100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Video assignment 3 Clinical Development and Clinical Trials (AM_1180)

Rating
-
Sold
2
Pages
4
Grade
7-8
Uploaded on
08-06-2024
Written in
2023/2024

This is the text for video assignment 3, about the framework that regulates clinical trials. It also includes the references that were used.

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
June 8, 2024
Number of pages
4
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

General info:
- Public faith in the healthcare system should be the norm, so new medicines should be
developed in a way that provides public assurance of the protection of trial participants
and reliability of trial results
- In your 3-minute video, explain the framework with which the regulated world of Clinical
Research works to provide that assurance and earn that faith.
- In your words, explain how the ethical and scientific standards are ensured, from design
to report, from development plan to marketing. Demonstrate your insight into how
quality is regulated and explain why public faith is warranted.
- If you feel that public faith is NOT warranted you argue, supported by arguments, how
the regulated world of clinical research, in your opinion, fails to make its case to provide
the public assurance that decisions are made based on reliable trial results.
- ADD REFERENCES

What needs to be in there →
- ICH-GCP (ICH-E6) → risk-based approach (data identification and risk identification,
evaluation, control, communication, review and reporting), quality assurance and
control, audits and inspections.
- EU-CTR → centralised monitoring through CTIS (database of all clinical trials of
investigational medical products (IMPs)).
- Declaration of Helsinki (most important principles) → informed consent.
$4.22
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
yaralangeveld Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
364
Member since
8 year
Number of followers
180
Documents
119
Last sold
2 days ago
Samenvattingen NW&I (Universiteit Utrecht) en MPA (VU Amsterdam)

Ik ben een enthousiaste student die graag zelf goede samenvattingen maakt voor tentamens over diverse vakken van innovatie en natuurwetenschappen. Deze wil ik graag met jou delen, zodat jij je ook optimaal kunt voorbereiden op tentamens! Groetjes!

3.9

36 reviews

5
12
4
14
3
6
2
2
1
2

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions