
5.0
(1)
Sold
-
Pages
6
Uploaded on
09-07-2019
Written in
2018/2019

Summary for block 1.7 at Erasmus university (). I'm enrolled in international psychology, however the sources and study materials are the same in both psychology courses. Hence, these summaries may also be useful for Dutch students. The summaries are based on at least 2 of the required reading materials. For this course my final grade was a 9.0. Therefore, I hope they will be of assistance in preparation for your exams.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
July 9, 2019
Number of pages
6
Written in
2018/2019
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Summary #4 two is better than one
Definitions
Group
= 2+ people in face-to-face interaction, all aware of their group membership &
interdependence as they strive to achieve their goals.
- Identifiable unit
- Relate to one another in a meaningful way
- Share dispositions  collective identity
Aggregate
= a collection of unrelated people who are in close proximity in an unmeaningful way & for
only a short period of time
Group dynamics
= the forces operating within groups that affect their performance & member satisfaction




5 characteristics of groups/ group power depends on:
1. A minimum of 2 members
= The more members there are the more relationships can be formed; this requires:
 High level of communication
 Complex group structure
2. A communication network
= every member should be able to talk every other member
3. Sense of collective identity
= not see self as an independent individual, rather part of a distinct group
4. Complementary goals
= only able to achieve goals through membership  need to work together
5. group structure
= roles & norms are fixed and dictate how to behave within the group

, Benefits of working in a group:
 Tasks can be fulfilled cost-effectively
 Effective learning within the organization
 Promote improved quality management
 Promote process re-engineering
 Reduce production time
 Cross-fertilization of ideas  innovation
 Groups can better be monitored, coordinated, directed
 Groups can better cope with increasing complexity

Types of group tasks:
1. Additive
= all group members perform the same task & the sum of all inputs is the final
outcome, this means there is low interdependency.
e.g.; giving a car a push start
2. Conjunctive
= the final outcome of the task is dependent of the performance of the least talented
member. In this sort of task there is high interdependency. All elements are equally
important to success.
e.g.; relay races
3. Disjunctive
= the final outcome of the task is dependent of the most talented member in the
group. Average performance is higher than the groups average member. There is
high interdependency. In disjunctive tasks groups tend to outperform aggregates.

- specific subgroup: Eureka task
 only one correct solution, members have immediate insight/knowledge about the correct
answer. Performance is dependent on the most talented member.

Group development
1. Forming
= orientation stage;
 Gather information about team members
 Establish ground rules
 Make a personal impression on group members
2. Storming
= conflict stage
 Hostility; struggle for leadership
 Need to resolve conflict
3. Norming
= rules are established; leadership is accepted,
4. Performing
= effective group structure has been established
 Not all groups are able to reach this stage & remain ineffective
5. Adjourning
= aftermath of group formation ( after task has been completed)
 Reflection
$3.59
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
5 year ago

5.0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
maremenick Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
55
Member since
6 year
Number of followers
28
Documents
84
Last sold
3 year ago

4.4

13 reviews

5
8
4
2
3
3
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions